cheating.docx 

Course Project Part2--Due Week 7 To demonstrate your understanding and application of the concepts of human development, this second paper will cover young adulthood through old age. You must pick one individuals other than yourself to write about (one for each paper).Papers are to be done in APA style.Paper should be four to six pages of content, plus a cover page. Papers must include both introduction and conclusion paragraphs.Key points for each stage of life are provided below. Students will want to addresseach area noted below, but they need not answer absolutely every questionto get full credit.Papers should demonstrate an understanding of the stages and developmental tasksof each age/stage. The use of proper terminology supported with examples from the individual’s life is a good way to demonstrate your understanding.Each paper is to be submitted as a Microsoft Word .Young Adulthood(Material from Week 5)Discuss the physical development of the selected individual during young adulthood. Were there observable changes in growth, strength, and physical functioning? How did lifestyle impact health? Discuss the cognitive development of the selected individual during young adulthood. What developments in thinking were observed? Were there changes in morals? What possible selves were examined or explored? How did the individual fare with personal control beliefs? Whatwere his or her dreams as a young adult? Discuss the social development of theindividual during early adulthood. Were there many close friendships? How didthese friendships start? What caused them to grow? What caused other ones toend? How were his or her relationships with family members? How did theindividual handle Erikson's psycho-social task of intimacy versus isolation?Was the person single? Did the individual find love? Get married? Havechildren? Was the marriage a lasting one? Why did the relationship last orfail? Did the person have children? Were the children planned? How did theindividual fare as a parent?  25 points--The answer clearly and fully addresses theconcepts in the section. The paper reflects an understanding of thedevelopmental concepts in the section. All concepts are addressed and supportedwith relevant examples. The answer uses and applies the vocabulary andterminology of developmental psychology when applicable. 18-24 points--The answer addresses the concepts in thesection, but it is not completely developed or supported with relevantexamples. The answer does not address all of the developmental concepts of thesection. The answer does not use and apply the vocabulary and terminology ofdevelopmental psychology when applicable.10-17 points--The answer for the section is incompleteand/or not well supported. 5-9 points--The question is attempted, but the answer iswrong or the examples are inappropriate.MiddleAdulthood (Material from Week 6)Examine the individual's occupationalselection and development. Did he or she settle into one career or changecareers? How did the individual come to make these choices? Was he or shesatisfied with the career? Would the person have chosen to do somethingdifferent if he or she had it all to do over again? Did he or she have to dealwith discrimination? Unemployment? What was the person's life outside ofwork like? How was the individual's relationship with his or her own parents?Did he or she have to provide care for an older family member? If so, how didthat go? How was the subject's relationship with his or her own child orchildren? What did the person do with his or her free time? What leisureactivities did he or she enjoy the most? What would the individual have done ifhe or she had had more free time? Discuss the physical and cognitivedevelopment of the selected individual during middle adulthood. Were thereobservable changes in growth, strength, and physical functioning? Did theperson have any major health problems? Did he or she have a great deal of stress?If so, from what? Did he or she exercise? What developments in thinking wereobserved? Were there changes in morals? Discuss the social development of theindividual during middle adulthood. Were the friendships of early adulthoodmaintained? Were new friendships formed? How was the relationship with membersof the family of origin? Was the person close to his or her siblings (ifapplicable)? How did the person handle any "empty nest" issues? Howdid he or she handle Erikson's psycho-social task of generativity versusstagnation?  25 points--The answer clearly and fully addresses theconcepts in the section. The paper reflects an understanding of thedevelopmental concepts in the section. All concepts are addressed and supportedwith relevant examples. The answer uses and applies the vocabulary andterminology of developmental psychology when applicable.18-24 points--The answer addresses the concepts in thesection, but it is not completely developed or supported with relevantexamples. The answer does not address all of the developmental concepts of thesection. The answer does not use and apply the vocabulary and terminology ofdevelopmental psychology when applicable.10-17 points--The answer for the section is incompleteand/or not well supported.5-9 points--The question is attempted, but the answer iswrong or the examples are inappropriate.Late Adulthood(Material from Week 7)Discuss the physical development of theselected individual during late adulthood. Were there any major health issues?Observable changes in weight, strength, and physical functioning? Were thereissues or changes in sleep patterns? Discuss the cognitive development ofthe selected individual during late adulthood. What changes in memory,attention, and processing speed were observed? Did any issues with depression,anxiety, dementia, or so forth develop? Discuss the social development of theindividual during late adulthood. What role did siblings play (if applicable)?What was his or her relationship with them like? Was he or she able to retain adegree of independence? How did the individual feel about aging? Were theremany close friendships? How did the individual handle Erikson's psycho-socialtask of integrity versus despair? How did the individual cope with the loss offamily members and good friends? To what degree did he or she experience deathanxiety? How did he or she cope with it? What is his or her view of death? Whatreligious belief does the person have regarding death? Is this a comfort? Hashe or she ever had a paranormal experience with a deceased relative or friend(strange dream, premonition, vision, hallucination, etc.)? What does the individualadvise young people about how to live?  25 points--The answer clearly and fully addresses theconcepts in the section. The paper reflects an understanding of thedevelopmental concepts in the section. All concepts are addressed and supportedwith relevant examples. The answer uses and applies the vocabulary andterminology of developmental psychology when applicable.· 18-24 points--The answer addresses the concepts in thesection, but it is not completely developed or supported with relevant examples.The answer does not address all of the developmental concepts of the section.The answer does not use and apply the vocabulary and terminology ofdevelopmental psychology when applicable.· 10-17 points--The answer for the section is incompleteand/or not well supported.· 5-9 points--The question is attempted, but the answer iswrong or the examples are inappropriate.Introductionand conclusion, APA style, references, spelling, grammar, and so forth  25     points--An introduction and conclusion are present, APA style is accurate,     and there are no spelling or grammatical errors. 18-24     points--The paper has an introduction and conclusion, may have minor     errors in APA formatting, includes at least one reference, and may have     minor spelling or grammatical errors.10-17     points--The paper is lacking either an introduction or conclusion, has     poor use of APA format, has no references, and/or has minor spelling or     grammatical errors.5-9     points--The paper does not include an introduction and/or conclusion, has     poor use of APA format, has no references provided, and/or has poor     spelling and grammar.

DQ #1Technology and Brain Development ·  What are the implications of the use of technology on understanding brain development and behavior? Provide examples.   The two DQs each week for this course need to be 250-300 words in length.If your response to the DQ is not at least 250 words, it will not be counted as substantive. Two references are needed – one may be the textbook and the other must be a peer-reviewed article. It is important to your learning that you read research based articles separate from the textbook. The UOP library is a great source of these articles.Use in-text citations for all references and use APA formatting for the references.(Remember to answer all parts of the question).You will need to cite your references in your DQ response to receive credit as substantive.  The UOP program is all about "practicality," so do not neglect to include real world applications every chance you get. I expect your discussion question responses to reflect critical thought and at least 60% to be your own thoughts and words.   Development of CognitionDiscuss cognitive development in children from birth to age 18. What happens if the milestones of cognitive development are delayed?The two DQs each week for this course need to be 250-300 words in length. If your response to the DQ is not at least 250 words, it will not be counted as substantive. Two references are needed – one may be the textbook and the other must be a peer-reviewed article. It is important to your learning that you read research based articles separate from the textbook. The UOP library is a great source of these articles. Use in-text citations for all references and use APA formatting for the references. (Remember to answer all parts of the question). You will need to cite your references in your DQ response to receive credit as substantive. The UOP program is all about "practicality," so do not neglect to include real world applications every chance you get. I expect your discussion question responses to reflect critical thought and at least 60% to be your own thoughts and words.