Write 6-8 pages double spaced about question number 5

User Generated

znkvab

Writing

Description

The informations should be gotten form the books (I have both of the E-books)

The answer should be answered clearly and in full details. I will be graded in how clearly I am. Also, I want the pages number you get the informations from in this website by itself so I can check it.

Answer Question Number 5 in the attached.


Unformatted Attachment Preview

HISTORY OF POLITICAL PHILOSOPHY II Political Science 426/ Philosophy 427 Spring, 2018 First Paper Topics Write an essay answering one of the following questions or talk with me about a topic of your own. The paper should be 6-8 pages long, typed and double-spaced, and is due on or before 5:00 P.M., Wednesday, February 21st. The paper is worth 100 possible points and will be evaluated on the basis of your ability to address the specifics of the question and to interpret textual passages that help support your argument. Lacking a good excuse, late papers will be penalized 10 points-per-day. \ 1. For Hobbes, what features of our "natural" condition mean that the exercise of our natural rights, especially the right of private judgment, will create such a fearful condition as the state of nature? Why does he think that it is rational to abandon our natural right and to create an absolute sovereign even if that undermines our immediate self-interest? Where, if at all, does he go wrong in his approach to political obligation? Explain. 2. Why do both Hobbes and Locke appeal to a "state of nature"? What do those appeals share in terms of moral and epistemological commitments? How do their accounts of the "state of nature" nonetheless differ with regard to natural rights, natural law, and the character of life without government? Which of the two is more plausible? Explain. 3. Locke - para. 50: "Men have agreed to disproportionate and unequal possession of the earth." Locke - para. 131: "No rational creature can be supposed to change his condition for the worse." Is there an inconsistency here? How do Locke and others like Smith try to square the existence of private property and economic inequality with commitments to moral equality and equal legal and political rights. How successful are they? How successful could anyone be with that argument? Explain. 4. Locke uses the concept of "property" in both the common and narrow sense and in an extended sense in which it refers to "lives and liberties" as well as estates (paras. 87 & 123, e.g.). How could today's liberals and conservatives both draw support for their understandings of the proper role of government in the marketplace by focusing on one or the other of those definitions? Which move seems most in line with Locke s general spirit? Explain. f) 5. Compare Hobbes's and Locke's approach to the question of how the state should deal with religious disputes. Analyze one or two of Locke's arguments in f avor of a broad toleration of religious differences. Can his requirement of public "neutrality" with regard to most religious commitments be extended to other sorts of ethical disputes? How would a critic of toleration respond to his arguments? What is your general view of this matter? Explain. ©Hobbes defines natural and civil freedom as the ability to act on and satisfy one's desires in "the absence of Opposition" from either "external impediments" or the "Artificial Chains, called Civill Lowes. To what arguments about freedom is he responding? How does this "negative" conception of freedom figure in the more general theories of Hobbes and Locke? Are there any important considerations that it ignores? Explain.
Purchase answer to see full attachment
User generated content is uploaded by users for the purposes of learning and should be used following Studypool's honor code & terms of service.

Explanation & Answer

Attached.

Running head: RELIGIOUS DISPUTES

1

Religious Disputes
Institution Affiliation
Date

RELIGIOUS DISPUTES

2
Introduction

Religious disputes are a common phenomenon in the Commonwealth countries as well as
in other countries. This occurs because there are different religious groups as well as individuals
who are not affiliated to any. This difference results in disagreements in the laws sector as to what
is the position of the church in the governance and equally the position of the government in the
management. Different philosophers try to explain these conflicts from the early centuries and in
the current generations. Hobbes and Locke’s are notable authors of the 17th centuries who try to
define these relationships. Religion is regarded as one of the controversial issues in the laws as
different people have different affiliations. In the recent past, different religion has even broken
further each religion with its own subsections. For example, the Christian religions have very many
different denominations which follow the teachings of Christ but they have a different cultural
setting. Most of this subdivisions have been caused by various internal and external disputes due
to various ideological differences on management, political affiliations, and ways of worshiping,
a different interpretation of the scriptures among others. Most governments, on the other hand,
have not been able to settle various disputes surrounding the running of religions such as
management, taxation, registration, freedom of worship among others.
The conflicts in the church, for example, have resulted in various calamities with some
members of the church killing each other while others bad mouthing their fellow worshipers. Most
of the churches have been accused to divert their worship from God to otherworldly things such
as properties, money, and political leaders. Other conflicts in the church include issues of tithing,
poor relationships between members, and poor relationship between leaders. There is also major
conflict arising from the control of church wealth whereby most churches control great wealth as
donated by the followers. In order to mend these conflicts, proper conflict solving mechanisms
need to be put into place.
Hobbes and Locke’s Approach on State with Religious Disputes
Hobbes and Locke’s are regarded as great philosophers of the 17th Century who in great
depth contributed greatly to the civic revolutions in the 18th and 19th centuries. They operated
within a common political environment which was regarded as increased conflicts of interests in
the political and the religious environments. The religious environment mostly comprised the
Orthodox, Presbyterian, Catholics and the Anglican who had a contrasting political affiliation. In
one instance King Chase I conflicted greatly with the parliament where the Parliament declined

RELIGIOUS DISPUTES

3

approval of funding for the war on Spain and the different denominations had different affiliations
with some on the Kingside and others on the parliamentary actions. The king himself selected the
orthodox dogma by openly supporting its Archbishop. In the Literature Hobbes and Locke’s had
different approaches regarding the state approach to the religious disputes. They both advocated
different methods of solving the religious conflict.
Hobbes Approach
According to Hobbes (2006), Hobbes approaches the religious conflict in that everything
that is displeasing to the law is displeasing to God. He defines that God establishes his will upon
men by the use of an individual with who he has placed sovereign authority (Hobbes, 2006). By
referring to the various Kings in the bible lik...

Related Tags