RA 2: Written Report

Anonymous
timer Asked: Jan 19th, 2018
account_balance_wallet $20

Question description

You have completed your assessment of the employee and have the required information about the employee. You also have the information about three other predictors you reported in M4 Assignment 1. You have also administered a risk assessment instrument, and the employee has been classified to be at moderate risk for assaultive behavior in the next five years.

On the basis of the results of your investigation, in a mock report format based on the module readings and vignette data for the assignment tasks of the previous modules, create a 10- to 12-page report addressing the following:

  • The results of the interview with the employee (a description of your mock interaction with and the mental status examination of the employee)
  • A specific review of the employee's predictors of violence factors
  • An analysis of the validity and reliability of risk assessment instruments for making predictions of violence appropriate for the employee's assessment
  • The mock conclusions you arrived at about the employee's potential for showing violence, while explaining reasons for such conclusions
  • Some cautionary statements about the tenuousness of your conclusions, given the low base rate of violence in the employee

In addition, in your report, identify at least one potential victim of the employee. Make a recommendation for action by the company to protect that victim. Prepare your findings and recommendations in such a way that the employee cannot effectively sue the company for slander. An axiom of law is that negative statements do not constitute slander if they can be supported. Your job is to write the report in such a way (with supportable conclusions) that the company can establish that its actions were prudent.

Tutor Answer

TeacherBauer
School: University of Virginia

thank you

Running head: RISK ASSESMENT

1

Risk Assessment
Student’s Name

Institution

RISK ASSESMENT

2
Risk Assessment

Introduction

Workplace violence is among the greatest concerns for employees and employers in the
modern organizations and the employment sector at large. According to the research findings
presented by Coid et al. (2015), at least 2 million workers in the United States encounter
different forms of violence at their place of work every year. Such worrying figures indicate that
workplace violence is not limited to any sectorial or geographical locations, and that no
employee is immune to violence. In this case, violence is manifested through verbal abuses,
threats, homicide, and assault, which lead to injuries or deaths. This report discusses an
assessment on employee’s risk for assault that was conducted for the purposes of providing
effective recommendations to the organizational management to improve the safety measures at
the workplace. For the purposes of this study, assault is defined as any violent verbal or physical
behavior towards another person, causing emotional or bodily injury, distress, or pain. Examples
of actions constituting assault are punching, kicking, poking, pushing, or hitting. Others include
insults, fights and bites, stalking, making fists, and bruising.

Interview results with the employee

From the onset of our interaction, I could establish various behaviors by the employee
that suggested he was experiencing some disturbances of discomfort in life. For instance, he
opened the door to the room I was seated and left it wide open after entry. When I reminded him
to close the door, he clenched his fist and used it to slam the door before taking an empty chair
around the table. Among other notable characteristics included pacing around in the hall and

RISK ASSESMENT

3

becoming startled with ease. There was palpable evidence of frustration, hostility, and a feeling
of prejudice against him in his responses to numerous questions put before him.
On various occasions, he was inclined to invading other people’s privacy, especially by
seeking to know both their work and off-work affairs. I also noted that the employee always tried
to be louder than anyone else when speaking or arguing about anything. From his gestures and
non-verbal communication, it was easy to identify his desire for self-imposition and the urge to
convince others to adopt his idea or way of thinking. In addition, this employee looked overly
aggressive and assumed an upright posture while speaking to others with a steady eye contact.
He employee also admitted to lacking sleep, experiencing irregular episodes of hunger and loss
of appetite, and trauma.

Although he admits to having come close to using marijuana in the past, he has not used
any drug or substance of abuse throughout his life. He acknowledges that some of his peers at
work believe he uses intoxicating substances, a myth that he has had to put up with and often
accepted to disguise his uncontrollable anger and frustrations. He is certainly in fear of being
powerless or helpless because of the humiliation that such feeling brings with it. Based on the
traumatic stress theory, traumatic and stressful events that the employee might have experienced
in the past are primary factors for the hypersensitivity reactions to possible threats, poor social
functioning, and the high levels of aggression. In this case, stressful experiences are shown to
create both cognitive and emotional states to the victims, compelling them to manage them
through aggression, arguments, and violent exposures.

Review of the Employee's Predictors of Violence Factors

RISK ASSESMENT

4

Clearly, this employee exhibited assaultive behaviors that he practiced as an individua...

flag Report DMCA
Review

Anonymous
Good stuff. Would use again.

Similar Questions
Hot Questions
Related Tags

Brown University





1271 Tutors

California Institute of Technology




2131 Tutors

Carnegie Mellon University




982 Tutors

Columbia University





1256 Tutors

Dartmouth University





2113 Tutors

Emory University





2279 Tutors

Harvard University





599 Tutors

Massachusetts Institute of Technology



2319 Tutors

New York University





1645 Tutors

Notre Dam University





1911 Tutors

Oklahoma University





2122 Tutors

Pennsylvania State University





932 Tutors

Princeton University





1211 Tutors

Stanford University





983 Tutors

University of California





1282 Tutors

Oxford University





123 Tutors

Yale University





2325 Tutors