Description
Unformatted Attachment Preview
Purchase answer to see full attachment
Explanation & Answer
Attached.
1
Part 3: Smiling Project
2
Effects of Smiling on Interpersonal Relationships
The focus of the Article
Krämer et al. (2013) delved into the dynamics of smiling in social interactions with
emphasis on the value of smiling despite the differences in variables such as gender. The
study finding shows that there is an equal distribution of smiles between males and females at
50-50, with both males and females exhibiting light smiles that tend to last longer than full
smiles. Despite the similarity in observed patterns, a slight difference exists across genders in
terms of the frequency of the smiling act. Notably, women tended to smile more frequently
than men. This phenomenon triggers the line of inquiry to investigate the manner in which
individuals consider and react to smiling behavior presented by virtual agents and the social
cognitive procedures that govern the reactions of people.
The focal point of psychological research is exploring human behavior in the context
of social interactions. Krämer et al. (2013) sought to delve into smiling as a form of facial
expression, and they tried to understand human communication by unraveling details about
the impact it has on human relationships. Further, the researchers aimed to establish how
people perceive and respond to the smiling behavior of virtual agents in terms of exposing the
exact social cognition process linked to such behavior.
The Research Question and Results of the Study
Krämer et al.'s (2013) line of inquiry was informed by the following research question
[RQ]: Is there a gender difference in smiling based on the smiling max shown? A 3×2
between-subjects experiment was designed, in which the only variable was the number of
activities of the smiling agent considering the gender of the participants. The dependent
measures taken were ratings of the agent and the smiling behavior of the participants
themselves. The result of the preparatory analysis showed that subjects were able to
recognize the smiling behavior of the agent but showed mild confusion about the laughing
3
behavior of the agent. The study sought to understand whether gender influences reactions to
the agent's smiles.
The Research Method Used and Clues in the Article
Krämer et al. (2013) adopted the 3×2 between-subjects experimental design to
measure gender differences in relation to the smiling behavior of a virtual agent. As far as
differences in the smiling behavior of the agents were concerned, assessments were made for
the agents, the effect on their own smiling behaviors, and assessed evaluations. Preparatory
analyses showed the participants' ability to perceive the smiles of the agent but their uncertain
perception of the laughter of the agent. In doing so, it allowed the researchers to explore
whether gender influences reactions to the smiles of the agent.
The Connections Between My Experience of Smiling at People for a Day
Krämer et al.'s (2013) article on human behavior in virtual interactions acts as a point
of reference and aligns with my past experience in social interactions. The study findings
helped me make connections and align them with social cognitive theory. Specifically, the
social cognitive theory holds that mental processes influence behavior and that individuals
mimic behaviors in virtual settings. In the study, the virtual agents acted as models for
reference, and the study participants showcased the role of social cues in shaping human
interaction.
Additionally, behavior as a variable is influenced by environmental factors. In this
case, the act of smiling, as depicted by my actions in the past, aimed to create a positive
atmosphere at the YMCA and subsequently enhance friendly interactions. Through my
actions, I was able to impact individuals' experiences, which is consistent with behaviorism's
model about the effects of stimuli and responses. Th...