Humanities
ESL533 Grand Canyon 7th Grade Class Azella Scores Proficiency Level Analysis

ESL533

Grand Canyon University

Question Description

Details:

Analyze the proficiency level data in the “Ms. Jensen’s 7th Grade Class AZELLA Scores” document to place the students into appropriate groups for in-class activities.

In a 500-750-word essay, describe how you would group these students for in-class English language arts activities. Include a rationale for your choices.

Support this assignment with three scholarly resources.

Prepare this assignment according to the guidelines found in the APA Style Guide

RESOURCES

1. Textbook: Making Content Comprehensible for English Learners

Review Chapter 11 and read Chapter 12.

2. Guide to Navigating and Using AZELLA Reports

Read the “Guide to Navigating and Using AZELLA Reports,” located on the Arizona

Department of Education website.

https://cms.azed.gov/home/GetDocumentFile?id=585073c0aadebe0988f82bda

Attached is the different ELL levels so you can review for this assignment. I also attached an example of this assignment, DO NOT USE and the template to use to complete this assignment.


Unformatted Attachment Preview

ELL Proficiency Levels Level 1 - Basic Students at this level have very limited or no understanding of English. They rarely use English for communication. They can respond non-verbally to commands, statements and questions in simple form. As their oral comprehension increases, they begin to use simple words and phrases, and may use English spontaneously. They should be developing BICS at this level (see BICS page) Level 2 - Low Intermediate These students can understand short conversations on simple topics. They rely on familiarity. They use repetition, gestures and non-verbal cues to sustain conversation. When reading, students at this level can understand basic narrative text and authentic materials, although they will be below grade level. They rely on contextual and visual cues to aid in comprehension. They can begin to identify the main idea and supporting details of passages. They can write simple notes and make brief journal entries using basic vocabulary and common language structures. Frequent errors are characteristic at this level. Level 3 - High Intermediate At this level, students can understand standard speech delivered in most settings with some repetition and rewording. They can understand the main idea and some details of extended discourse. They can communicate orally in most settings. Students at this level can comprehend the content of many texts independently, although they still may not be on grade level. They still require support in understanding academic text. They can read many literature selections for pleasure. They can write multi-paragraph compositions, journal entries, letters and creative passages. They can present their thoughts in an organized manner, but errors may still be present. Level 4 - Proficient Students at this level have adequate language skills for day-to-day communication. Occasional structural and lexical errors still occur. They may still have difficulty with idiomatic expressions and words with multiple meanings. They may still have difficulty with complex structures and abstract academic concepts, but are able to communicate in English in new or unfamiliar settings. Students at this level write for personal and academic purposes. Structures, vocabulary and overall organization should approximate the writing of native speakers at their level. However, it is still possible for errors to occur. Level 5 - Advanced Proficient Students at this advanced level have demonstrated English proficiency as determined by state assessment instruments (ELPA -English Language Proficient Assessment). They are expected to be able to participate fully with their peers in grade level content area classes. Running head: PROFICIENCY LEVEL ANALYSIS Proficiency Level Analysis Name Grand Canyon University: ESL-533 Date 1 PROFICIENCY LEVEL ANALYSIS 2 Proficiency Level Analysis Introduction When classroom data reveals students with multiple levels of proficiency, it becomes extremely important to establish a learning environment that includes small group instruction. These “supportive classroom environments, characterized by positive and collaborative interactions with peers and teachers, are important to ELL students’ academic performance” (LeClair, Doll, Osborn & Jones, 2009, p. 570). Groups can be created based upon students’ levels of proficiency but should also be flexible to provide opportunities for students to learn from other peers who have strengths in areas different from their own. Groups for ELA Activities Since Ms. Jensen’s 7th grade class has a wide range of proficiency levels, it would be beneficial to establish multiple small groups for English Language Arts activities. One effective strategy “to improve ELs’ English reading is to provide intensified intervention in small groups to students who are struggling in a particular academic skill area as determined by performance on an assessment or other classroom data” (Martinez, Harris & McClain, 2014, p. 140). When analyzing the proficiency level of these students in reading, writing, listening, and speaking, the following groups could be established: Group 1: Aryanna, Gabriel, Michael, Petie, and Suzanne Group 2: Jakob, Jerry, and Noah Group 3: Carlos, Desiree, and Jade Group 4: Corynn, Hailey, Rebecca, and Ramon With these small groups created, the instruction, practice, and assessment could transpire in multiple formats. “By moving from whole class to small group, whole class to partners, and PROFICIENCY LEVEL ANALYSIS 3 small group to individual assignments—provides students with opportunities to learn new information, discuss it, and process it. Organizing students into smaller groups for instructional purposes provides a context that whole-class, teacher-dominated instruction doesn’t offer” (Echevarría, Vogt & Short, 2017, p. 163). By establishing the listed groups, students could work on specific skills based upon their individual needs. Grouping Strategy The groups created for Ms. Jensen’s 7th grade class are based primarily on their proficiency levels, combined with areas that each student would benefit from more targeted, intensive instruction. “In small, guided instruction groups, the teacher naturally differentiates instruction as she works on focused skill instruction, language development, and/or assessment of student progress” (Echevarría, Vogt & Short, 2017, p. 164). Students in Group 1 are all proficient in at least one category and intermediate in at least two categories. All of these students also revealed listening as an area of weakness, which could be targeted during the other small group learning activities. Students in Group 2 are all intermediate in at least three categories, revealing a fairly balanced proficiency level across all categories. Students in Group 3 are all intermediate in two of the categories. These students also revealed writing to be an area of relative weakness, which could be an area of focus during small group work time. Students in Group 4 are all emergent in at least one category, thereby establishing the need for instruction and practice in many of the more foundational components. Although these small group activities provide the opportunity for students to get intensive, direct support in specific areas of need, it will also be important that “tasks should be assigned a specific amount of time so that students stay engaged and the pace of the class moves along” (Echevarría, Vogt & Short, 2017, p. 166). Likewise, when students are working in these small group settings, it will be important PROFICIENCY LEVEL ANALYSIS 4 to establish “a positive and cooperative learning environment in which teachers grouped students together to complete assignments and incorporated students’ culture and language into the curriculum” (LeClair, Doll, Osborn & Jones, 2009, p. 570). In this manner, students will receive the support they need, with multiple learning strategies being utilized in an engaging manner. Flexible Grouping Although there are numerous benefits to small group instruction, these groups should not be stationary. “Assigning all English learners to the same group regularly is not good practice, especially when total responsibility for teaching is turned over to a paraprofessional” (Echevarría, Vogt & Short, 2017, p. 165). There are times when groups do need to be created based upon level of proficiency in a particular content area. During these times, specific skills can be targeted. However, there are also benefits from having groups formed from students of various skill levels. “It is important during explorations that English language learners work alongside their English-only peers. Having children grouped heterogeneously during inquirybased activities helps tap into children's strengths” (Hansen, 2006, p. 23). Likewise, students can benefit greatly from working alongside a peer from differing levels of proficiency. “In addition to small-group interventions, peer-assisted strategies can also be used with EL students as a way to intensify reading instruction” (Martinez, Harris & McClain, 2014, p. 140). Students can benefit greatly when teachers provide students with the opportunity of learning from each other. Likewise, this type of learning environment also provides students with the opportunity to increase in their speaking and listening utilizing both social and academic vocabulary. Conclusion When a teacher creates a classroom learning environment that utilizes multiple types of learning formats, including small group learning, it meets students’ needs from numerous PROFICIENCY LEVEL ANALYSIS 5 perspectives. “Allowing students to work together to critique or analyze material, create graphic representations of vocabulary terms or concepts, or summarize material makes information more meaningful and increases learning” (Echevarría, Vogt & Short, 2017, p. 163). Students need the opportunity to receive targeted individual instruction in a small group setting, but they also need the opportunity to practice these skills with peers who possess strengths in areas different from their own. When all of these types of learning settings are implemented into a classroom, everyone wins. PROFICIENCY LEVEL ANALYSIS 6 References Echevarria, J., Vogt, M., & Short, D. (2017). Making Content Comprehensible for English Learners. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Pearson. Hansen, L. (2006). Strategies for ELL success. Science & Children, 43(4), 22-25. LeClair, C., Doll, B., Osborn, A., & Jones, K. (2009). English language learners' and nonEnglish language learners' perceptions of the classroom environment. Psychology in the Schools, 46(6), 568-577. Martínez, R. S., Harris, B., & McClain, M. B. (2014). Practices that promote English reading for English learners (ELs). Journal of Educational & Psychological Consultation, 24(2), 128-148. doi:10.1080/10474412.2014.903192. Running head: TITLE IN ALL CAPS 1 Title Name Grand Canyon University: ESL 433 Date LEARNING GROUPS 2 Learning Groups Introduction Assigning collaborative or paired learning groups is a vital component needed to aid in the instruction and success of all students. Teachers must identify which model of grouping best suits their needs. Homogeneous grouping refers to the grouping of students of the same ability level and heterogeneous grouping is the concept of mixing the abilities of students (Johnson, 2011). This paper will discuss the benefits of heterogeneous grouping. Grouping Rationale Chart Group A Group B Group C Group D Group E Heterogeneous Grouping Write this paragraph here. I used the tab key to indent paragraphs. Write at least 3 sentences. Equality of Groups Write another paragraph here. Write at least 3 sentences. LEARNING GROUPS 3 Conclusion Write a cogent conclusion here. All paragraphs should be at least 3 paragraphs. LEARNING GROUPS 4 References Smith, M. E., Teemant, A., & Pinnegar, S. (2004). Principles and practices of sociocultural assessment: Foundations for effective strategies for linguistically diverse classrooms. Multicultural Perspectives, 6(2), 38-46. Three references here. LEARNING GROUPS 5 ...
Purchase answer to see full attachment

Final Answer

Attached.

Running Head: PROFICIENCY LEVEL ANALYSIS
1

Proficiency Level Analysis
Institution Affiliation
Date

PROFICIENCY LEVEL ANALYSIS

2

The understanding of the students’ abilities in learning is crucial for an educator. The
classification of the different levels based on their abilities becomes possible, enabling the
teacher to create a learning environment that is supportive of all the students. Essentially, the
creation of groups enables the student to relate with their fellow students, who are categorized in
their respective groups enabling them to realize improvement. The gradual improvements
accomplish the intended goal for the teacher and the students in English-language learner (ELL).
This paper provides the classification of the students and the importance of the grouping of the
student in ELL levels.
Students Grouping and Their Impo...

benwamonicah (20946)
Duke University

Anonymous
The tutor managed to follow the requirements for my assignment and helped me understand the concepts on it.

Anonymous
The tutor was knowledgeable, will be using the service again.

Anonymous
Awesome quality of the tutor. They were helpful and accommodating given my needs.

Studypool
4.7
Trustpilot
4.5
Sitejabber
4.4
Similar Questions
Related Tags

Brown University





1271 Tutors

California Institute of Technology




2131 Tutors

Carnegie Mellon University




982 Tutors

Columbia University





1256 Tutors

Dartmouth University





2113 Tutors

Emory University





2279 Tutors

Harvard University





599 Tutors

Massachusetts Institute of Technology



2319 Tutors

New York University





1645 Tutors

Notre Dam University





1911 Tutors

Oklahoma University





2122 Tutors

Pennsylvania State University





932 Tutors

Princeton University





1211 Tutors

Stanford University





983 Tutors

University of California





1282 Tutors

Oxford University





123 Tutors

Yale University





2325 Tutors