a summary of a current business incident

User Generated

jnajnajna

Writing

mgt16

UCSD

Description

submit a summary of a current (within the last 12 months) business incident—found via the news media-- describing its ethics parameters. The document should include the student’s assessment of the ethics issues, decisions, and actions within the situation. Application of the course “decision model” should be demonstrated. (Content of the paper will be no more than seven, double-spaced, stapled pages. A cover page is optional. A citation of information sources page should be at the end. Cover and sources pages do not count in page total. “Style” is “business efficient”, i.e., prose is acceptable, along with bullet points, checklists, tables or whatever structure clearly, efficiently communicates to the reader.)

Unformatted Attachment Preview

An Ethics-Focused Decision-Making Model 1. Determine the Facts a. Resist an immediate “judgment call” i. Be aware of how sports, for example, has influenced all of us to make quick choices of what is within the rules b. Gather all facts—not just ones supporting one point-of-view (people don't get facts and do no research at all. Not just the ones of preconceived notion) c. Check multiple sources of information (Google and Wiki are not sources) d. Differentiate between “facts” and “assumptions” (assumptions are necessary for analysis and progress. If heard enough people think it's a fact) e. “Follow the Money”—who makes money based upon which choices? (Money always causes a bias) 2. Identify the Ethical Issues Involved a.Are there dimensions of “right and wrong”; “fair or unfair”; “good or bad”? (Must be resolved by the alternative by the end of what you recommend) 3. Identify All the Stakeholders a.Who (Groups) and how many? (Shareholders, members of community, team, friends etc.. Identify who will be effected by a decision/situation) b.How might I be biased—how are certain Stakeholders “related” to me? (Do you have a bias are you related or fall in any of these categories. Be transparent and disclose that you have a bias in a situation) 4. Delineate (list) (and/or Create) Alternative Courses of Action a.Generate at least two different courses (There are always two sides to take action or not to take action. Doing nothing is always the first alternative. The other is to do something and something is where difference comes from. b.Imagine one “wild” scenario (This is how creativity gets sparked.) 5. Assess How the Alternatives will Affect Stakeholders a.Envision the results of each alternative decision/course of action (Make aTable: stakeholders by alternatives) b.Determine beneficial versus harmful consequences c.“Consider” the Law (The laws in the largest penal code of ethics. Sometimes course of action is ethical, but illegal or vice-a-versa) Civil rights movement was illegal though it was the ethical choice. d.Recognize your own potential “conflict of interest” Are you going to harm myself or anyone else? 6. Seek Guidance a.Close friends (seek advice) For paper who would speak to and why you would seek guidance from. By a table. b.People you respect c.Knowledge sources i. Subject matter experts ii. Reference Librarians iii.Authors iv.Researchers v. Professors vi.Pastors 7. Make a Decision; Act; Monitor the Outcome(s) a.Make a choice (Follow steps and make a decision) b.Do something constructive c.Be prepared to DEFEND your choice with logical, persuasive arguments d.“All Solutions Just Create Different Problems”—Follow up and Correct An Ethics-Focused Decision-Making Model 1.Determine the Facts 2.Identify the Ethical Issues Involved 3.Identify All the Stakeholders 4.Delineate (and/or Create) Alternative Courses of Action 5.Assess How the Alternatives will Affect Stakeholders 6.Seek Guidance 7.Make a Decision; Act; Monitor the Outcome(s) Case 1: Nathaniel 1 Samuel Nathaniel A14211516 MGT16-A00 Robert H. Campbell TA: Chanan Batra May 2, 2017 Sexual Harassment in The Eye of Uber 1. Determine the Facts Recently, a sexual harassment scandal in the work field occurred at Uber. Here are some facts and details about the case: -Susan Fowler was being sexually harassed by one of her supervisors who was trying to get her have sex with him through chat messages. ("NY Times) - The Human Resource (HR) team ignored her report. One of the upper management said that Uber will not be comfortable punishing him for his innocent mistake ('NY Times). -The CEO of Uber, Travis Kalanick thinks that this sort of action would lead be discharge from office. He said on The Guardian, “Anyone who behaves this way or thinks this is OK will be fired." ("'The Guardian) Due to Susan Fowler's sexual harassment report, Uber recently employed Eric Holder, who was a former United States attorney general, to lead the internal investigation. (The Guardian) - Uber did not treat the case seriously, leading to the resignation of the female engineer/employee. 2. Identify All the Ethical Issues Involved -The ethical issues involved in this case are inequality, humanity, and security for these reasons; women sometimes treated in a bad way, and asking someone to have sex with him through chat messages is not appropriate and can be considered as a sexual harassment. How Human Resources team responded was not as expected. This
Purchase answer to see full attachment
User generated content is uploaded by users for the purposes of learning and should be used following Studypool's honor code & terms of service.

Explanation & Answer

Attached.

Surname 1
Name
Instructor
Course
Date
Harassment of a Doctor at United Airlines: Ethical Considerations
1. Determination of the Facts
-

On April 2017, United Airlines officials used law enforcement officers to forcibly
remove one of its passengers, Dr. David Dao, from one of its planes that had been
overbooked.

-

It happened after Dr. Dao had been requested to leave to give room for airline staff but he
refused, claiming that he had an urgent patient to attend to.

-

Three other passengers who had been randomly selected alongside Dr. Dao complied
with the request and paved the way for the members of staff to get into the airplane.

-

The staff called law enforcement officers. Dao was screaming all along as the officers
used excessive force to pull him off, and he sustained some serious injuries, especially
after he hit an armrest right on his face. He was dragged past passengers who watched
helplessly. There was blood on Dr. Dao’s face and mouth.

-

The incident drew global outrage after it was shared on social media. Politicians and
other whistleblowers were the first to air their concerns and call for investigation to
unveil what exactly had transpired. President Trump was among those who scolded the
airlines firm, labeling the incident as ‘horrible.’

-

The following day, a statement sent by the CEO of United Airlines, Oscar Munoz, to his
employees seemed to justify the actions of his team, pointing out that the customer had

Surname 2
reacted inappropriately when he was requested to peacefully leave the plane. Munoz said
that the doctor was belligerent and disruptive.
-

Unfortunately, this did not go well with the public, and Munoz was criticized more
heavily for his careless words.

-

Two days later, he sent another statement, but this time to the public, apologizing for the
actions of his employees and promising his customers that the incident would never be
...


Anonymous
Really helpful material, saved me a great deal of time.

Studypool
4.7
Trustpilot
4.5
Sitejabber
4.4

Related Tags