Business Finance
Individual Project 2

Colorado Technical University

Question Description

You are an assistant professor with the Department of Homeland Security, currently teaching undergraduate students. You gave a lecture on the U.S. Constitution, homeland security policies, laws and strategies, and their implementation at the national, state, and local levels. Your lecture was quite detailed and long, and many of the students have contacted you with follow-up questions.

You have decided that because of the number of questions and the nature of the questions you received, it would be best if you put out a short paper that went into detail about the topic. Apparently, most of the students who attended the lecture did not take notes.

Assignment Guidelines

  • Utilizing a U.S. Supreme Court case as a starting point, prepare a memo of 750–1,000 words in which you describe the relationship that the various law enforcement agencies at all levels have with law enforcement policies, laws, strategies, and the U.S. Constitution.
  • Use your course materials, the library, and relevant Internet research options to research U.S. Supreme Court landmark cases in the area of law enforcement. For instance, Terry v. Ohio (1968), which dealt with the law of stop and frisk.
  • Review the cases found in your research, and choose 1 of the cases to use for your memo. This is the starting point for this assignment.
  • Law enforcement agencies at all levels of the U.S. government devise law enforcement policies and crime fighting strategies, while staying within the Constitutional boundaries set by the U.S. Supreme Court. Your answer to the following questions can assist you in developing your memo:
    • How do national, state, and local agencies implement law enforcement policies and strategies while accounting for the requirements of the U.S. Constitution and other laws? Explain in detail.
    • What changes to law enforcement came about as a result of the U.S. Supreme Court’s decision in your chosen case? What did law enforcement have to do differently as a result of that decision? Discuss the practical implications.
    • When the U.S. Supreme Court renders a decision that impacts the way in which law enforcement agencies do their business, how do those agencies go about implementing the necessary changes to their policies and procedures? Explain in detail.

Be sure to reference all sources using APA style.

Final Answer

Hello, I have done your work. Thank you.
Hello, I have done your work. Thank you.

Running head: INTERNAL MEMO


Student’s name:



Internal memo
From: The Department of Homeland Security
To: The Undergraduate students in Homeland security department
Date: 16th April 2018

Subject: Detailed explanation of the topic

According to the supreme court of the United States, there are several landmark cases
witnessed within the several past years (Daley, 2013). The above cases have been witnessed in the
in the law enforcement area. The Miranda v. Arizona, 1966 is an example of such a case witnessed
in the Supreme Court of the United States. In 1966, the Supreme Court of the United States heard
this case concerning the tactics of interrogation utilized by the police (Stuart, 2004). There was the
passing of the decision of this case with 5-4 and justices referred to Fifth as well as Sixth
Amendments particularly those clauses that regarded the self-incrimination and right to an
Due to the result of this landmark decision, the statements that the defendant made to the
police officers are just admissible at the trial in case the defendant was informed about their rights.
It is currently referred to as the Miranda Rights and i...

JesseCraig (15721)
Carnegie Mellon University

The tutor managed to follow the requirements for my assignment and helped me understand the concepts on it.

The tutor was knowledgeable, will be using the service again.

Awesome quality of the tutor. They were helpful and accommodating given my needs.

Similar Questions
Related Tags

Brown University

1271 Tutors

California Institute of Technology

2131 Tutors

Carnegie Mellon University

982 Tutors

Columbia University

1256 Tutors

Dartmouth University

2113 Tutors

Emory University

2279 Tutors

Harvard University

599 Tutors

Massachusetts Institute of Technology

2319 Tutors

New York University

1645 Tutors

Notre Dam University

1911 Tutors

Oklahoma University

2122 Tutors

Pennsylvania State University

932 Tutors

Princeton University

1211 Tutors

Stanford University

983 Tutors

University of California

1282 Tutors

Oxford University

123 Tutors

Yale University

2325 Tutors