Description
Imagine the following scenario:
You are walking to your car in the back corner of an isolated parking lot. A man suddenly appears and approaches you. He has one hand in his coat pocket, and you suspect he may be armed. Is it better for you if this event happens in a state with a three-strikes law, which mandates harsh sentences for a person who commits a violent felony and who already has two previous felony convictions, or in a state without such a law?
Write a 350- to 700-word paper about this scenario and question, in which you include the following:
- Describe the problem.
- Construct at least one critical thinking argument supporting one side of the issue.
- Construct one creative thinking argument supporting the other side of the issue.
- Explain the rationale for your arguments.
This week's paper is not as difficult as you may think. You are using the parking lot scenario as an example only You will need to use critical thinking and determine if any offender in this situation would be punished more in a state with the three strike law or in a state without the law. You should use at least two examples; one being a state with the law and one without. You then give arguments why one is better than the other.
Explanation & Answer
Hi, kindly find attached
Running Head: CRITICAL AND CREATIVE THINKING ON THREE- STRIKE LAW
Critical and Creative Thinking on Three- Strike Law
Student’s Name
Institution
Date
1
CRITICAL AND CREATIVE THINKING ON THREE- STRIKE LAW
2
In the case that the man seems to arm the first thing is to ensure that my safety is well
catered. I may choose to act by confronting the man as a counter attack. In this case, I may
decide to take a low profile and avoid any confrontation especially if I have ever been involved
in the act of crime. This is because in case am convicted as a result of confronting the man, in
this case, my chances of getting a harsh punishment will considerably increase. On the other
hand, I may take a first step in confronting the man in the case where I have not been convicted
of a crime in less than two times. This is because having not been previously in lesser off...
