Additional notes to Mr. Syafiq's assignment sample of the casp done in table form but to note there is a remark column Arrange Author Referencing Study Design Article Title (A) YES NO REMARKS CANT TELL 1 Are the results of the trial valid? 1. Did the review addressed a clearly focused question? 1. The population studied Population studied Antwer 16 The stervention gives Intervention given Aurwer 1. The comparatores Comparator Aswat Full image (464K) | าน { and this is a seperate table to be done for each articles as well Author/date Aims Methods Findings Strengths Weaknesses Full image (534K) |- าน { ..ll 中国移动4G 6:31 PM 1 91% Questions Yes Can't Tell No Remarks ere a clear statement of of the research? litative methodology ate? e research design ate to address the aims earch? The authors stated that their objective was to assess patients responses to opt out incentivized and mandatory testing to identify factors that might motivate individuals to undergo testing The purpose of the study was to understand patients' perspectives toward HIV testing to de the research question Given the qualitative nature of the study. The researchers had justified semi-structure inten to meet the aims of the research assess patients responses to opt-out, incentivited and mandatory testing to identity factors that might motivate individuals to undergo testing The authors utilised convenience Sampling as a recruitment strategy and indicated his indusion criteria. However, there were so justification of the selected particicants from the seronegative group or why the samples were recruited via first come first ever there was not a fal distribution of ethnicity among the participants The authors did not explain aplictly how the data was collected ſeg. No indication of where the private room was located. There was no justification of the topic guide that was used. There is no mention of any data saturation It was not mentioned. ne recruitment strategy ate to the aims of the 2 he data collected in a way ressed the research me relationship between wer and participants been mely considered? HELP IMPROVE OMG 75 w - 7L 누 L WeChat will 4G 6:33 PM @ 1 90% Tap anywhere to dismiss thesis Bline Print Translate Find 2 Hell Author Date tum et al. 2016) Alms Methods Findings Strength Weaknesses Assess the prevalence Cross sectional survey Top three reasons for Fill in the current gaps Potential for sodal of HIV/STtesting conducted between not seeing HIV testing in knowledge desirabilty bias mong heterosexual March and May 2015. despite engaging in pertaining to HIV men patronising high risk xual testing behaviour Cross-cacial approach entertainment 604 participants behaviour are: among heterosexual may not be able to establishments who men who engage in conclude or deduce creased in cousal or Singapore citizens or Self-perceived as low paid or casual sex casual relationibus aid sex in Singapore, permanent resident. risk 40,4%) which is an increasingly and actors associated important poup HIV Questionnaire have not with this behaviour Two entertainment Safe sex practice transmission in A been fully validated to establishments 128.139 assess HIV inowidge Clarke Quay and Generalisable to the among heternal Tanjang Pajar Stigmatisation and targeted population in man Sign discrimination (12.99) Singapore Huh response rate 100. ANI I et al20131 Mentily portant Otabeli wadah Warrestone Fosgroup interw nicht Sample was not watkall OF PROVO e SUS I - 7L 누 L
Purchase answer to see full attachment