Business Finance
BBA2551 Columbia Southern Japan Clashes in Culture and Expectations Analysis

BBA2551

Columbia Southern University

Question Description

Write a two- to three-page analysis using the Case Study on pages 295-297 in your textbook, “Kelly’s Assignment in Japan.” BBA 2551, Intercultural Management 3 Your analysis should address the following questions: 1. Explain the clashes in culture, customs, and expectations that occurred in this situation. 2. What stage of culture shock is Kelly’s family experiencing? 3. Turn back the clock to when Kelly was offered the position in Tokyo. What, if anything, should have been done differently, and by whom? 4. You are Kelly. What should you do now? Your case study analysis should follow APA guidelines for formatting of all resources, both in-text and as references. Your analysis should include a title page and should include a separate reference page.

BBA2551 Columbia Southern Japan Clashes in Culture and Expectations Analysis
pg1.jpg
BBA2551 Columbia Southern Japan Clashes in Culture and Expectations Analysis
pg_2.jpg
BBA2551 Columbia Southern Japan Clashes in Culture and Expectations Analysis
pg_3.jpg

Unformatted Attachment Preview

Rubric Detail A rubric lists grading criteria that instructors use to evaluate student work. Your instructor linked a rubric to this item and made it available to you. Select Grid View or List View to change the rubric's layout. Content Name: GradingRubricforCaseStudy Grid View List View Level 1 Unsatisfactory Level 2 - Needs Improvement Level 3 Satisfactory Level 4 - Good Level 5 Excellent Points Range: 0 (0%) - 23 (23%) Points Range: 24 (24%) - 27 (27%) Points Range: 28 (28%) - 31 (31%) Points Range: 32 (32%) - 35 (35%) Points Range: 36 (36%) - 40 (40%) Presents an account Presents an account that is Presents an analysis Presents a thorough Presents an insightful and Analysis Level 1 Unsatisfactory Level 2 - Needs Improvement Level 3 Satisfactory containing little analysis or relevant argument; interpretation is not well supported. Course concepts and analytical tools are not applied appropriately. Feedback: descriptive but contains little analysis or relevant arguments; interpretation is not well supported. Course concepts and analytical tools are not applied appropriately. Feedback: containing relevant arguments; interpretation is not thoroughly supported and not compelling. Course concepts and analytical tools are sometimes applied appropriately. Feedback: analysis with effective arguments; interpretation is both reasonable and compelling. Course concepts and analytical tools are often applied appropriately. Feedback: thorough analysis with strong arguments and evidence; interpretation is both reasonable and compelling. Course concepts and analytical tools are always appropriately applied. Feedback: Points Range: 0 (0%) - 23 (23%) Points Range: 24 (24%) - 27 (27%) Points Range: 28 (28%) - 31 (31%) Points Range: 32 (32%) - 35 (35%) Points Range: 36 (36%) - 40 (40%) Demonstrates lack of or incomplete application of research Demonstrates limited application of relevant research Demonstrates application of fairly adequate research findings and/or Demonstrates good application of relevant research Demonstrates excellent application of relevant and compelling Level 4 - Good Level 5 Excellent Research Level 1 Unsatisfactory Level 2 - Needs Improvement findings and/or course content. Feedback: findings and/or course content. Feedback: Points Range: 0 (0%) - 5 (5%) Writing Mechanics Writing lacks clarity and conciseness. Serious problems with sentence structure and grammar. Numerous major and/or minor errors in punctuation and spelling. Feedback: Points Range: 6 (6%) - 6 (6%) Writing lacks clarity and/or conciseness. Contains minor problems with sentence structure and some grammatical errors as well as several minor errors in punctuation and spelling. Feedback: Level 3 Satisfactory course content. Feedback: Points Range: 7 (7%) - 7 (7%) Writing is mostly clear and concise. Sentence structure and grammar are strong and mostly correct. There may be 3 or 4 minor errors in punctuation and/or spelling Feedback: Level 4 - Good findings and/or course content. Feedback: Points Range: 8 (8%) - 8 (8%) Writing is clear and concise. Sentence structure and grammar are strong. There may be 1-2 minor punctuation errors and/or spelling errors. Feedback: Level 5 Excellent research findings and/or course content. Feedback: Points Range: 9 (9%) - 10 (10%) Writing is clear and concise. Sentence structure and grammar are excellent. Correct use of punctuation. No spelling errors. Feedback: Level 1 Unsatisfactory Points Range: 0 (0%) - 5 (5%) APA Guidelines Shows evidence of little to no use of APA format. Feedback: Name:GradingRubricforCaseStudy Level 2 - Needs Improvement Points Range: 6 (6%) - 6 (6%) Reflects incomplete knowledge of APA format. Source documentation may contain major errors. Feedback: Level 3 Satisfactory Level 4 - Good Level 5 Excellent Points Range: 7 (7%) - 7 (7%) Points Range: 8 (8%) - 8 (8%) Points Range: 9 (9%) - 10 (10%) Documents sources using APA format with several minor errors. Feedback: Documents sources using APA format with a few minor errors. Feedback: Documents sources using APA format accurately and consistently. Feedback: ...
Purchase answer to see full attachment

Final Answer

Hello, review the attached document and contact ...

EinsteintheProf (21994)
University of Maryland

Anonymous
I was on a very tight deadline but thanks to Studypool I was able to deliver my assignment on time.

Anonymous
The tutor was pretty knowledgeable, efficient and polite. Great service!

Anonymous
I did not know how to approach this question, Studypool helped me a lot.

Studypool
4.7
Trustpilot
4.5
Sitejabber
4.4
Similar Questions
Related Tags

Brown University





1271 Tutors

California Institute of Technology




2131 Tutors

Carnegie Mellon University




982 Tutors

Columbia University





1256 Tutors

Dartmouth University





2113 Tutors

Emory University





2279 Tutors

Harvard University





599 Tutors

Massachusetts Institute of Technology



2319 Tutors

New York University





1645 Tutors

Notre Dam University





1911 Tutors

Oklahoma University





2122 Tutors

Pennsylvania State University





932 Tutors

Princeton University





1211 Tutors

Stanford University





983 Tutors

University of California





1282 Tutors

Oxford University





123 Tutors

Yale University





2325 Tutors