THE ETHICAL RELATIVISM OF
ANCIENT SOPHISM AND
COMPARING AND CONTRASTING BETWEEN THE TWO
According to Rorty Ethical Relativism is the view that every
belief on a certain topic or concerning any topic is as good as
every other topic. When the two are compared and contrasted
then the connection between the two can be narrowed down to
the fact of truth. They both have similar in describing the truth
and what it means.
This is the concept that shows that different points of view
have no absolute truth in ethical or validity. These points of
view mainly have relative, subjective value according to
differences in perception and consideration. According to
Rorty Relativists may infer that there is no such things as truth
since there are no external objective standards that are valid
In addition ethical relativist may use the word truth but in real
sense what is true to some may not be true to the other. It might
determine its path and direction according to the ruling preference
of the individual and acts but not mostly in humble way.
considering the ethical relativist and bearing in mind that it doesn’t
submit to an objective external truth then it might be concluded
that the decision of one is always the best.
DIFFERENCE OF ETHICAL
There are different categories under which these ethical
relativism fall under which they include true and false, right and
wrong and are mainly used to expressing ones opinion or agreed
upon community values. This contribute mostly to relativist doing
what she or...
15 Million Students Helped!
Sign up to view the full answer