Attached.

1
Negotiations

Student’s Name
University Name
Course
Tutor
Date

2
Negotiations

Function of a BATNA

BATNA stands for Best Alternative to a Negotiated Agreement. Regarding its function, it
provides a party in a negotiation with the best possible outcome in case negotiations fail. In the
context of a negotiation, BATNA is a person’s best source of power. BATNA is important in a
negotiation because it provides an alternative course of action if the negotiation flops. BATNA
mitigates risk in a negotiation. In other words, it acts as a safety net in a negotiation. It gives the
negotiator a suitable alternative in case a satisfactory agreement is not reached in the current
negotiation. Such mitigation of risk is vital because it prevents a person from being entirely
dependent on one deal and helps them avoid unfavorable outcomes. BATNA provides
empowerment in a negotiation. When a party know their BATNA, they are empowered during a
negotiation. An awareness of the best alternative comes with a crucial degree of confidence in
the negotiation process. BATNA enhances decision making in a negotiation. It enhances the
objective assessment of whether the proposed agreement is better than the alternative. Other
benefits of BATNA are enhanced flexibility and reduced pressure.

The basic elements of any negotiation include communication, commitments, options,
alternatives and BATNA, relationships, legitimacy and interests. Interests refer to the
negotiation’s fundamental drivers. Experienced negotiators will probe the stated positions of
their counterparts to get a better understanding of the underlying interests. Legitimacy means
some form of fairness in the deal being made. A negotiation will be successful if the proposals
are seen as fair and legitimate. The relationship between the parties in a negotiation is very
crucial. Dispute resolution will be easier if the patties have a trusting relationship. Alternatives

3
and BATNA mean what a party will do if the negotiations crumble. Options are any available
choices the parties in a negotiation may consider to satisfy their interests, including trades,
contingencies, and conditions. Options are the potential agreements or pieces of the potential
agreement. Commitments are agreements, demands, offers, or promises made by the parties.
Lastly, communication is crucial in a negotiation. Effective communication enhances the
conveying of interests.

A target point in any negotiation is the actual goal a person is trying to reach. The reservation
point refers to the highest price or the lowest price that the negotiator is wiling to accept in the
negotiation. More precisely, it is the point at which the negotiator would rather walk away from a
negotiation than accept a higher or lower offer. The reservation point is therefore the worst
acceptable outcome or breakeven point. The function of a target point is to define the goals on a
negotiation. The function of a reservation point is defining the highest or lowest price that the
negotiator is willing to take in a negotiation. The function of BATNA is to provide the
negotiating parties with an alternative if the negotiations fail and there is no likelihood of an
agreement being made.

Why should negotiators segment the issues in a negotiation into multiple issues and identify
issue alternatives rather than engage in a single-issue negotiation?

Instead of engaging in a single-issue negotiation, an investigator is advised to segment the issues
in the negotiation into multiple issues and identify issue alternatives. First, doing so will increase
the possibility of win-win tradeoffs. Second, it will prevent the negotiator from becoming fully
positional. Third, it will force the negotiator to prioritize their preferences and values. Fourth, it
may result in more creative outcomes. Fifth, it will reveal multiple issues from what might seem

4
to be a single-issue negotiation. The negotiator should look at the possibility of the issues being
multi-faceted. If the issues have several facets, it is wise to unbundle them. Doing so will give
the negotiator more issues on the table t be discussed as well as more options to get a value
generating and creative solution.

Difference between interests, positions, and issues

Positions are the particular stances taken by parties in a negotiation. They typically outline their
preferred results. On the other hand, interests refer to the reason behind the parties’ positions.
Interests therefore define the problem. The issue is the reason for the negotiation. My side’s
interest in the International Panda Negotiation was ecosystem protection. The position was that
pandas must be protected from extinction.
One of the key threats to the negotiators’ ability
A key threat to the negotiators’ ability to consider the negotiators’ counterparty’s perspective is
egocentrism. This is the tendency to focus on one’s own priorities and interests. It is crucial for
the negotiator to ask the counterparty diagnostic questions regarding their underlying priorities
and interests. Doing so will put the negotiator in a good position to reach integrative agreements
than a negotiator who does not ask the other party about their priorities. Diagnostic questions
will assist the negotiator to discover where the value is. Also, such diagnostic questions do not
give the other party ideas about lying or misrepresenting themselves. When the other party is
asked about their BATNA for example, they might be tempted to exaggerate or lie. It is unclear
how or why the negotiator would choose to lie about their underlying needs. Therefore, the

5
effectiveness of diagnostic questions is based on the fact that they do not place the negotiators on
the defensive.

Difference between distributive and integrative bargaining.

Distributive bargaining focuses on getting the best possible deal for oneself in a negotiation.
Distributive bargaining ...