Very detailed project requiring close attention.

Content Type

User Generated

User

Nzvq

Subject

Health Medical

Description

Reading Research Literature Guidelines

Updated 8/11/2017

Purpose

The student will read research literature to determine the research purpose, question, design, population, sample, limitations, data collection and analysis.

Course Outcomes

This assignment enables the student to meet the following course outcomes:

CO2: Apply research principles to the interpretation of the content of published research studies. (PO4 and 8)

CO4: Evaluate published nursing research for credibility and lab significance related to evidence-based practice. (PO4 and 8)

Points: This assignment is worth 225 points.

Due Date: Submit the completed Reading Research Literature form (Links to an external site.)Links to an external site. by 11:59 p.m. MT Sunday at the end of Week 5.

Requirements

Download the research articles from the Chamberlain library.

Retrieve the following research articles: Make sure you are viewing the full text PDF. If you view the article in HTML format, you may not be able to see the tables and figures that are referenced in the questions.

Velayutham, S. G., Chandra, S. R., Bharath, S., & Shankar, R. G. (2017). Quantitative balance and gait measurement in patients with frontotemporal dementia and Alzheimer diseases: A pilot study. Indian Journal Of Psychological Medicine, 39(2), 176-182. doi:10.4103/0253-7176.203132. http://proxy.chamberlain.edu:8080/login?url=http://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=a9h&AN=122248443&site=eds-live&scope=site (Links to an external site.)Links to an external site.

Pals, R. S., Hansen, U. M., Johansen, C. B., Hansen, C. S., Jørgensen, M. E., Fleischer, J., & Willaing, I. (2015). Making sense of a new technology in clinical practice: A qualitative study of patient and physician perspectives. BMC Health Services Research, 15(1), 1-10. doi:10.1186/s12913-015-1071-1 http://proxy.chamberlain.edu:8080/login?url=http://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=her&AN=109884152&site=eds-live (Links to an external site.)Links to an external site.

Download the Reading Research Literature form (Links to an external site.)Links to an external site..
Watch the video on how to complete this assignment at http://www.brainshark.com/devry/vu?pi=zGCzbNjK4zHr05z0. (Links to an external site.)Links to an external site.
Type answers to the questions directly onto the form. Your form does NOT need to follow APA formatting; however, you are expected to use correct grammar, spelling, syntax, and write in complete sentences.
Please post questions about this assignment to the Q & A Forum.
Save the file by clicking Save as and adding your last name, e.g., NR439_W5_Reading_Research_Literature_Form_Smith.docx.
Submit the completed form by 11:59 p.m. MT Sunday at the end of Week 5.

**Academic Integrity Reminder**

Chamberlain College of Nursing values honesty and integrity. All students should be aware of the Academic Integrity policy and follow it in all discussions and assignments.

By submitting this assignment, I pledge on my honor that all content contained is my own original work except as quoted and cited appropriately. I have not received any unauthorized assistance on this assignment.

Please see the grading criteria and rubrics on this page.

NOTE: Please use your browser's File setting to save or print this page.

Rubric

NR439_Reading_Research_Literature

Criteria

Ratings

Pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeVelayutham, et al article: Question 1 PurposeIdentifies the purpose of the research article.

10.0 pts

Correctly identifies the purpose of the research article.

9.0 pts

Mostly identifies the purpose of the research article

8.0 pts

Somewhat identifies the purpose of the research article.

4.0 pts

Offers a purpose for the article, but incorrectly identifies it.

0.0 pts

Does not identify any purpose for the research.

10.0 pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeQuestion 2 Research QuestionIdentifies the research question implied in the study.

10.0 pts

Correctly identifies the research question in the study, or identifies the implied question, or indicates that no research question was given.

9.0 pts

Mostly identifies the research question that the author described.

8.0 pts

Somewhat identifies the research question that the author described.

4.0 pts

Offers a research question, but incorrectly identifies it.

0.0 pts

Does not identify any research question.

10.0 pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeQuestion 3 Research DesignDescribes the research design of the study.

10.0 pts

Correctly describes the research design of the study.

9.0 pts

Mostly describes the research design of the study.

8.0 pts

Somewhat describes the research design of the study.

4.0 pts

Offers a research design, but incorrectly identifies it.

0.0 pts

Does not identify any research design.

10.0 pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeQuestion 4 PopulationIdentifies and describes the population.

10.0 pts

Correctly identifies and describes in detail the population of the research article.

9.0 pts

Mostly describes identifies and describes the population of the research article.

8.0 pts

Somewhat identifies and describes the population of the research article.

4.0 pts

Offers a population, but incorrectly identifies it as the one in the research article.

0.0 pts

Does not identify any population.

10.0 pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeQuestion 5 SampleWas the sample adequate for the research design?

10.0 pts

Correctly explains if the sampling approach was appropriate for the research design studied, and if it was adequate.

9.0 pts

Correctly explains if the sampling approach was appropriate for the research design studied, but fails to correctly identify if it was adequate.

8.0 pts

Correctly explains the sampling approach, but incorrectly identifies if it was, or was not, appropriate or adequate.

4.0 pts

Misidentifies the sampling approach.

0.0 pts

Doesn’t explain any sampling approach.

10.0 pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeQuestion 6 Data CollectionDescribe the data collection procedure

10.0 pts

Correctly describes the data collection procedure in detail.

9.0 pts

Correctly describes the data collection procedure in general.

8.0 pts

Correctly describes most of the data collection procedure but fails to describe all of it.

4.0 pts

Incorrectly describes the data collection procedure, or omits most of the information.

0.0 pts

Does not describe any data collection procedures.

10.0 pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeQuestion 7 Data AnalysisHow were the data analyzed

10.0 pts

Correctly describes how the all of the data were analyzed.

9.0 pts

Correctly describes how most of the data were analyzed.

8.0 pts

Describes how the data were analyzed, but may contain some misinformation.

4.0 pts

Describes incorrectly how data were analyzed, or omitted large portions of the information.

0.0 pts

Does not describe how data were analyzed.

10.0 pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeQuestion 8 LimitationsDescribes the limitations in the study.

10.0 pts

Correctly describes all of the limitations in the study.

9.0 pts

Correctly describes most of the limitations in the study.

8.0 pts

Correctly describes some of the limitations in the study, but may omit one or two.

4.0 pts

Minimally describes the limitations of the study, or misidentifies them.

0.0 pts

Does not describe any limitations for the study.

10.0 pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeQuestion 9 ConclusionsDescribes the authors’ conclusions.

10.0 pts

Correctly describes all of the authors’ conclusions.

9.0 pts

Correctly describes most of the authors’ conclusions.

8.0 pts

Correctly describes some of the authors’ conclusions, but may omit one or two.

4.0 pts

Minimally describes the author’s conclusions, or misidentifies them.

0.0 pts

Does not describe any author conclusions.

10.0 pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeQuestion 10 Advances KnowledgeHow does this advance knowledge in the field.

10.0 pts

Describes in-depth how this research advances knowledge in the field.

9.0 pts

Generally, describes how this research advances knowledge.

8.0 pts

Briefly describes how this research advances knowledge in the field.

4.0 pts

Incorrectly describes how this research advances knowledge in the field.

0.0 pts

Does not describe how the research advances knowledge in the field.

10.0 pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomePals et al article: Question 11 PurposeIdentifies the purpose of the research article.

10.0 pts

Correctly identifies the purpose of the research article.

9.0 pts

Mostly identifies the purpose of the research article

8.0 pts

Somewhat identifies the purpose of the research article.

4.0 pts

Offers a purpose for the article, but incorrectly identifies it.

0.0 pts

Does not identify any purpose for the research.

10.0 pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeQuestion 12 Research QuestionIdentifies the research question implied in the study.

10.0 pts

Correctly identifies the research question in the study, or identifies the implied question, or indicates that no research question was given.

9.0 pts

Mostly identifies the research question that the author described.

8.0 pts

Somewhat identifies the research question that the author described.

4.0 pts

Offers a research question, but incorrectly identifies it.

0.0 pts

Does not identify any research question.

10.0 pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeQuestion 13 Research DesignDescribes the research design of the study.

10.0 pts

Correctly describes the research design of the study.

9.0 pts

Mostly describes the research design of the study.

8.0 pts

Somewhat describes the research design of the study.

4.0 pts

Offers a research design, but incorrectly identifies it.

0.0 pts

Does not identify any research design.

10.0 pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeQuestion 14 PopulationIdentifies and describes the population.

10.0 pts

Correctly identifies and describes in detail the population of the research article.

9.0 pts

Mostly describes identifies and describes the population of the research article.

8.0 pts

Somewhat identifies and describes the population of the research article.

4.0 pts

Offers a population, but incorrectly identifies it as the one in the research article.

0.0 pts

Does not identify any population.

10.0 pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeQuestion 15 SampleWas the sample adequate for the research design?

10.0 pts

Correctly explains if the sampling approach was appropriate for the research design studied, and if it was adequate.

9.0 pts

Correctly explains if the sampling approach was appropriate for the research design studied, but fails to correctly identify if it was adequate.

8.0 pts

Correctly explains the sampling approach, but incorrectly identifies if it was, or was not, appropriate or adequate.

4.0 pts

Misidentifies the sampling approach.

0.0 pts

Doesn’t explain any sampling approach.

10.0 pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeQuestion 16 Data CollectionDescribe the data collection procedure.

10.0 pts

Correctly describes the data collection procedure in detail.

9.0 pts

Correctly describes the data collection procedure in general.

8.0 pts

Correctly describes most of the data collection procedure but fails to describe all of it.

4.0 pts

Incorrectly describes the data collection procedure, or omits most of the information.

0.0 pts

Does not describe any data collection procedures.

10.0 pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeQuestion 17 Data AnalysisHow were the data analyzed?

10.0 pts

Correctly describes how the all of the data were analyzed.

9.0 pts

Correctly describes how most of the data were analyzed.

8.0 pts

Describes how the data were analyzed, but may contain some misinformation.

4.0 pts

Describes incorrectly how data were analyzed, or omitted large portions of the information.

0.0 pts

Does not describe how data were analyzed.

10.0 pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeQuestion 18 LimitationsDescribes the limitations in the study.

10.0 pts

Correctly describes all of the limitations in the study.

9.0 pts

Correctly describes most of the limitations in the study.

8.0 pts

Correctly describes some of the limitations in the study, but may omit one or two.

4.0 pts

Minimally describes the limitations of the study, or misidentifies them.

0.0 pts

Does not describe any limitations for the study.

10.0 pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeQuestion 19 ConclusionsDescribes the authors’ conclusions.

10.0 pts

Correctly describes all of the authors’ conclusions.

9.0 pts

Correctly describes most of the authors’ conclusions.

8.0 pts

Correctly describes some of the authors’ conclusions, but may omit one or two.

4.0 pts

Minimally describes the author’s conclusions, or misidentifies them.

0.0 pts

Does not describe any author conclusions.

10.0 pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeQuestion 20 Advances KnowledgeHow does this advance knowledge in the field.

10.0 pts

Describes in-depth how this research advances knowledge in the field.

9.0 pts

Generally, describes how this research advances knowledge.

8.0 pts

Briefly describes how this research advances knowledge in the field.

4.0 pts

Incorrectly describes how this research advances knowledge in the field.

0.0 pts

Does not describe how the research advances knowledge in the field.

10.0 pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeStyle and WritingNames file, includes name on paper. Writes in complete sentences with no grammar, spelling, or syntax errors.

25.0 pts

Correctly names file, includes name on paper. Writes in complete sentences with no grammar, spelling, or syntax errors.

22.0 pts

One to four errors in grammar, spelling, and syntax.

20.0 pts

Five to eight errors in grammar, spelling, and syntax.

10.0 pts

Nine to twelve errors in grammar, spelling, and syntax

0.0 pts

Thirteen or more errors in grammar, spelling, and syntax.

25.0 pts

Total Points: 225.0

Tags: evidence based CHAMBERLAIN This assignment is very detail and required apecific answers to the various questions Also the assignment has an attache video writen instructios that require review

User generated content is uploaded by users for the purposes of learning and should be used following Studypool's honor code & terms of service.

Explanation & Answer

Hey buddy ? Find the attached file. In case you need any edits and amendments feel free to ask. It is always a pleasure serving you. See you soon. Remember me always

Chamberlain College of Nursing

NR439: Evidence-Based Practice

Reading Research Literature – Week 5
The following questions pertain to:
Velayutham, S. G., Chandra, S. R., Bharath, S., & Shankar, R. G. (2017). Quantitative balance and
gait measurement in patients with frontotemporal dementia and Alzheimer diseases: A pilot
study. Indian Journal of Psychological Medicine, 39(2), 176-182. doi:10.4103/02537176.203132
http://proxy.chamberlain.edu:8080/login?url=http://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db
=a9h&AN=122248443&site=eds-live&scope=site
1) What is the purpose of this research?
The key purpose of this research is to estajblish if diagnostic testing of balance and gate are
benefit in the early diagnoss of AD; Alzeihmer’s Disease and FTD; frontotemmporal Dementia. By
the use of this technique, its is expected that, early detection of the above-mentioned diseases will
promote a specific plan of treatment sonce gait and balance are capable of preventing falls in these
populations in the future.
2) What is the research question (or questions)? This may be implicit or explicit.
Do specific areas of gait and balance get affected in individuals diagnosed with
frontotemmporal Dementia and Alzeihmer’s Disease? Is this information useful in developing a
care plan to prevent falls in the future?
3) Give a complete description of the research design of this study.
This is a quantitative research design as it employs the use of specific numbers and
percentages in making comparisons of studies in gait and balance. To add on, it is rather evident
that, 3 cohort groups with similar characteristics were compared.
4) What is the population (sample) for this study.

NR439_W5_Reading_Research_Literature_Form.docx

5/4/17 jw

1

Chamberlain College of Nursing

NR439: Evidence-Based Practice

The sample population for this study consisted of 3 cogort groups of eight men, who were
aged between 50-70 years. The first cohort...