MN507_U10_D1_Global Health Agenda

User Generated

werobyyr

Health Medical

Description

Please review the Discussion Board Participation grading rubric under Course Resources in the Grading Rubrics section.

This is important information that will ensure that you earn maximum points. Your postings should be qualitative and provide substantive depth that advances the discussion.

Please see the Kaplan Writing Center located in the student portal for assistance with writing, APA, and online communication.

Minimum (3) references no later than 2015

Discussion Topic 1: Global Health Agenda

What are some of the opportunities that are available to develop an interdisciplinary approach to the advance of the World Health Organization (WHO) global health agenda? Describe how the application of multiculturalism and diversity practices and policies can impact the organization you work in respect to those opportunities. Summarize what you have learned in this course to advance how the role of an advance practice nurse can influence this global approach.

Unformatted Attachment Preview

Discussion Board (DB) Participation Rubric Discussion boards (DBs) are what make an online course a course and not an independent study. DBs are vital to demonstrating that the learner has met the expected course level outcomes. Collaboration between peers and your instructor in the DB is an important aspect of the online learning experience and is expected in the course. Any exceptions to the following DB rubric will be at the instructor’s discretion. The purpose of a DB is to stimulate critical thinking in a scholarly manner. Critical thinking consists of synthesis, creating solutions, application to real world situations, and testing, debating, and defending evidence-based solutions. Critical thinking is not repetition of assigned reading material. Outside research of the literature is a vital part of the DB. Posts need to be substantive. This means that responses such as "I agree" or "great post" do not meet grading rubric requirements. Initial posts for each discussion question (DQ) is due no later than Saturday of the unit week. The initial post must be an answer to the DQ topic, not a comment on other posts. Initial posts for each DB must also include a minimum of three peer-reviewed citations. Citations must include outside sources and no more than one citation from assigned course readings may be used each week. Additionally, comments should also include a citation to support assertions. While the discussion board tool limits the ability to use APA formatting (e.g., hanging indents), posts must include the required elements of an APA in-text citation and list of references. Inappropriate Below Average Average Above Average 1 2 3 4 Score Weight Final Score Provides an initial post on or after Sunday. N/A N/A Provides an initial post by Saturday. 15% 0.00 Does not post responses to others. Posts one comment per Discussion topic. Posts 2 comments per Discussion topic on separate days. At least one comment includes a citation. Posts more than 2 comments per Discussion topic on separate days (resulting in total participation on three different days throughout the discussion). At least two comments include a citation. 10% 0.00 N/A Participates, but does not post anything that encourages others to respond to the posting. Attempts to motivate the group discussion. Frequently attempts to motivate the group discussion. 5% 0.00 Submission does not relate to the topic. Answers some question/topics with some clearly stated opinions. Supports post using text only. Answers all questions with opinions and ideas that are stated clearly. Supports post using text and at least two peer-reviewed sources. Answers all questions with opinions/ideas creatively and clearly. Supports post using several outside, peerreviewed sources. 35% 0.00 APA Format Major errors or no APA format used. Minor errors with APA format. Rare errors with APA format. No errors with APA format. 10% 0.00 Spelling/ Grammar/ Formatting/ Mechanics Significant errors in spelling and/or grammar. Major flaws in writing mechanics and formatting. Poor spelling and grammar are apparent. Uses Standard American English with rare errors and misspellings. Consistently uses Standard American English with no misspellings. Appropriate mechanics and formatting. 10% 0.00 Length Submission does not meet length requirements. N/A N/A The initial post is at least 200 words. This does not include repeating the DB question or the citations and references. 15% 0.00 100% 0.00 0 ##### Initial post timeliness Additional comment requirement Engagement Content Quality Initial Response Final Score Percentage Total available points = 4 Instructions: First enter total points possible in cell C15, under the rubric. Next enter scores (between 0 and 4) into yellow cells only in column F. Low Rubric Score High 3.5 4.0 2.5 3.49 1.7 2.49 0.0 1.00 Grade points Low 0 0 0 0 Percentage High 0 0 0 0 Low 90% 80% 70% 0 High 100% 89.99% 79.99% 69.99%
Purchase answer to see full attachment
User generated content is uploaded by users for the purposes of learning and should be used following Studypool's honor code & terms of service.

Explanation & Answer

Attached.

Running Head: ADVANCING THE WHO GLOBAL HEALTH AGENDA

Advancing the WHO Global Health Agenda
Student’s Name
Institution of Affiliation
Course Name
Date

1

ADVANCING THE WHO GLOBAL HEALTH AGENDA
Opportunities Available To Develop an Interdisciplinary Approach to Advance the World
Health Organization (WHO) Global Health Agenda
The WHO global health agenda aims at improving health for all individuals in all
countries through wellness promotion and elimination of diseases, disabilities and death which
are avoidable. One of the opportunities available is the integration of health promotion and
disease prevention measures which are population based with clinical care at individual level
which requires the collaboration of healthcare professionals at all levels (Levine, 2015).
Globalization and the ability to manage interdependence is another opportunity which generally
promo...


Anonymous
Super useful! Studypool never disappoints.

Studypool
4.7
Trustpilot
4.5
Sitejabber
4.4

Similar Content

Related Tags