Death By Fire Watch the Frontline PBS film "Death by Fire" (2010). After viewing, answer the following questions in a 2 page Essay: Is it morally permissible to execute an individual with little evidence?The imposition of capital punishment has been marred by errors in convictions, racial discrimination, and other problems in its administration over the years. Do you believe these problems will ever be eliminated? If they were eliminated, would it be permissible to use capital punishment more frequently as a punishment for severe crimes?Do you think it was morally right to execute Todd Willingham? Why or why not? Is this good from a utilitarian point of view? Be sure to address all prompts and cite your sources in APA format.Website Link to "Deathe by Fire" http://www.pbs.org/wgbh/pages/frontline/death-by-fire/

There are several remedies in Title VII that federal courts can order. Those include injunctions against unlawful practices, affirmative orders requiring the reinstatement of employees, the awarding of back pay, front pay, and seniority rights. If and when those actions are taken by federal courts depends on the facts and outcome of each individual case. Write a description of an imaginary case or scenario regarding an unlawful employment practice committed by an employer upon one or more employees. Then state a detailed remedy and explain why you choose that remedy. Submit an essay containing: A minimum of 2 pages (counting body text only, not title or reference pages) that is double-spaced with one-inch margins on all sides.You will be assessed on the rationale you use in addressing the question/issue posted, and how well you justify your argument regarding this issue.Your response must be thought provoking, have well developed ideas and/or opinions, and should reference any supporting material from the text, lecture, or other sources you have used to complete the assignment.

(4a) Consider the various ways that criminal justice management can respond or prepare for various ethical questions and issues. Please read APPENDIX D American Correctional Association Code of EthicsPREAMBLE and discuss their code of ethics in your initial post. What does this code say?Then, try to locate a news story in which someone has violated this code of ethics. What was management's response to this violation? APPENDIX D American Correctional Association Code of EthicsPREAMBLEThe American Correctional Association expects of its members unfailing honesty, respect for the dignity and individuality of human beings and a commitment to professional and compassionate service. To this end, we subscribe to the following principles.  Members shall respect and protect the civil and legal rights of all individuals. Members shall treat every professional situation with concern for the welfare of the individuals involved and with no intent to personal gain. Members shall maintain relationships with colleagues to promote mutual respect within the profession and improve the quality of service. Members shall make public criticism of their colleagues or their agencies only when warranted, verifiable, and constructive. Members shall respect the importance of all disciplines within the criminal justice system and work to improve cooperation with each segment. Members shall honor the public’s right to information and share information with the public to the extent permitted by law subject to individual’s right to privacy. Members shall respect and protect the right of the public to be safeguarded from criminal activity. Members shall refrain from using their positions to secure personal privileges or advantages. Members shall refrain from allowing personal interest to impair objectivity in the performance of duty while acting in an official capacity. Members shall refrain from entering into any formal or informal activity or agreement which presents a conflict of interest or is inconsistent with the conscientious performance of duties. Members shall refrain from accepting any gifts, service, or favor that is or appears to be improper or implies an obligation inconsistent with the free and objective exercise of professional duties. Members shall clearly differentiate between personal views/statements and views/statements/positions made on behalf of the agency or Association. Members shall report to appropriate authorities any corrupt or unethical behaviors in which there is sufficient evidence to justify review. Members shall refrain from discriminating against any individual because of race, gender, creed, national origin, religious affiliation, age, disability, or any other type of prohibited discrimination. Members shall preserve the integrity of private information; they shall refrain from seeking information on individuals beyond that which is necessary to implement responsibilities and perform their duties; members shall refrain from revealing nonpublic information unless expressly authorized to do so. Members shall make all appointments, promotions, and dismissals in accordance with established civil service rules, applicable contract agreements, and individual merit, rather than furtherance of personal interests. Members shall respect, promote, and contribute to a work place that is safe, healthy, and free of harassment in any form. Note: Adopted August 1975 at the 105th Congress of Correction, revised August 1990 at the 120th Congress of Correction, revised August 1994 at the 124th Congress of CorrectionSource: www.bmi.net/wca/ethics_code.html