Case Summary and Reflection

User Generated

Pevgvpnyguvaxvat

Writing

Description

Summarize the attached case (No plagiarism)

It must be zero plagiarism

you must give your reaction, your opinion, and reflection.

you must add new idea to it by using new current information about the topic (references)

You must do some research.

two full pages without writing name or instructor.

font size 12

single space

time roman

MLA style and the references must be in all pages by using footnotes.

I have attached the case and example for the footnotes.

Unformatted Attachment Preview

“ARM 34 provided a formula for valuing a business: Capitalize the excess earnings to arrive at the value of intangible assets and then add that to the value of tangible assets.”1 Business valuation methods varied somewhat from the 1930’s through the 1950’s, but for the most part, generally followed this format. At the present time, there appears to be quite a bit of confusion regarding what standard of value should be used in marital dissolution cases. Valuation experts rely on the attorney who hires them to provide guidance on the applicable standard of value to use. The standards of value used in various states’ statutes, and the case law which interprets those standards differ from state to state. In many states, commonly accepted standards of value are defined as: Fair market value, Fair value, Investment value, and Intrinsic value. Given the present state of confusion surrounding what the correct standard to be used for divorce proceedings is, I have decided to focus on the difference between Fair market value and Strategic value.2 While it should be noted that a great deal of controversy surrounds the issue of Personal Goodwill under the standard of Fair market value (especially when valuing professional service entities), I will avoid this issue by illustrating a hypothetical divorce settlement appeal based on an actual matter where I was chosen as the valuation expert, and Personal Goodwill was not an issue. Fair market value as defined in Rev. Rul. 59-60 is: “… the price at which property would change hands between a willing buyer and a willing seller when the former is not under any compulsion to buy and the latter is not under any compulsion to sell, both parties having reasonable knowledge of relevant facts.” Section 20.2031-1(b) of the Estate Tax Regulations. “A strategic or synergistic value reflects added benefits to a particular acquirer because of synergies with the acquirer. That is, it is a price or potential price reflecting all or some portion of the value of synergistic benefits created through the combination of the respective entities for which a buyer might be willing to pay. Such benefits include, for example, increasing market share, reducing costs by combining operations, and/or raising prices by eliminating a competitor….Synergistic value generally reflects some added value above fair market value. Because it reflects the value of benefits available to a particular buyer, it is usually considered to fall within the concept of investment value…”3 Valuing Professional Practices and Licenses – A Guide for the Matrimonial Practitoner, 3rd edition, 2011-2 Supplement, Wolters Kluwer Law & Business, p. 8-3. 2 It should be noted that both standards of value are applied under the premise of value being, going concern - which assumes that the entity will continue to operate in its current form after the valuation date. A liquidation or break-up premise of value would assume that the entity would cease operations after the valuation date. 3 The Lawyer’s Business Valuation Handbook, Shannon Pratt, 2000, ©2000, The American Bar Association, p. 14. 1
Purchase answer to see full attachment
User generated content is uploaded by users for the purposes of learning and should be used following Studypool's honor code & terms of service.

Explanation & Answer

Whats up buddy?😀 I completed the essay and I used MLA style for formatting and referencing.😎 Everything should be clear but if you have any questions..hit me up and I will explain..😇 Also, if there is anything that you want added or ommitted from the document, let me know and I will be glad to do it.😀 Otherwise if the work is satisfactory, go ahead to complete and review the question below..👇

Surname 1
Student’s Name:
Instructor’s Name:
Course Title:
Date:
CASE SUMMARY AND REFLECTION
The case study analyzed is about a company called the Diamond Foods Inc., which
started as a walnut cooperative for the farmers. Later in the years after its founding, the
company changed from a cooperative to a public company that attracted many investors.
During the transition, Diamond Foods Inc. management changed from being governed by a
board of directors of the cooperative to being lead by a Chief Executive Officer of the
company. According to the case study reports, ever since Diamond Foods changed into a
publicly traded company, it has been posting significant profits on its financial statements.
However, there is a controversy revolving around Diamond Foods Inc. profit returns. For
instance, the walnut farmers in California have accused the company of underpaying them
since its cessation from being a cooperative. However, the company argues that the walnut
farmers ceased being the company's members and became the firm's suppliers (Gray p.4).
Also, the walnut farmers are bound by periodical contracts. The farmers sign contracts that
cover periods of three, five and ten-year terms that guarantee them a buyer and ready market
for their harvest. Therefore, to understand the controversy involving the Diamond Foods Inc.
and walnut farmers in California, Roberts decided to investigate the case.
Mark Roberts runs ‘Off Wall Street Consulting Group,' which is an investment
research company in Cambridge. Roberts' company has gained a positive reputation as one of
the most credible stock analysts, and Mark's recommendations are highly valued. Therefore,
Roberts' investigation into Diamond Foods Inc. and walnut farmers' case can be used to shed
some light on the issue, which will assist in determining the truth of the matter. In my
opinion, Roberts' Off Wall Street Consulting Group is a suitable company for investigating
the case. This is because the company is an independent institution that seeks to do a robust
analysis on investment research1. The firm outlined the underlying factors and defined the
problems present in the financial statements of Diamond Company. Although the company
may not have been one hundred percent (100%) sure of the predicaments that brought about
the disparity between Diamond Foods Inc. and the walnut farmers, it gave possible issues
present and recommended various solutions that were applicable.
From the case study, it is difficult to understand whether Diamond Foods Inc.
reported growth or not. Additionally, the issue of whether the same company was seeking to
move from a low-profit-margin to a high-profit-margin business via its shift to the snacks
industry remains unexplained. In my opinion, the Diamond Foods Inc. Company aimed at
running its business from low-profit margin to high-profit-margin business. Diamond
Company made the shift into the snacks sector from their core business which was walnuts.
The change came at a time when walnuts were losing their market share in the market and
being replaced and substituted by other forms of nuts such as hazels nuts. Although walnuts
were still the best selling nuts at the time, the market entry o...


Anonymous
I use Studypool every time I need help studying, and it never disappoints.

Studypool
4.7
Trustpilot
4.5
Sitejabber
4.4

Similar Content

Related Tags