**APA format, keep away from from the word "normal", use a lot of details to describe patient**You will perform a history of a neurologic problem that your instructor has provided you or one that you have experienced and perform an assessment of the neurologic system. You will document your subjective and objective findings, note any abnormal findings, and submit this in a Word document to the drop box provided.Title:Documentation of problem based assessment of the neurological system.Purpose of Assignment: Learning the required components of documenting a problem based subjective and objective assessment of neurological system. Identify abnormal findings.Course Competency:Apply assessment techniques for the neurological and respiratory systems.Instructions:Content:Use of three sections: Subjective, Objective, and Abnormal FindingsShort descriptive paragraph of findings for each sectionFormat:Standard American English (correct grammar, punctuation, etc.)Documentation Grading Rubric- 10 possible points Levels of Achievement Criteria Emerging Competence Proficiency Mastery Subjective (4 Pts) Missing components such as biographic data, medications, or allergies. Symptoms analysis is incomplete. May contain objective data. Basic biographic data provided. Medications and allergies included. Symptoms analysis incomplete. Lacking detail. No objective data. Basic biographic data provided. Included list of medications and allergies. Symptoms analysis: PQRSTU completed. Lacking detail. No objective data. Information is solely what “client” provided. Basic biographic data provided. Included list of medications and allergies. Symptoms analysis: PQRSTU completed. Detailed. No objective data. Information is solely what “client” provided. Points: 0.5 Points:1 Points: 2 Points:4 Objective (4 Pts) Missing components of assessment for particular system. May contain subjective data. May have signs of bias or explanation of findings. May have included words such as “normal”, “appropriate”, “okay”, and “good”. Includes all components of assessment for particular system. Lacks detail. Uses words such as “normal”, “appropriate”, or “good”.Contains all objective information. May have signs of bias or explanation of findings. Includes all components of assessment for particular system. Avoided use of words such as “normal”, “appropriate”, or “good”.No bias or explanation for findings evident Contains all objective information Includes all components of assessment for particular system. Detailed information provided.Avoided use of words such as “normal”, “appropriate”, or “good”.No bias or explanation for findings evident. All objective information Points: 1 Points: 2 Points: 3 Points: 4 Strength and Weakness (2 Pts) Lists one strength and one weakness with no description or reason for selection of them. Failure to provide both one strength and weakness will result in zero points for this criteria. Provides brief description of one strength and one weakness with no reason for identification of the strength and weakness. Provides description of one strength and one weakness noted on assessment. Gives reason for identification of the strength and weakness. Detailed description of one strength and one weakness noted during assessment. Detailed reason provided for identifying the strength and weakness. Points: 0.5 Points: 1 Points: 1.5 Points: 2

Think about someone you have had difficulty working with. Consider this person's personality based upon the True Colors descriptors.Without going into personally identifying details, describe a scenario or two to demonstrate your difficulties. How might your situation have changed or improved if you could have considered the personality differences you've learned about? How might this information have changed your approach to working with the person you identified?Attach a copy of your True Colors reportInitial post: 300References required: 2 (1 from the learning activities, 1 not included in the course)

Can you help me understand this Statistics question?Hi, I need help creating this memo. After several horrible drafts.