Description
it has 25 questions, there just few examples. you can check the document to finish the 25 questions.
1. The expression debate questions used in argument refers to
2. All racists have shaved heads.
Jerry does not have a shaved head.
Therefore, Jerry is not a racist.
Is the above argument “valid”? Explain your answer.
VALID/NOT VALID (circle one, then explain)
3. “people think non-violence is really weak and non-militant. These are misconceptions that people have because they don’t understand what non-violence means. Non-violence takes more guts, if I can put it bluntly, than violence…We are convinced that non-violence is more powerful than violence. We are convinced that non-violence supports you if you have a just and moral cause. If you use violence, you have to sell part of yourself for that violence. Then you are no longer a master of your own struggle.” (Cesar E. Chavez)
Analyze the argument above by underlining the conclusion and numbering the premises(reasons) given.
4.“No doctor should have the right to allow a patient to die. No doctor is God.”
Identify the conclusion and the premise in the above statement (i.e. which sentence is the conclusion, and which is the premise?)
5. “If only 1 percent of the car owners in America did not use their cars for one day a week, they would save 42 million gallons of gas a year and keep 840 million pounds of CO2 out of the atmosphere.”
Express the implied conclusion in the above statement
6. None of Alice’s friends are business majors.
Deborah is not a friend of Alice.
Therefore, Deborah is not a business major.
Is the above argument “valid”? Explain your answer.
VALID/NOT VALID (circle one, then explain).
Unformatted Attachment Preview
Purchase answer to see full attachment
Explanation & Answer
thank you for working with me
Running head: CRITICAL THINKING QUESTIONS
Critical Thinking Questions
Name:
Institution:
1
CRITICAL THINKING QUESTIONS
2
1. The expression debate questions used in argument refers to (circle one):
a.
A topic.
b.
A challenge to debate.
c.
A question designed to produce a neutral focus for different positions on an issue.
d.
Ant statement that begins with the words “Is,” “Does,” or “Should.”
e.
None of the above.
2. All racists have shaved heads.
Jerry does not have a shaved head.
Therefore, Jerry is not a racist.
Is the above argument “valid”? Explain your answer.
VALID/NOT VALID (circle one, then explain). An argument is valid if it contains the following
conditional or hypothetical property: If all the premises are true, then the conclusion cannot be
false. In the above case we know that in fact the first premise is false (not all racists have shaved
heads) but the argument is still valid because if the premise were true it would be impossible for
the conclusion to be false.
3. “People think non-violence is really weak and non-militant. These are misconceptions
that people have because they don’t understand what non-violence means. Non-violence
takes more guts, if I can put it bluntly, than violence…We are convinced that non-violence
is more powerful than violence. We are convinced that non-violence supports you if you
CRITICAL THINKING QUESTIONS
3
have a just and moral cause. If you use violence, you have to sell part of yourself for that
violence. Then you are no longer a master of your own struggle.” (Cesar E. Chavez)
Analyze the argument above by underlining the conclusion and numbering the premises
(reasons) given.
P1 People think non-violence is really weak and non-militant. These are misconceptions that
people have because they don’t understand what non-violence means.
P2 Non-violence takes more guts, if I can put it bluntly, than violence…We are convinced that
non-violence is more powerful than violence.
P3 We are convinced that non-violence supports you if you have a just and moral cause.
C If you use violence, you have to sell part of yourself for that violence. Then you are no longer
a master of your own struggle.
4. “No doctor should have the right to allow a patient to die. No doctor is God.”
Identify the conclusion and the premise in the above statement (i.e. which sentence is the
conclusion, and which is the premise?)
Premise: No doctor is God.
Conclusion: No doctor should have the right to allow ...