Carolyn Fluehr-Lobban – Cultural Relativism

User Generated

HFRE_ERZBIRQ_YRTNY_649

Humanities

Description

No sources needed. Opinion based. Extremely short responses is all that is required.

  1. What prompted Fluehr-Lobban to pass moral judgment on the societies she was studying?
  2. How does she justify herself as an anthropologist who is sensitive to the feelings of the people she was judging?
  3. How, in the opinion of Fluehr-Lobban, is “cultural relativism” being misused by some anthropologists?
  4. What is the downside of taking a more active role in getting reform? Imagine that you are an anthropologist and that the native hosts you are studying refuse you access to the population being studied. Does Fluehr-Lobban recommend soft-pedalling the activism?

Post your thoughts and comments to all the above questions after reading the article by Carolyn Fluehr-Lobban.

User generated content is uploaded by users for the purposes of learning and should be used following Studypool's honor code & terms of service.

Explanation & Answer

Hello buddy, here is your paper. check and confirm that your are ok. I am looking forward to more invites. thank you and bye
Attached.

Surname 1
Name
Subject
Professor
Date
Cultural Relativism by Carolyn Fluehr-Lobban

1.

What prompted Fluehr-Lobban to pass moral judgment on the societies she was

studying?

First, Fluer-Lobban made the observation that anthropology was not just about observing and
reporting. There was the need for anthropologists to study cultures and use the information they
gather to safeguard the rights of the people and cultures they study. She was prompted to pass
moral judgments on the societies she...


Anonymous
Just what I needed. Studypool is a lifesaver!

Studypool
4.7
Trustpilot
4.5
Sitejabber
4.4

Related Tags