Description
General Assignment Instructions
Each group project will culminate in the submission of a policy brief of 12-15 pages.
There are two ways the final project can be approached:
1) Groups can select a public service professional that currently works in a public sector organization. In the interview, inquire about the biggest challenge they are facing in their current position. Through an interview and follow-up research, groups will develop a policy brief to help propose a recommendation to improve upon the challenge faced by your group’s interviewee.
2) Groups can select a public policy issue that is of interest to the members. Groups will locate a public service professional that is currently working in a public organization on this specific issue. Through an interview and follow-up research, groups will develop a policy brief to help propose a recommendation to improve upon the selected public policy issue.
.Your policy brief is expected to be informed by thorough background research as well as an interview with someone who works in the public sector. Some best practices for structuring and achieving such interactions will be provided by the instructor. Each project should cover the following four areas. Be careful to read the instructions for each section thoroughly before beginning your projects Each policy brief should cover the following four areas:
- Definition of the Challenge or Problem: You should begin by clearly defining the problem or challenge under consideration. This includes identifying the issue, defining its parameters (i.e. discussing the scope, magnitude, and extent of the problem), and discussing any known or perceived causes of the problem. Your problem definition should be empirical, comprehensive, and non-biased. In other words, you should look at the problem from all relevant perspectives, present those perspectives fairly, and do so in an empirically sound manner.
- Identification of Relevant Stakeholders and Actors: Next you should clearly define the affected community. This includes identifying all stakeholders who are impacted by the problem and what their primary concerns/perspectives are. It’s important to consider all groups and individuals who might impact and/or be impacted by the problem, regardless of whether the impact is considered to be primary, secondary, or tertiary.
- Identification and Analysis of Alternatives: You should review the evidence gathered through your research, including alternative solutions, potential effectiveness, best practices, etc. This is where you discuss potential actions that can be taken in/by the affected communities, what the potential pros/cons (i.e. costs and benefits) of those actions are, and what’s been learned about these potential actions in other communities. This discussion should be evidence-based and should be informed by both your background research and your discussions/interactions with your selected interviewee.
- Recommendations and Rationale: Finally, your policy brief should conclude with a series of evidence-based recommendations. This should include a list of actions that you recommend the affected institutions, organizations, and/or communities may take in order to address the problem. Group recommendations should be directly relevant to the assigned problem and communities (as defined in the first two sections of your paper), and they should be informed by your research and discussed in light of the relevant evaluative criteria (i.e. cost/benefit, efficiency, effectiveness, equity, feasibility, etc.).
Unformatted Attachment Preview
Purchase answer to see full attachment
Explanation & Answer
Attached.
1
Public Service Issue
Name
Affiliation
Course
Date
2
Bureaucracy and Red Tape
Definition of the Challenge or Problem
Bureaucracy and red tape can present significant demanding situations in public provider
groups, affecting the efficiency and accessibility of services. Bureaucracy refers to a process of
government activities characterized by a hierarchical shape, specialized roles, and a fixed of
policies and strategies that govern selection-making and behavior (Bozeman, 1993). On the other
hand, red tape refers to immoderate or unnecessary bureaucratic methods that may prevent the
effective functioning of public services and limit access to citizen rights (Bozeman, 1993). Even
as vital for better structure and accountability, bureaucracy can be cumbersome if not controlled
efficaciously. The hierarchical nature and specialized roles may additionally result in slow
choice-making and a lack of flexibility in responding to citizens' desires. Then, red tape
represents immoderate administrative procedures that can restrict service delivery. Prolonged
approval approaches, excessive paperwork, and rigid rules can hinder citizens from accessing
their rights and vital offerings (Bozeman, 1993).
The scope of bureaucracy and red tape is significant within the realm of public service
organizations and government administration. Bureaucracy encompasses a hierarchical structure,
delineating specialized roles and responsibilities, guiding decision-making processes, and
facilitating the implementation of government policies and programs (Walker et al., 2010). It
involves resource allocation, managing budgets, personnel, and assets, while also enforcing
accountability and oversight mechanisms. However, the excessive presence of red tape can
hinder effective service delivery by burdening public agencies with unnecessary bureaucratic
procedures (Walker et al., 2010). Red tape may involve excessive paperwork, lengthy approval
processes, and rigid rules and regulations, leading to inefficiencies and delays in providing
3
essential services. Addressing red tape is crucial to streamline administrative processes, improve
service accessibility, and enhance overall efficiency in public service organizations (Walker et
al., 2010).
The magnitude of bureaucracy and red tape can vary significantly across government and
public service organizations. Bureaucracy's extent is influenced by factors such as the
organizational size, the number of rules and procedures governing decision-making and
operations, and the scope of functions performed (Walker et al., 2010). Larger organizations with
complex hierarchies and numerous specialized roles often exhibit higher bureaucratic magnitude.
On the other hand, red tape's magnitude relates to the degree of excessive and unnecessary
bureaucratic procedures that hinder efficient service delivery (Walker et al., 2010). The presence
of numerous bureaucratic obstacles, such as excessive paperwork, lengthy approval processes,
and rigid regulations, can contribute to the magnitude of red tape, causing inefficiencies and
delays in providing essential services. It is essential for organizations to strike a balance between
an effective bureaucratic structure that ensures accountability and the need to minimize red tape
to optimize service accessibility and efficiency (Walker et al., 2010).
Causes of the Bureaucracy and Red tape
One of the primary causes of red tape in public service organizations is the presence of
complex and rigid bureaucratic structures. These hierarchical systems often entail intricate chains
of command, specialized roles, and numerous layers of decision-making (Walker et al., 2010). As
a result, navigating administrative processes becomes cumbersome, and obtaining necessary
approvals or information can be a time-consuming challenge. The rigid nature of these structures
may hinder adaptability and responsiveness to evolving needs, leading to inefficiencies and
delays in service delivery (Walker et al. 2010).
4
Another key aspect that results in red tape is conflicting administrative values, where the
pursuit of one value, such as efficiency or accountability, can create excessive guidelines and
methods that avert the success of different values (access or equity). For instance, software
designed to cast off waste, fraud, and abuse may inadvertently create red tape that limits access
to benefits for legitimately entitled citizens (Walker et al., 2010). In addition, the lack of
information on the effect of sophisticated guidelines on citizens is also a factor causing red tape.
Managers can be blind to the compliance burden that regulations impose on citizens or may not
fully recognize the poor results of red tape on the accessibility of public services. This can result
in creating unnecessarily complicated or burdensome rules that restrict citizen participation in
public services. Also, intentional policy design choices can also contribute to the creation of red
tape (Moynihan & Herd, 2010). For example, policymakers may design rules that are
intentionally difficult to navigate in order to limit access to certain services or benefits. This can
be done for political or ideological reasons, or to limit the financial burden of public programs.
The lack of systematic theoretical thinking about red tape has contributed significantly to
the uncertainty surrounding this issue. According to the Boozeman (1993), when organizational
concepts are underdeveloped and problems related to bureaucracy become severe, the tendency
is to prioritize prescribing solutions rather than thoroughly understanding the root causes of red
tape. In essence, the neglect of comprehendi...
