Aggressive Behaviors

Anonymous
timer Asked: Apr 19th, 2018
account_balance_wallet $5

Question Description

Introduction

The statement "Brain damage can cause aggressive behavior" raises the question of whether a violent offender, who is assessed to have any type of disinhibiting traumatic brain injury, is criminally responsible for his or her actions. As the public struggles with understanding the why of a crime, it becomes even more difficult when they are asked to forgive or accept less criminal responsibility for the cognitively impaired criminal.

The court system is full of cases where part of the defense was specifically focused on the offenders having less capacity to self-regulate their behaviors due to some type of brain dysfunction. However, it is rare that even when there is clear evidence of a significant impairment to their reasoning that the offender is found not responsible for some aspect of the crime. This may strike some as unfair. For example, epilepsy is also a brain dysfunction or neurological disorder but we do not expect people with epilepsy to not have seizures.

In the case of a person who has a permanent neurological disorder, how do we keep the public safe without discriminating against the damage implications such as impaired executive functioning, poor linear reasoning, or even inconsistent emotional regulation? Do we hold people accountable for their behavior when they have a physical condition? If they have a disorder that impinges on other people's rights, do we see them as accountable or in need of treatment or some combination of both? These questions are posed every day in real-world legal cases and answered by psychologists and neuropsychologists trained in forensic evaluation. It is a dynamic that criminal justice professionals have to account for as they develop their strategy for trial or disposition planning.

Instructions

In your main post:

  • Determine if medical or neuro-psychological testimony should be allowed in court, keeping in mind that there is no clear correlation between a type of brain damage and the type or level of criminal behavior.
  • Describe your position on how to accommodate for psychologically or biologically determined aggressive tendencies in the criminal justice domains, including trials.

Please include a reference. Does not have to be in formal essay format. this is for a discussion posting.

Tutor Answer

lopesamills
School: New York University

hi, you can find the attached document. if you have any questions please let me know.....

Running Head: THE USE OF NEURO-PSYCHOLOGICAL TESTIMONY

The Use of Neuro-Psychological Testimony
Name
Institutional Affiliation

1

THE USE OF NEURO-PSYCHOLOGICAL TESTIMONY

2

The Use of Neuro-Psychological Testimony
I do not feel whether medical or neuro-psychological testimony should be accepted in
court due to different factors. Although there is a growing concern about the use of “law and
neuroscience...

flag Report DMCA
Review

Anonymous
Excellent job

Similar Questions
Related Tags

Brown University





1271 Tutors

California Institute of Technology




2131 Tutors

Carnegie Mellon University




982 Tutors

Columbia University





1256 Tutors

Dartmouth University





2113 Tutors

Emory University





2279 Tutors

Harvard University





599 Tutors

Massachusetts Institute of Technology



2319 Tutors

New York University





1645 Tutors

Notre Dam University





1911 Tutors

Oklahoma University





2122 Tutors

Pennsylvania State University





932 Tutors

Princeton University





1211 Tutors

Stanford University





983 Tutors

University of California





1282 Tutors

Oxford University





123 Tutors

Yale University





2325 Tutors