190(2). Read the case readings very carefully and finish 3pages(800words) case questions.

User Generated

NobfbyhgrIbqxn

Business Finance

Description

Read the case readings very carefully and finish 3pages(800words) case questions.

Read the case readings on dropbox:https://www.dropbox.com/sh/uojuf741zz6u0jl/AACl1kE...

Answer 800words approximately case questions. No external references allowed.

Please read the requirements very carefully. And the most important, everything has to be 100 percent original, any kind of plagiarism cannot be accepted. Thank you so much!!

Unformatted Attachment Preview

Case Questions: try to keep the word counts in each section the same. FOUR questions total. Questions in red and bold. Do not copy and paste, or simply summarize up the whole information into paragraphs. I need personal thoughts, also critical thinking Do NOT use any other external references for ANY case analysis. Please cite the case only. 1. Discuss MSO’s corporate governance. Has the company been able to separate the ownership and managerial control? Read this first! 2. Evaluate the effectiveness of MSO’s board of directors (A). Have the directors been able to monitor and control the company (B)? Read this first! And also make evaluation with the framework below. You need to answer both questions. A: Using the VRIO framework to evaluate the effectiveness of MSO’s board of directors. Opportunity to apply VRIO as a course tool to see if it will give the organization competitive advantage to address their Strategic Decisions. VRIO framework VRIO framework is a theoretical framework that explains and predicts firm-level competitive advantage. According to this model, a firm can gain and sustain a competitive advantage only when it has resources that satisfy all of the VRIO criteria. Keep in mind that resources in the VRIO framework are broadly defined to include any assets as well as any capabilities and competencies that a firm can draw upon when formulating and implementing strategy. So to some degree, this presentation of the VRIO model summarizes all of our discussion in the chapter so far. B: Below is the guide you need to evaluate the board of directors. How did the board of directors accomplish their jobs. 3. Executive compensation is a method of governance mechanisms. Discuss Martha Stewart’s compensation and evaluate its effectiveness. Read this first! And make evaluation based on the guide. it is important that the effectiveness ties back to the strategic decisions, strategic alternatives, evaluation criteria. 4. Is MSO in financial trouble? Discuss the possibility of the market for corporate control. Will MSO become a takeover target? Critical Thinking: Applies appropriate weights/factors to analyze multiple objectives, principals and/or problem dimensions. Make evaluation of the market with the framework below. Discuss the possibility of the market for corporate control. PESTLE analysis To check how it works - https://www.nibusinessinfo.co.uk/content/pestle-analysisexample
Purchase answer to see full attachment
User generated content is uploaded by users for the purposes of learning and should be used following Studypool's honor code & terms of service.

Explanation & Answer

Work done buddy, to be uploaded shortly.Hope you find it satisfying. Looking forward to working with you more on the days ahead. Cheers.😇 😎
Attached.

Surname1
Name
Course
Tutor
Date
1. MSO’s corporate governance.
MSO has exhibited corporate governance in that despite having shareholders, it has hired
private individuals to head the company. The company is mainly being run by its founder and at
time CEO Martha Stewart. Apart from her, there is a board constituted to oversee the company’s
operations, being run by the chairman of the board.
Through time and despite the wrangles experienced in the company, the company has
failed to separate the ownership of the company and the company’s control by the management.
Even while being in prison twice, Martha Stewart was running the company. The new CEO Lyne
is said to have been visiting together with Koppelman Martha Stewart at the prison to discuss
business. It is candid that despite all the tries to separate the company, these attempts fail and
Stewart says she is MSO, she is the company. This tough stand of her has facilitated many of her
confidants to resign, as she rakes in much money at the expense of the company’s plummeting
revenues. In as much as Stewart finally didn’t assume CEO’s role, it is clear that her grip is tight
on the company and managerial control can’t be free of her grip.
2a. The effectiveness of the company’s board of directors
This company’s board of directors constituted of four main seats assigned specific roles
in the company. This demarcation of roles is so crucial as it stipulates the exact assigned duties
to the individuals, ensuring effective flow of command and execution of duties. Their board is

Surname2
also sort of independent as there are two external seats on the board. This is fundamental to
making the board represent well shareholders interests.
2b. Directors monitoring and control of the company
The directors have really tried in monitoring and taking control of the company. The
company has gone through a series of challenges where its revenues have plummeted but the
directors have worked together in partnership with the sitting chairman and CEO to bring the
company back to life. These directors represent the interests of the shareholders and thus must
run the company effectively. For the years the company’s founder was in prison, they have
facilitated smooth succession of CEOs. The board even managed to keep Stewart at bay from the
CEOs role for some time, a clear indication they were in control. The board also evaluated and
thereafter facilitat...

Similar Content

Related Tags