For the second part of your summative assessment, you will assume the role of an employee at a fictional company and prepare an executive memo pertaining to the legal and ethical implications of a company doing business internationally.ScenarioScenarioScenarioScenarioScenarioScenarioScenarioScenarioYou are working for a major U.S. corporation that wants to expand its reach globally and has narrowed the search to either Mexico or Japan. Your supervisor has asked you to prepare a memo that analyzes potential compliance issues with respect to aspects of law and ethics that are specific to one of the two countries. You will choose to prepare your memo for either Mexico or Japan and address the critical elements below. This will help inform the final executive decision.Because you have some fluency with domestic laws, and given your background and history with the corporation, you have been asked to assess the pros and cons of the decision, and to provide your insights with respect to the ethical and legal implications of the expansion.Specifically, the following critical elements must be addressed:I. What pertinent aspects of U.S. law should the company be aware of in its goal to do business internationally?II. Assess the legal implications of moving business abroad specific to your chosen country. What are the advantages and disadvantages?III. What are the ethical implications involved in this business decision?IV. Explain how other domestic companies have managed to comply with the U.S. laws related to this business decision in the past. How did thesecompanies address potential compliance issues?

Competencies Addressed in This AssignmentCompetency 1: Articulate how the rules of criminal procedure apply to a criminal justice practitioner.Competency 2: Illustrate ethical compliance with criminal procedure from a criminal justice practitioner perspective.Competency 3: Apply the 4th, 5th, and 6th Amendments in a criminal justice context. OverviewThe plain touch doctrine is a legal principle that allows a police officer to seize any contraband that the officer can immediately and clearly identify by touch while conducting a legal pat-down search. In Minnesota v. Dickerson (1993), the Supreme Court held: "If a police officer lawfully pats down a suspect's outer clothing and feels an object whose contour or mass makes its identity immediately apparent, there has been no invasion of the suspect's privacy beyond that already authorized by the officer's search for weapons; if the object is contraband, its warrantless seizure would be justified by the same practical considerations that inhere in the plain-view context."InstructionsFor your assignment, prepare a three-page training memo, citing a minimum of two academically verified sources, to be distributed to rookie officers in your department during their training regarding proper criminal procedure with respect to the plain touch doctrine.In your memo:Articulate legally compliant procedural steps for a criminal justice practitioner in a situation involving the plain touch doctrine.Explain classification of the plain touch doctrine as reasonable or unreasonable for a criminal justice professional.Examine whether the plain touch doctrine is a threat to 4th Amendment protections.Describe the implications of officers being able to manipulate objects that can be readily felt.Be sure to review the Plain Touch Doctrine Scoring Guide to ensure you understand the criteria for this assignment.RequirementsYour memo should meet the following requirements:Written communication: Must be free of errors that detract from the overall message.References: A minimum of two references.APA format: Format resources and citations as per current APA style and formatting guidelines.Length of memo: Three pages, not including the title page and the references page.Font and font size: Times New Roman, 12 point.