Module B Response Paper  In Module A, you saw how a historian uses a primary source (Columbus's journal) to create an historical narrative. Now, let's back up a bit and take a close look at primary sources. In this process, we will construct the context of the source. First, some definitions: In the study of history as an academic discipline, a primary source (also called an original source or evidence) is an artifact, document, diary, manuscript, autobiography, recording, or any other source of information that was created at the time under study. It serves as an original source of information about the topic (Wikipedia). Primary sources are distinguished from secondary sources, which cite, comment on, or build upon primary sources. So far, you have been interpreting the source, rather than reading a secondary source by someone who has already done the interpretation for you. The other important definition here is context: the circumstances that form the historical setting for an event, statement, idea, or source and the terms in which it can be fully understood and assessed (Google). Students most often do not develop the context of the source in their papers. For example, many of you have received feedback from me indicating that you need an introduction that lays out the context of the source you're commenting on. For this Module, you will choose a source from the list below and: 1) simply report on the primary source by using the source to answer the questions below. In your Response Paper, you can just list the questions as they are here and answer them in full sentences. For some of the sources, the answers will be, in part, in Foner's introduction to the source. a. What type of source is it [an interview, a diary entry, a painting, music, a public record (court document, census document, political document, treaty, etc.)]? b. When was the source published or produced? c. Motive: --Who created the source and why? --Who is the author and what is her or his place in society (explain why you are justified in thinking so)? --Why do you think she or he wrote it? What evidence in the text tells you this? --Who might be the intended audience? What evidence in the text tells you this? --Does the author have a thesis or main point? What -- in one sentence -- is that thesis? 2) Next, you will include a paragraph that discusses the context of the source. As I've noted above, context is the circumstances that form the historical setting for an event, statement, idea, or source and the terms in which it can be fully understood and assessed. This can be found in the source itself, in the introduction to the source, and in Give Me Liberty!. For example, if you were using "Olaudah Equiano on Slavery (1789)", you would use Chapter 4 in Give Me Liberty! to discuss the Triangle Trade because that's the context (the historical setting, backdrop, circumstances, etc.) in which Equiano's narrative was written). As with other Response Papers, this should be between 250-350 words. The Pueblo Revolt (1680) or Adam Smith, The Results of Colonization (1776) or Nathaniel Bacon on Bacon’s Rebellion (1676) or Memorial against Non-English Immigration (1727) or Olaudah Equiano on Slavery (1789) or Advertisements for Runaway Slaves and Servants (1738) or The Trial of John Peter Zenger (1735) or The Great Awakening Comes to Connecticut (1740)  Module C Response Paper QuestionsUse the textbook Voices of Freedom and answer one of the questions at the end of ONE of the following documents:New York Workingmen Demand a Voice in the Revolutionary Struggle (1770)orAssociation of the New York Sons of Liberty (1773)orThomas Paine, Common Sense (1776)orJefferson’s Bill for Establishing Religious Freedom (1779)orThe Right of “Free Suffrage” (1776)orNoah Webster on Equality (1787)orPetition of Slaves to the Massachusetts Legislature (1777)orBenjamin Rush, Thoughts Upon Female Education (1787)Students whose papers answer the question and incorporate information from Give Me Liberty! will experience the most success.This is the link to GIVE ME LIBERTY which i will need you to use too to earn me more points. https://drive.google.com/file/d/1yvjLGdUFqJuw_vW2m...    Remember to copy the question you will be answering and also MLA format. 

InstructionsFor this assignment, you will review an animated film or movie of your choice. It can be a stop motion, 2D, or a 3D animated film. Maybe there is an animation that you enjoyed as a child that you would like to revisit with a critical eye. After watching the animation, please answer the following questions in complete sentences, using the Unit VIII Animation Review Worksheet.Include the animation title, year produced, and medium (stop motion, hand drawn, 3D, etc).Provide your star rating out of five stars with five stars being the highest and one star being the lowest. What genre or type of animation is it? Does it have a message?What is the animation’s plot? Does the plot make sense? Is it easy to follow or believable?Who are the main characters, and what are they like? Are the characters well written?How is the quality of the animation? Are there special effects? If so what are they like? Are there beautiful scenes? Are there moments where scenes are animated in an interesting way?Did you enjoy the animation? Why, or why not? Where were its good and bad points?What scene or part of the animation did you particularly enjoy or remember? Why was it good or memorable?Who would you recommend this animation to? Why?To what other animations you can compare this?Your response must be at least two pages in length. APA Style will not be required for this assignment.

Click on this link to access the online version of the Discovery Wheel (Links to an external site.).Click on "Start Here." You must have Adobe Flash Software. Answer questions. Complete the Discovery Wheel Exercise . at the end answer the (5 questions) . answers should be about 3-4 sentences for each question, except #4 where you can list your improvement areas. Copy and paste your answers into a Word Doc.