Develop an intervention (your capstone project), as a solution to the patient, family, or population problem you've defined. Submit the proposed intervention to the faculty for review and approval. This solution needs to be implemented (shared) with your patient, family, or group. You are not to share your intervention with your patient, family, or group or move on to Assessment 5 before your faculty reviews/approves the solution you submit in Assessment 4. In a separate written deliverable, write a 5-7 page analysis of your intervention.Please submit both your solution/intervention and the 5-7 page analysis to complete Assessment 4.Introduction In your first three assessments, you applied new knowledge and insight gleaned from the literature, from organizational data, and from direct consultation with the patient, family, or group (and perhaps with subject matter and industry experts) to your assessment of the problem. You’ve examined the problem from the perspectives of leadership, collaboration, communication, change management, policy, quality of care, patient safety, costs to the system and individual, technology, care coordination, and community resources. Now it’s time to turn your attention to proposing an intervention (your capstone project), as a solution to the problem.Preparation In this assessment, you’ll develop an intervention as a solution to the health problem you’ve defined. To prepare for the assessment, think about an appropriate intervention, based on your work in the preceding assessments, that will produce tangible, measurable results for the patient, family, or group. In addition, you might consider using a root cause analysis to explore the underlying reasons for a problem and as the basis for developing and implementing an action plan to address the problem. Some appropriate interventions include the following: Creating an educational brochure. Producing an educational voice-over PowerPoint presentation or video focusing on your topic. Creating a teaching plan for your patient, family, or group. Recommending work process or workflow changes addressing your topic. Plan to spend at least 3 direct practicum hours working with the same patient, family, or group.In addition, you may wish to complete the following: Review the assessment instructions and scoring guide to ensure that you understand the work you will be asked to complete and how it will be assessed. Conduct sufficient research of the scholarly and professional literature to inform your work and meet scholarly expectations for supporting evidence. Instructions Complete this assessment in two parts: (a) develop an intervention as a solution to the problem and (b) submit your proposed intervention, with a written analysis, to your faculty for review and approval.Part 1 Develop an intervention, as a solution to the problem, based on your assessment and supported by data and scholarly, evidence-based sources.Incorporate relevant aspects of the following considerations that shaped your understanding of the problem: Leadership. Collaboration. Communication. Change management. Policy. Quality of care. Patient safety. Costs to the system and individual. Technology. Care coordination. Community resources. Part 2 Submit your proposed intervention to your faculty for review and approval.In a separate written deliverable, write a 5–7 page analysis of your intervention. Summarize the patient, family, or population problem. Explain why you selected this problem as the focus of your project. Explain why the problem is relevant to your professional practice and to the patient, family, or group. In addition, address the requirements outlined below. These requirements correspond to the scoring guide criteria for this assessment, so be sure to address each main point. Read the performance-level descriptions for each criterion to see how your work will be assessed. In addition, note the additional requirements for document format and length and for supporting evidence. Define the role of leadership and change management in addressing the problem. Explain how leadership and change management strategies influenced the development of your proposed intervention. Explain how nursing ethics informed the development of your proposed intervention. Include a copy of the intervention/solution/professional product. Propose strategies for communicating and collaborating with the patient, family, or group to improve outcomes associated with the problem. Identify the patient, family, or group. Discuss the benefits of gathering their input to improve care associated with the problem. Identify best-practice strategies from the literature for effective communication and collaboration to improve outcomes. Explain how state board nursing practice standards and/or organizational or governmental policies guided the development of your proposed intervention. Cite the standards and/or policies that guided your work. Describe research that has tested the effectiveness of these standards and/or policies in improving outcomes for this problem. Explain how your proposed intervention will improve the quality of care, enhance patient safety, and reduce costs to the system and individual. Cite evidence from the literature that supports your conclusions. Identify relevant and available sources of benchmark data on care quality, patient safety, and costs to the system and individual. Explain how technology, care coordination, and the utilization of community resources can be applied in addressing the problem. Cite evidence from the literature that supports your conclusions. Write concisely and directly, using active voice.

This assignment should be three pages in length, plus an additional page titled Works Cited, which should include information on your outside source, structured in MLA format. Paper must be double spaced, indented at the beginning of each paragraph and include all the other components required of MLA format. You may use any of the stories from our textbook, as long as they are relevant to your message or theme. You may also use any or a combination of the different organizational patterns: narrative, description, etc. This assignment will be submitted through a program called turnitin that checks if you plagerized anything.

Differentiating materials for specific student needs is necessary for a successful lesson and helps all students engage in the learning.1-- Review your unit plan on Rainbows. During your unit plan review focus on the following:Appropriate implementation and engagement strategiesAccommodations, resources, and materials that will allow for differentiationAssessment techniques that will be utilized during the unitFollowing the unit plan review, work with your mentor teacher to select one lesson to implement with a small group of students identified by your mentor teacher. Inform your mentor teacher that this lesson plan implementation will be videotaped.In 250-500 words, reflect on the unit plan review with your mentor teacher:Strengths of the unit planChanges you will make to the lesson based on feedback from your mentor teacher in the following areas:Implementation and engagement strategiesAccommodations, resources, and materials used for differentiationAssessment techniques2--Problem-Based Lesson PlanScience naturally incorporates multiple content areas. Consider language as a means of communication is a basic scientific process discussed in Topic 1. Mathematics is used to obtain measurements and graph data, and social studies provides a link between the application of science and society. When science curriculum is integrated across multiple content areas students experience more meaningful and relevant learning. A problem-centered approach where students investigate problems in which they are interested reinforces positive attitudes towards science and learning in general. For this assignment, create an integrated problem-based lesson plan for one of the lessons in your unit plan. Use the “COE Lesson Plan Template” to design a lesson that incorporates the following:Read - 1-16 of “How to Develop a Problem-Based Science Unit,” located on the VISTA website (2014).http://physics.gmu.edu/~hgeller/vistaPBL.pdfFeedback from your mentor teacher about appropriate strategies, accommodations, resources and materials that will allow for differentiated instruction to meet At least one additional content area standard that will be integrated into the lesson plan. (This content area will also be integrated into the lesson plans you will complete in Topic 7 for the benchmark assignment.)Following the lesson plan, write a 150-250 word reflection, provide a rationale for why you included the additional content area, and how it best integrates with problem-based instruction in the science content of your unit.