You are required to complete both parts A and B. Part A:Complete Lab 2-2 Use PivotTables to Denormalize and Analyze the Data (pp. 60 – 67) in your textbook. Download Data Files Here (Links to an external site.).Part B:Your analysis should be written as an essay and should include the following:IntroductionAnalysisHeadings - Part 1, Part 2, Part 3, Part 4, and Part 5 (i.e., Part 1: Identify the Questions) – headings are shown in the Lab.Part 4 – Answer Question 6 onlyPart 5 – Answer Question 8 onlyConclusion.Submit your analysis as a Word document and submit any additional requirements noted in the Lab (i.e., Excel files, tables, etc.).Your paper should be 3-4 pages in length, not including required cover and references pages or other files and tables, and conform to the guidelines found in the CSU Global Writing Center (Links to an external site.). Include at least two scholarly references in addition to the course textbook. The CSU Global Library (Links to an external site.) is a good place to find these references

Ediscovery assignment 3Legal Field: Civil Litigation Focus Area: Boilerplate Discovery Objections CASE: Wesley Corp. v. Zoom T.V. Prods., LLC, No. 17-10021, 2018 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 5068 (E.D. Mich. Jan. 11, 2018). FACTS: In Wesley Corp, Plaintiff sought, among other things, a Motion to Compel Defendants’ responses to Plaintiff’s discovery. Plaintiff argued that Defendants’ use of boilerplate objections in the returned discovery requests were improper and constituted obstructionist behavior. Plaintiff asked the court to compel Defendants to provide proper responses to Plaintiff’s previously submitted interrogatories and requests for production. The court denied Plaintiff’s motions without prejudice and gave Defendants a second chance to adjust their responses. The court also warned both parties that additional intervention by the court in this discovery dispute would likely result in significant sanctions. INSTRUCTIONS: Beginning with Wesley and using available reference and case materials found on Lexis or in other sources, discuss: Why courts, in general, have such a strong distaste for boilerplate objections;What Federal Rules of Civil Procedure apply to boilerplate objections; andUnder what circumstances might a party find themselves sanctioned by the court for their ue of boilerplate objections in discovery responses. EXPLAIN FULLY.