In Assignments 2.1 (Part 1) and 2.2 (Part 2) of the Justification Report, you built up the major parts of your formal, researched justification report (Problem Statement, Overview of Alternatives, Criteria, Methods, Evaluation of Alternatives, Findings and Analysis, and References). You will begin Part 3 by inserting your revisions of Parts 1 and 2 based on your instructor's suggestions. Then, you will include a few new additions:Use the basic outline below to draft your paper. Organize your responses to each question under the following section headings: Introduction (for Question 1) Problem Statement (for Question 1a) Terminology (for Question 1b) Major Sections of the Report (for Question 1c) Scope and Limitations of the Research (for Question 1d) Preliminary Parts (for Question 2) Recommendation (for Question 3) References (for Question 4) Write a four (4) page, single-spaced report in which you:  Create an introduction that tells what your report is about. Include the Problem Statement that you already created and revised in Part 1. Include terms that readers will need to know in order to understand the report. Briefly summarize the major sections and findings of the report that you've developed in Parts 1 and 2. Discuss what your report will cover and what it will not. Create the preliminary parts of the report that precede the Introduction (after reading Chapter 12 in your Professional Communications textbook), which includes: Title Page Transmittal Table of Contents Executive SummaryNote: Use small Roman numerals to number the pages of the preliminary parts of the report. Create the Recommendation section of the Report. Provide a one to two (1-2) sentence recommendation based on what your Evaluation of Alternatives and Findings and Analysis sections have determined is the most feasible alternative (i.e. solution) to the problem in the Problem Statement. Create the References sections, which goes at the end of the Report, by pasting in your revised References page. Note: Remember to organize the report by the section headings. The report should reflect a style and format appropriate for business; single spacing and bullet points are acceptable for formal business reports. Your assignment must: Be typed, single spaced, using Times New Roman font (size 12), with one-inch margins on all sides; citations and references must follow APA or school-specific format. Check with your professor for any additional instructions. Include a cover page containing the title of the assignment, your name, the professor’s name, the course title, and the date. The cover page and the reference page are not included in the required assignment page length. The specific course learning outcomes associated with this assignment are: Support ideas or claims in body paragraphs with clear details, examples, and explanations. Organize ideas logically by using transitional words, phrases, and sentences. Use sentence variety and effective word choice in written communication. Apply writing process strategies to develop formal business reports and / or proposals. Use technology and information resources to research issues related to selected topics. Write clearly and concisely using proper writing mechanics. Click here to view the grading rubric.

Assignment 2.2: Justification Report - Part 2Due Week 5 and worth 150 pointsIn Part 1 of your Justification Report assignment, you built up the following sections: Problem Statement, Overview of Alternatives, Criteria, and Methods. In Part 2, you will revise Part 1 based on your instructor's suggestions and add to it the following sections: Evaluation of Alternatives, Findings and Analysis, and References.Use the basic outline below to draft your paper. Organize your responses to each question under the following section headings:Evaluation of Alternatives (for Questions 1-3)Findings and Analysis (for Questions 4-5)References (for Question 6)Write a two (2) page, single-spaced report in which you:Research the two (2) alternatives (i.e. possible solutions) that you've identified in your Part 1 Evaluation of Alternatives section. Record bibliographic information during research.Example: You might research other organizations that have attempted similar solutions to the problem you have identified and explore the results of those experiments. Use what you discover in your research to evaluate each alternative by each of your five (5) criteria.Example: If your research revealed that four companies similar to yours increased productivity after allowing their workers to telework from home three days per week, you might conclude that one of your suggested alternatives – in this case, the option to telework from home three days per week – satisfies one of your criterion of “Productivity” as a high-potential solution to a problem you’ve identified (of decreased worker morale and productivity at Doe’s Electronics). However, additional research might frustrate a recommendation of this alternative if it is found to fall short of other criteria while a second alternative fares better. For instance, a telework alternative might be found to be too costly to implement; too frustrating for consumers who prefer daily, in-person customer service; or too divergent from the company’s brand, “Always there for you!”Organize the assignment by your criteria. Explain in narrative form how each of your two (2) alternatives stacks up against your first criterion. Next, explain how each alternative stacks up against your second criterion, etc.Example: An abbreviated outline of what this longer section might look like based on the above example is below (Note: Only the first two [2] of five [5] required criteria are included to give you a feel for the structure). Your researched findings, represented as circled bullets below, should be explained in two to five (2-5) sentences. Include in-text citations and follow up with References in APA style):Evaluation of AlternativesProductivityAlternative A: Telework from home 3 days per week{narrate findings based on research article 1 here}Alternative B: Offer two extra Floating Holidays to each employee per year{narrate findings based on research article 2 here}CostAlternative A: Telework from home 3 days per week{narrate findings based on research article 1 here}Alternative B: Offer two extra Floating Holidays to each employee per year{narrate findings based on research article 2 here}Briefly summarize in narrative form the major discoveries that emerged from the Evaluation of Alternatives section.Include a chart like the ones below to illustrate at a glance:Figure 1: Alternatives Analyzed by CriteriaCriteriaTelework OptionFloating Holiday OptionProductivityVery highNegligible increaseCostVery highModerateCompany ImageIncreasedNegligible increaseWorker MoraleIncreasedNegligible increasePracticalityModerateLowTOTAL Feasibility* of Alternatives based on Criteria?Moderate to HighLow to Moderate*Feasability = Capability of an alternative being carried out with successInclude an APA style (6th edition) References page that documents the two (2) sources (minimum) that you used and cited in-text in your Evaluation of Alternatives section.  Note that both resources may be secondary resources, or you may include one primary source and one secondary source. Remember that both in-text citations and References must be included (to avoid plagiarism) whenever you are directly quoting, summarizing, or paraphrasing researched material.Your assignment must:Be typed, single spaced, using Times New Roman font (size 12), with one-inch margins on all sides; citations and references must follow APA or school-specific format. Check with your professor for any additional instructions.Include a cover page containing the title of the assignment, your name, the professor’s name, the course title, and the date. The cover page and the reference page are not included in the required assignment page length.The specific course learning outcomes associated with this assignment are:Support ideas or claims in body paragraphs with clear details, examples, and explanations.Organize ideas logically by using transitional words, phrases, and sentences.Use sentence variety and effective word choice in written communication.Apply writing process strategies to develop formal business reports and / or proposals.Use technology and information resources to research issues related to selected topics.Write clearly and concisely using proper writing mechanics.Consider the feedback from your professor and / or online tutor when making your revisions. view the grading rubric.Points: 150Assignment 2.2: Justification Report – Part 2CriteriaUnacceptableBelow 60% FMeets Minimum Expectations60-69% DFair70-79% CProficient80-89% BExemplary90-100% A1. Research the two (2) alternatives (i.e. possible solutions) that you’ve identified in your Part 1 Evaluation of Alternatives section. Record bibliographic information during research.Weight: 20%Did not submit or incompletely researched the two (2) alternatives (i.e. possible solutions) that you’ve identified in your Part 1 Evaluation of Alternatives section. Did not submit or incompletely recorded bibliographic information during research.Insufficiently researched the two (2) alternatives (i.e. possible solutions) that you’ve identified in your Part 1 Evaluation of Alternatives section.Insufficientlyrecorded bibliographic information during research.Partially researched the two (2) alternatives (i.e. possible solutions) that you’ve identified in your Part 1 Evaluation of Alternatives section. Partiallyrecorded bibliographic information during research.Satisfactorily researched the two (2) alternatives (i.e. possible solutions) that you’ve identified in your Part 1 Evaluation of Alternatives section.Satisfactorilyrecorded bibliographic information during research.Thoroughly researched the two (2) alternatives (i.e. possible solutions) that you’ve identified in your Part 1 Evaluation of Alternatives section.Thoroughlyrecorded bibliographic information during research.2. Use what you discover in your research to evaluate each alternative by each of your five (5) criteria.Weight: 20%Did not submit or incompletely used what you discover in your research to evaluate each alternative by each of your five (5) criteria.Insufficiently usedwhat you discover in your research to evaluate each alternative by each of your five (5) criteria.Partially usedwhat you discover in your research to evaluate each alternative by each of your five (5) criteria.Satisfactorily used what you discover in your research to evaluate each alternative by each of your five (5) criteria.Thoroughly used what you discover in your research to evaluate each alternative by each of your five (5) criteria.3. Organize the assignment by your criteria. Explain in narrative form how each of your two (2) alternatives stacks up against your first criterion. Next, explain how each alternative stacks up against your second criterion, etc.Weight: 10%Did not submit or incompletely organized the assignment by your criteria. Did not submit or incompletely explained in narrative form how each of your two (2) alternatives stacks up against your first criterion. Did not submit or incompletely explained how each alternative stacks up against your second criterion, etc.Insufficiently organized the assignment by your criteria.Insufficientlyexplained in narrative form how each of your two (2) alternatives stacks up against your first criterion.Insufficientlyexplained how each alternative stacks up against your second criterion, etc.Partially organized the assignment by your criteria.Partiallyexplained in narrative form how each of your two (2) alternatives stacks up against your first criterion.Partiallyexplained how each alternative stacks up against your second criterion, etc.Satisfactorily organized the assignment by your criteria.Satisfactorilyexplained in narrative form how each of your two (2) alternatives stacks up against your first criterion.Satisfactorilyexplained how each alternative stacks up against your second criterion, etc.Thoroughly organized the assignment by your criteria.Thoroughlyexplained in narrative form how each of your two (2) alternatives stacks up against your first criterion.Thoroughlyexplained how each alternative stacks up against your second criterion, etc.4. Briefly summarize in narrative form the major discoveries that emerged from the Evaluation of Alternativessection.Weight: 10%Did not submit or incompletely summarized in narrative form the major discoveries that emerged from the Evaluation of Alternativessection.Insufficiently summarized in narrative form the major discoveries that emerged from theEvaluation of Alternativessection.Partially summarized in narrative form the major discoveries that emerged from the Evaluation of Alternativessection.Satisfactorily summarized in narrative form the major discoveries that emerged from the Evaluation of Alternativessection.Thoroughly summarized in narrative form the major discoveries that emerged from the Evaluation of Alternativessection.5. Include a relevant chart representing the feasibility of each alternativeWeight: 10%Did not submit or incompletely Included a relevant chart representing the feasibility of each alternative.Insufficiently Included a relevant chart representing the feasibility of each alternative.Partially Included a relevant chart representing the feasibility of each alternative.Satisfactorily Included a relevant chart representing the feasibility of each alternative.Thoroughly Included a relevant chart representing the feasibility of each alternative.6. 4 ReferencesWeight: 5%No references provided.Insufficiently included the required number of references; all references poor quality choices.Partially included the required number of references; some references poor quality choices.Satisfactorily included the required number of references; some references poor quality choices.Thoroughly included required number of references; all references high quality choices.7. Clarity, writing mechanics, and formatting requirements.Weight: 25%More than 8 errors present7-8 errors present5-6 errors present3-4 errors present0-2 errors present

HUMA.doc I need 5 pages essay about Gilgamesh , chose one of these themes to write about , you have to read  ( THE NORTON ANTHOLOGY WORLD LITERATURE ) to know about Gligamesh . and you have to follow the rules on the attachment  that I posted Major Themes Love and Friendship When we first meet Gilgamesh, he is a tyrant king who terrifies the people of Uruk. Only after meeting Enkidu and becoming his friend does Gilgamesh transform into a hero worthy of memory. This transformative effect is also exacted on Enkidu, who Gilgamesh helps move beyond his fears. The platonic love the two have for each other helps Gilgamesh become a better leader to his people by allowing him to better understand and identify with them. When considered in tandem with the theme of death in the poem, love and friendship can be viewed not only as a part of life, but as a necessary component to give existence meaning. Death The major theme of the poem is that of mortality. Gilgamesh must learn the difficult lesson that, even as a king, he too must face the reality of his own death. On their way to the Cedar Forst to face Humbaba, Enkidu expresses his concerns about death, which Gilgamesh laughs off, telling Enkidu that no one lives forever and that life is short. However, when Enkidu dies, Gilgamesh is so distraught that he seeks out Utnapishtim to learn the secret of immortality. Despite his hopes, Utnapishtim tells Gilgamesh the story of the flood. He explains to Gilgamesh that the quest for immortality is a futile one, as creation itself also contains the seed of death, making it inescapable. The Gods, he explains, intentionally did this. Gilgamesh returns to Uruk having learned that the quality of one’s life is measured not by wealth or fame, but by the quality of the time he spent while alive and the people with which he surrounded himself. The Hero's Journey or Quest A common theme in mythology and ancient stories, Gilgamesh’s story is no exception. The hero must embark on a journey or quest in order to discover who he is. Initially, Enkidu travels from the wilderness with Shamhat to civilization to meet Gilgamesh. Gilgamesh begins his quest with Enkidu by traveling to the Cedar Forest to defeat Humbaba. After Enkidu’s death, Gilgamesh’s personal journey begins. He seeks out Utnapishtim to learn the secret of immortality. His journey concludes with his return to Uruk. In this case, Gilgamesh’s journey is a direct reflection of his internal struggle and “journey” to become a better, selfless leader. The Wrath of the Gods Gilgamesh expresses his jealousy towards the gods and the immortality they enjoy. He and Enkidu learn firsthand that incurring the wrath of the gods can have disastrous consequences. Rather than wise, omniscient beings, the gods in Gilgamesh are vengeful and easily angered. Gilgamesh and Enkidu first encounter this wrath after Gilgamesh rejects Ishtar’s advances. Ishtar immediately turns to her father, Anu, to send the Bull of Heaven to punish Gilgamesh. At first, Anu rejects Ishtar’s request but she threatens to raise the dead to devour the living. Anu is frightened by Ishtar’s threat and releases the Bull of Heaven to appease her. When Gilgamesh and Enkidu slay the Bull of Heaven, they further insult Ishtar by throwing the Bull’s hindquarters at her face. Enkidu later dreams that the gods have decided that he must die for these transgressions. After twelve days of suffering, he dies a painful death. Utnapishtim also tells Gilgamesh the story of a great flood exacted on the people of Shurrupak. Ea informs Utnapishtim of the coming flood and instructs him to build a great boat and to stock that boat with all the creatures of the land. It is important to note that when Utnapishtim asks Ea about why the flood is coming and about whathe should tell the people of Shurrupak, Ea has no specific answer for him, stating only that Enlil is angry. This suggests that the wrath of the gods can also be incurred without any obvious insult or explanation. Gateways Gateways and doors by their very nature symbolize separation, but also transition. Although a physical doorway is not present in the beginning, Enkidu must transition from the wilderness to civilization. In this sense, Shamhat herself represents a gateway. Enkidu then enters Uruk with Shamhat, passing through the city’s great walls. Enkidu and Gilgamesh later discuss Enkidu’s fear at the gate to the Cedar Forest. They cut down the tallest tree in the forest to make into a gate for Uruk. On his journey to find Utnapishtim, Gilgamesh must pass through the gate of Mashu, guarded by the Scorpion men. At each point when a gateway is encountered, a decision must be made by Gilgamesh or Enkidu as to whether they will continue or turn back. Utilized in this manner, gateways also serve as an effective literary device to force characters to make decisions that affect the overall narrative. Baptism or Ritual Cleansing Water is continually used by characters in Gilgamesh at key points in the story to wash themselves but also marks an important point of transition. In this way, water is used in a baptismal manner. Enkidu washes himself after meeting Shamhat, marking his transition from the wilderness to civilization. Gilgamesh and Enkidu wash themselves after slaying the Bull of Heaven. Gilgamesh bathes himself after acquiring the magic plant to achieve immortality. In each case, a ritual cleansing marks an important moment in the story. Enkidu is transformed, leaving behind the world of animals and nature and entering the world of humans. Gilgamesh loses the magic plant but transitions to accepting his mortality. Responsibility Gilgamesh is introduced to us as a tyrant king who does as he pleases and has little regard for his subjects. Aruru creates Enkidu to strike a balance against Gilgamesh’s tyrannical ways. His purpose in the story is to help Gilgamesh become the king he needs to be and to teach him about what is most valuable in life. Through this ordeal, Gilgamesh loses his best friend and must face reality. The recklessness with which he previously had lived his life is evidently unsustainable. Gilgamesh learns that just as he will not live forever, he will age, and with that age must come maturity and wisdom if he is to live a life worth living.