Component Excellent Satisfactory General Test Information Student provides an accurate, thorough review of each General Testing Category. Critique demonstrates thorough knowledge of course concepts. Student provides accurate description of evidence for reliability and validity that reflects knowledge of course concepts. Student provides some review of each General Testing Category. At times description lacks coherence. Critique demonstrates some knowledge of course concepts. Student provides accurate description of test strengths and weaknesses that reflect knowledge of course concepts. Student provides description of test strengths and weaknesses that are mostly accurate and reflect some course concepts. At times description lacks coherence. Student provides accurate description of multicultural application that reflects knowledge of course concepts. Student provides description of multicultural application that is mostly accurate and reflects some course concepts. At times description lacks coherence. Student integrates greater than three scholarly Student integrates two to three scholarly 50 Points Possible (25 Points Per Test) Technical Evaluation 50 Points Possible (25 Points Per Test) Test Critique 50 Points Possible (25 Points Per Test) Multicultural Application 40 Points Possible (20 Points Per Test) Critical Analysis 40 Points Possible (20 Points Per Test) Student provides description of evidence for reliability and validity that are mostly accurate and reflect some course concepts. At times description lacks coherence. Needs Improvement Student provides a marginal review of each General Testing Category. Inaccuracies are present. Sufficient details and supporting evidence are lacking. Critique demonstrates marginal knowledge of course concepts. Student provides marginally accurate description of evidence for reliability and validity. Description does not integrate course concepts. Sufficient details and supporting evidence are lacking. Student provides marginally accurate description of test strengths and weaknesses. Description does not integrate course concepts. Sufficient details and supporting evidence are lacking. Student provides marginally accurate description of multicultural application. Description does not integrate course concepts. Sufficient details and supporting evidence are lacking. Student integrates less than two scholarly resources to support ideas. Unsatisfactory Student does not provide review of each General Testing Category. Critique does not demonstrate knowledge of course concepts. Student does not provide description of evidence for reliability and validity. Student does not provide description of test strengths and weaknesses. Student does not provide description of multicultural application. Student does not integrate scholarly Points Earned Formatting/Writing 50 Points Possible (25 Points Per Test) Summary Comments: references to support ideas. references to support ideas. Work is presented in a logical and coherent way. Writing is clear, articulate, and error free. Citations are composed in proper format with few or no errors. Work is grammatically sound with a few minor errors. Citations are composed in the proper format with some errors. resources to support ideas. Work contains frequent grammatical errors. Citations are inaccurate or improperly formatted. Work does not demonstrate appropriate graduate level writing. Total Points: General Test Information Name of Test Publisher and Publication Date Test Description (30 word minimum) Construct(s), domain(s) or variable(s) the test measures (30 word minimum) Theoretical Foundation of Test (50 word minimum) Purpose and potential uses of test (50 word minimum) Whom the test is designed for (30 word minimum) Number of items Item Format (such as multiple choice, true or false) Subscales (50 word minimum) Test Administration Procedures (50 word minimum) Administrator Qualifications (such as degree, experience) Assignment adapted from Nicolai, K. (2005). Student Workbook for Psychological Testing: Principles, Applications and Issues. Thomson/Wadsworth, ISBN 0-534-63308-0. Type of Test Scoring (manual or computer) Subscale, Factor or Dimension Scores (if applicable) Technical Evaluation Evidence of reliability (such as test-retest, internal consistency) (100 word minimum) Evidence of validity (such as content, criterion, construct related) (100 word minimum) Critique Test Strengths (200 word minimum) Test Weaknesses (200 word minimum) Multicultural Application Analysis of the multicultural application of the test (addressing research on multicultural comparison OR limitations of generalizability based on lack of multicultural data) (250 word minimum) Assignment adapted from Nicolai, K. (2005). Student Workbook for Psychological Testing: Principles, Applications and Issues. Thomson/Wadsworth, ISBN 0-534-63308-0. Assignment adapted from Nicolai, K. (2005). Student Workbook for Psychological Testing: Principles, Applications and Issues. Thomson/Wadsworth, ISBN 0-534-63308-0.
Purchase answer to see full attachment