xamine the scenario through a lens of cultural competence to determine when/how a deeper cultural understanding would have influenced the teacher’s responses.

Anonymous

Question Description

In a 500-750 word analysis, discuss 2-3 of the following concepts of deep culture in the context of the selected case study:

  • Collective orientation (promoting needs of the group versus promoting needs of the individual)
  • Time orientation
  • Respect for authority
  • Perceptions and value of education
  • Priority of family
  • Communication (e.g., language development, verbal communication styles, nonverbal communication, physical proximity)
  • Value of work/Work ethic
  • Peer pressure
  • Assimilation dilemma: adaptation versus preservation

In addition, include specific advice to the teacher in your case study to help him or her respond more appropriately to the student/family.

Use at least 2-3 scholarly sources (other than the assigned readings) to justify your responses.

Unformatted Attachment Preview

CASE STUDY: Case Study Jorge Vargas is a sixth grade Mexican-American student who has a diagnosed learning disability. His parents have been invited to attend his annual IEP conference. The teacher, Ms. Franklin, waits expectantly for them in the conference room and has set up three chairs, one for herself, and two for the parents. When the parents do arrive ten minutes after the scheduled appointment time, three other people are with them, a grandmother, an aunt, and an infant. In exasperation, the teacher attempts to find some additional chairs. Mr. and Mrs. Vargas are Mexican migrant farmers who have had to reschedule this conference on at least two other occasions. When they do arrive, it becomes apparent to the teacher that the parents do not speak English fluently. Ms. Franklin is at a loss in terms of strategies for communication but continues by explaining Jorge’s progress and goals for the coming school year. She uses a lot of technical jargon to describe and explain Jorge’s academic objectives. She does pause to ask if the parents have any questions, but they stare at her blankly and then smile. In an effort to communicate more effectively, Ms. Franklin talks extremely loud and in a slow cadence. This behavior puzzles the family members. Training Activity 3.7 150 Ms. Franklin addresses a concern she has about Jorge’s attendance. Last month he was absent for an entire week without notifying the school. And this month he has already missed three days of school. The parents confirm that he was absent on the occasions cited. At the conclusion of the conference, the parents sign the necessary paper work, the teacher thanks them for coming, and the family shakes her hand and leaves. Facilitator’s Notes 1. Because of the proximity between the United States and many parts of Central and South America, a considerable number of Latino immigrants find themselves returning to their countries of origin for regular visits. The collective orientation among many traditionally oriented Latino families may mean that family obligations take precedence over a child’s education. The seasonal nature of migrant farming may result in frequent moves among Latino children. Educators may work to secure services from local homeless education agencies to assist in meeting the educational needs of transitory children. 2. Acculturative stress refers to the challenges that immigrants experience as a result of attempting to adapt to a new cultural milieu. These stressors often include high unemployment and poverty rates, health factors, difficulty securing assistance from schools and agencies, language barriers, culture shock, a sense of grief and loss of the homeland, etc. School-age children may often be called upon to assist with the family transition process by serving as interpreters and negotiating bureaucratic agencies, which frequently occurs during school times and results in high rates of absenteeism. What systemic resources can schools rely on to insure that children spend more time in school? 3. Many Latino parents experience difficulty negotiating American educational institutions and, consequently, avoid contact with school officials for fear they will embarrass themselves or their children. These families often regard education as the school’s domain and feel their responsibility involves addressing issues of behavior. The educational preparation and exposure that governs the parenting styles of many middle class American families may not be understood or even function as a priority given other pressing needs for survival. Moreover, many immigrant Latinos may reside in this country illegally and harbor apprehensions that they may be deported if school officials uncover this information. Such fears may reduce interactions between the school and the family. BACKGROUND INFO: Nomenclature. The term Hispanic refers to people whose ancestry stems from a Spanishspeaking country. Historically, this term has embodied the legacy of Spanish colonial rule and therefore includes European immigrants from Spain. As a result of the complex history of Latin America, Hispanics comprise several different racial groups that include people of European, African, and Indian ancestry. For this reason, Hispanic people more closely approximate criteria established for an ethnicity versus an actual racial group. The U.S. government originally imposed the term Hispanic as a means of classifying people and dispersing federal resources. Many individuals regard the term Hispanic as woefully inadequate because it obscures the distinctive political, social, personal, historical, and language identities of people throughout Central and South America, as well as the Spanish-speaking Caribbean (Stavans, 1995). For example, the term may not be adequate because people from Brazil have Portuguese heritage and speak Portuguese as opposed to Spanish. In a qualitative analysis of how the Hispanic label impacts people, Oboler (1995) found that many study participants felt the term Hispanic homogenized people and several respondents attributed more salience to their nationality than to a classification system based loosely on language and geographic origin. In fact, one informant disclosed that she did not realize she was Hispanic until she immigrated to the United States. For the purpose of this document, the term Latino will be used unless authors whose works are cited use other terminology. Demographics. In 1990, 9% of the U.S. population consisted of Latinos. Within a tenyear period, the Latino population increased by 57.9% to account for 12.5% of the U.S. population (U.S. Census Bureau, 2000c). For the first time in history, Latinos have now surpassed African Americans as the largest minority group in this country. Increases in the Latino population have been attributed in large measure to changes in U.S. immigration patterns and to birth rates (Driscoll, Biggs, Brindis, & Yankah, 2001). Currently, immigrants from Latin America and Asia tend to have the highest birth rates. Latinos in this country represent a very heterogeneous group whose origins stem from at least 20 countries. Although most Latinos are united by Spanish language, this factor can be misleading. For example, as mentioned, Brazilians speak Portuguese. Further, among Latinos definite language differences exist in the amount of Spanish spoken, and there is the tendency among some Latinos to combine both languages and speak Spanglish, as well as varying dialects that exist throughout Spanishspeaking countries (Robinson & HowardHamilton, 2000). There is a great deal of geographic diversity in this population as well. According to the U.S. Census Bureau (2000c), 66% of Latinos residing in this country are Mexican, 14.5% hail from Central and South America, 9% are Puerto Rican, 4% have Cuban origins, and 6.4% are of other Latino backgrounds. Although we live in the most developed country in the world, poverty remains a pervasive social issue that severely jeopardizes the health, educational outcomes, and economic well-being of children and families. In 1989, 32.2% of Latino children lived in poverty. Currently, the fact that 40.3% of Latino children live in poverty serves as a source of growing concern (Children’s Defense Fund, 1998). Children who experience poverty are 2.8 times more likely to have had inadequate prenatal care, two times more likely to repeat a grade, 3.4 times more likely to get expelled, and only half as likely to earn a bachelor’s degree. If education is the great equalizer, then educational opportunities must improve for children from minority groups. In a national profile comparing the percentage of public school teachers to student enrollment, the National Center for Education Statistics (1995) reported that in the 1993-94 school year 4.1% of teachers and 11.5% of students were Latino. Although it is not necessary for students and teachers to share the same heritage in order for successful learning outcomes to occur, students do benefit when teachers understand and incorporate cultural elements into their teaching repertoire (Delpit, 1995). According to Education Watch (1998), Latinos accounted for 13.5% of public school enrollment nationwide, yet only 6.3% of the gifted population. School-age Latino children represented 11.6% of students receiving special education services and 13.1% of all school suspensions. A somewhat different picture emerges at the state level. Latinos accounted for 3.2% of school-age children in Virginia, 1.6% of students identified as gifted and talented, 3.3% of students receiving special education, and 3.0% of all suspensions (Education Trust, 1998). Latinos accounted for 34.7% of high school dropout rates (National Center for Education Statistics, 1995). The large majority of Hispanic students who drop out of school do so before the tenth-grade (Nicolau & Ramos, 1990). Dropout rates for this population often provide misleading information, however. For instance, when examining dropout rates for U.S.-born Latinos, as opposed to all Latinos in the United States, the dropout rate hovers around 20% (Government Accounting Office, 1994). The fact that many immigrant Latinos have lower rates of educational attainment can be accounted for by examining their purpose in coming to the United States. That is, a vast number of immigrants seek employment as a priority over education and consequently do not enroll in or complete school (Driscoll et al., 2001). Many of these immigrants work as migrants in low-paying service occupations and their income often supports families residing both in the United States and in their countries of origin. Social and educational issues. Because Latinos have their origins in several different countries throughout Latin America, they do not necessarily share universal social, historical, or cultural backgrounds. Each group has had a varied and unique experience in this country, which includes their reasons for migration, relationship to this country, and their social and educational experiences. For instance, Mexicans have a longstanding history with the United States. In fact, portions of the Southwestern United States originally belonged to Mexico prior to the MexicanAmerican War. In the 1848 Treaty of Guadalupe Hidalgo following the war, Mexico ceded California, Nevada, Arizona, Utah, and parts of New Mexico and Colorado to the United States (Samora & Simon, 1993). This treaty guaranteed U.S. citizenship to Mexican inhabitants. More recently, many Mexicans have fled their homeland to seek employment opportunities in this country. Among other Latino groups, Cubans arrived on the shores of the United State largely due to Fidel Castro’s overthrow of the Cuban government and installation of a communist regime in 1959. Puerto Rico is a commonwealth of the United States, so its citizens automatically have U.S. citizenship. Civil war, political strife, and poverty are among the reasons why many people from Central and South America chose to emigrate from their homelands. Despite their varied histories and compelling reasons for entering this country, many, if not most, immigrant Latinos have, at some point, had to cope with the burden of language acquisition in a country that shuns individuals who do not speak English fluently. The Supreme Court and a host of researchers have addressed the issues surrounding bilingualism. In 1974 the Supreme Court ruled in Lau v. Nichols that all non-English speaking students were entitled to a meaningful education. This mandate resulted in the proliferation of bilingual education programs throughout the country. Oddly enough, the concept of bilingual education has been shrouded in controversy since its inception, particularly because there is a tendency to equate English proficiency with patriotism. To complicate matters, many people have mistaken notions of even the definition of bilingual education. Bilingual programs involve children receiving instruction in their native tongues for at least a portion of the day with the intent that they transition into English-speaking classes within two to three years (Nieto, 1996). As an advantage, bilingual programs permit students to remain abreast of the curriculum through instruction in their native language while simultaneously learning English. The success of bilingual education programs can be attributed to the fact that students’ native tongue is used as a bridge for learning English. Other approaches to second-language acquisition include English-as-a-second-language (ESL). Typically, ESL programs provide non-native English-speaking students with language skills so they can function adequately in an English language class. ESL teachers are not necessarily proficient in the students’ native language because ESL programs are predicated on the fact that students will learn the rudiments of English. ESL approaches to learning are particularly useful for students from low-incidence groups in which there are not enough speakers of a particular language to warrant a bilingual program. Many Asian languages fall into the low-incidence category. Unfortunately, students have the potential to flounder in ESL programs because they do not receive instruction in the content areas while learning English. Proposition 227 resulted in the elimination of bilingual education programs in the state of California. As it stands now, students for whom English is a second language receive one year of transition services followed by placement into an English immersion program (Sue & Sue, 1999). In 2000, Arizona voters enacted a similar initiative banning bilingual education. Washington state provides transition services that permit students to receive bilingual services for three years before shifting them to all-English classes. The controversy surrounding English acquisition has placed stumbling blocks in the path of language-minority students who routinely confront: x Discrimination x Negative perceptions about their ability x Low expectations from educators for achievement x Inadequate funding for instructional programs x Resentment and opposition from those who wield power in educational and political arenas In an ethnographic study of 97 classrooms spanning a period of six years, Ortiz (1988) compared the educational experiences of Hispanic and non Hispanic children. Some very disturbing findings emerged regarding the instructional quality provided for these two cultural groups. For example, teacher informants in the study openly acknowledged individual acts of both covert and overt racism. Individual teacher behaviors that could be described as discriminatory included a pattern of low expectations, deprecating remarks about Hispanic students’ background and language proficiency, and instances in which exemplary student performances were questioned or attributed to some anomaly. Other examples included the fact that when supply shortages occurred, Latino students did not receive materials or were asked to share supplies with other Latino students. When questioned about these practices, teachers responded that Latino students tend to be more cooperative than other students and do not mind. Ortiz also noted that teachers frequently avoided eye contact and close interactions with these students, praised mediocre performances, and expressed exasperation when students did not respond directly to questions. Surprisingly, teachers, who volunteered for interviews and whose classes were observed, obtained high profiles on three separate attitudinal measures that assessed sensitivity towards cultural difference. In Ortiz’s study, teacher attitudes and behaviors seemed to be reinforced by institutional practices. Within several schools regular education teachers regarded bilingual teachers with contempt and hostility. Ortiz even documented a disturbing incident in which regular education teachers requested not to eat lunch with bilingual teachers for fear that they would converse in Spanish among themselves. Worse yet, building-level administrators honored these requests. This example suggests that buildinglevel administrators who are expected to remain impartial out of a sense of ethical responsibility opted instead to reinforce and condone intolerance and bigotry. Ortiz also documented policies and decisions that reinforced a system of bias on the basis of culture and race. In this study, bilingual classes were often situated in remote areas of the building and instructional supplies tended to be scant. Frequently, teachers in bilingual classrooms were younger and more inexperienced. It was not uncommon for teachers without any formal training in bilingual education to serve bilingual students. Moreover, bilingual education curriculum was not aligned with the regular education curriculum, although students were expected to perform according to national performance standards. These factors emanate from and persist within larger social structures that point to the complicity and interaction of individuals, institutions, and societies in maintaining systems of inequality for students from devalued cultural groups. Uncontested, such practices contribute to the continued subordination of minority groups through the perpetuation of social and economic stratification, and injustice (Patton, 1998). This study does not reflect a single perspective. In fact, similar findings have been documented elsewhere (Darder, 1995; Hilliard, 1992). Nicolau and Ramos (1990) noted that many Latino parents are not aware of strategies for promoting academic achievement and success. To complicate matters, Latino parents and school personnel are often estranged from one another and do not know the other’s expectations. Many immigrant Latino parents are frequently more attuned to the importance of developing social skills in their children than academics. Further, the U.S. educational system differs markedly from school systems in their homelands. In their native countries, the school and families performed very different and distinct roles. For instance, the school assumes responsibility for providing learning resources and parents prepare students to behave appropriately by instilling social competencies in their children. Social competence may include behaviors such as deference to teachers, silence, and cooperation. In an educational system where verbal fluency is highly regarded, this strategy is not very appropriate. In a study of extreme and acquiescent response styles among Latinos, Marin, Gamba, and Marin (1992) found that less acculturated and less welleducated Latinos tended to provide responses that agreed with the examiner. As acculturation levels increased, the tendency to acquiesce decreased. The researchers suggested that an acquiescent response set may be related in part to cultural values such as simpatia, or an emphasis on the collective. In addition, extreme and acquiescent response styles may be consistent with power differentials that exist between individuals in a dominant and subordinate role and shape the level and depth of social interactions. Altarriba and Bauer (1998) noted that, because of the proximity between the United States and Latin America, many Latinos retain their language and values. Low-income Latino children frequently suffer delayed language development (Nicolau and Ramos, 1990). Curiously, immigrant children are often discouraged from speaking Spanish in school, which has complex consequences on their ability to develop a healthy bicultural identity (Darder, 1995; Espin, 1987; Ortiz, 1988). More specifically, the devaluation of Spanish language contributes to cultural subordination and has negative consequences on the ability to develop a healthy ethnic identity. Frequently, immigrant groups, who are expected to conform to dominant cultural values, are regarded as outsiders and viewed as intruders in mainstream American society ...
Purchase answer to see full attachment

Tutor Answer

Profjohnkimz
School: University of Virginia

Attached.

Last name 1
Name
Course
Date
Priority of Family
From history, the Hispanics often have a priority of their families. They view the needs of
the family as more important than the needs of an individual as well as the needs of one’s selfesteem. The welfare of a family is more important than the welfare of an individual member of
the family. This culture is still alive even among the Hispanics who are living in the United
States. It has been noted that the Hispanics living the United States and are form the Latino
nations of Central and South America have the trait of family support ingrained in their lifestyle
(Wildsmith et al, 2014).
The Latinos value their family obligations as they believe that is the basic source of their
livelihood. This tradition of prioritizing family obligations affected other aspects of the life of
most Latinos, especially children (Wildsmith et al, 2014). For instance, when a need arises like
negot...

flag Report DMCA
Review

Anonymous
Thanks, good work

Brown University





1271 Tutors

California Institute of Technology




2131 Tutors

Carnegie Mellon University




982 Tutors

Columbia University





1256 Tutors

Dartmouth University





2113 Tutors

Emory University





2279 Tutors

Harvard University





599 Tutors

Massachusetts Institute of Technology



2319 Tutors

New York University





1645 Tutors

Notre Dam University





1911 Tutors

Oklahoma University





2122 Tutors

Pennsylvania State University





932 Tutors

Princeton University





1211 Tutors

Stanford University





983 Tutors

University of California





1282 Tutors

Oxford University





123 Tutors

Yale University





2325 Tutors