Provide 2 answers for both 2 QuestionsEach answer has to be minimun of 200 wordsNO PLAGARISM1. What is the relationship between corruption in a country and economic growth? Is corruption always bad?2. Free market economies stimulate greater economic growth, whereas state-directed economies stifle growth. Discuss.

IntroductionThe purpose of the Core Assessment is to introduce students to database analysis in consumer behavior, and decision making based on data (CLO 2, 3, 4 & 5). Students will:Use the Student Data File located in the student file folder.Analyze the data and explain the marketing implications as it relates to using customer profiles for future marketing strategy.DirectionsUse the DDB Life Style StudyTM Data located in the student data files to analyze the following questions:Using the DDB data (Tables 1B through 7B) describe the major determinants of the following search-related behaviors and beliefs. What are the marketing implications?Consult consumer reports before making major purchasesInformation in advertising helps me make better decisionsSome consumers feel more technology savvy than others. Examine the DDB data in Tables 1B through 7B to determine what characterizes one who is likely to feel tech savvy.Using Table 3B, specifically examine the relationship between consumer perceptions of being tech savvy and the two search-related variables in Question 1. What are the relationships and implications?Using the questions provided, please write a 2-3 page report (in essay format) detailing your analysis of the case. Use the following format:Double-spaced Microsoft Word document using 1 inch left and right margins.Formatted following APA formatting rules.Integrate Consumer behavior theory from the textbook and other sources.Provide a reference page and in-text citations.Enter page numbers on all pages, including the first page.Spell check and proofread your reportRubricDDB Case AnalysisDDB Case AnalysisCriteriaRatingsPtsThis criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeSummary of Case10.0 ptsExceptionalExceptional summary of case, thoroughly discussing all relevant Points8.0 ptsExceeds ExpectationsProvides a thorough summary of case, mentioning all relevant points6.0 ptsMeets ExpectationsAn adequate summary of the case, mentioning most of the relevant points. Maximum points4.0 ptsDoes Not Meet ExpectationsLeaves out 1-2 important aspects of the case demonstrating a less than thorough understanding of the case.2.0 ptsUnacceptableLeaves out 3 or more important aspects of the case demonstrating a less than thorough understanding of the case.10.0 ptsThis criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeInterpretation of Data10.0 ptsExceptionalDemonstrates outstanding understanding of the data with accurate interpretation8.0 ptsExceeds ExpectationsDemonstrates a thorough understanding of the data with accurate interpretation6.0 ptsMeets ExpectationsDemonstrates a passable understanding of the data with mostly accurate interpretation.4.0 ptsDoes Not Meet ExpectationsDemonstrates a less than thorough understanding of the data making 3-5 mistakes in interpretation.2.0 ptsUnacceptableDemonstrates a less than thorough understanding of the data making more than 5 mistakes in interpretation10.0 ptsThis criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeUnderstanding of Concepts Involved10.0 ptsExceptionalDemonstrates a remarkable understanding of the concepts involved8.0 ptsExceeds ExpectationsDemonstrates a good understanding of the concepts involved.6.0 ptsMeets ExpectationsDemonstrates a fair understanding of the concepts involved.4.0 ptsDoes Not Meet ExpectationsDemonstrate a less than impressive understanding of the concepts involved.0.0 ptsUnacceptableDemonstrates little if any of the concepts involved.10.0 ptsThis criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeOrganization10.0 ptsExceptionalWritten work is exceptionally well organized with clear headings and subheadings. Tables and charts are especially clear.8.0 ptsExceeds ExpectationsWritten work is well organized with clear headings and subheadings. Tables and charts are easy to understand.6.0 ptsMeets ExpectationsWritten work is fairly well organized with some headings and subheadings lacking clarity. Tables and charts could use improvement4.0 ptsDoes Not Meet ExpectationsFair but some sections seem out of place. Some headings may be missing. Tables difficult to understand.0.0 ptsUnacceptableFair but some sections seem out of place. Some headings may be missing. Tables difficult to understand.10.0 ptsThis criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeWriting Style, Grammar, Spelling and Formatting5.0 ptsExceptionalWriting style is outstanding throughout the paper and appropriate for this type of paper. The plan has been thoroughly spellchecked and proofread. Almost no grammatical or spelling errors. No formatting errors.4.0 ptsExceeds ExpectationsWriting style is uniform throughout the paper and appropriate for this type of paper. The plan has been thoroughly spellchecked and proofread. Some grammatical or spelling errors. Some formatting errors.3.0 ptsMeets ExpectationsWriting style is somewhat choppy throughout the paper and not totally appropriate for this type of paper. A few spelling, proofreading, grammatical and formatting errors.2.0 ptsDoes Not Meet ExpectationsThere are noticeable spelling and grammatical errors. Some formatting errors.0.0 ptsUnacceptableThere are noticeable spelling and grammatical errors. Some formatting errors.5.0 ptsThis criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeReferences5.0 ptsExceptionalMaterial used in the writing of this report is extremely well referenced both within the document and on the reference page. References are very good. 4-5 references.4.0 ptsExceeds ExpectationsMaterial used in the writing of this report is appropriately referenced both within the document and on the reference page. References are good. 2-3 references.3.0 ptsMeets ExpectationsMaterial used in the writing of this report is referenced with minor errors, within the document or on the reference page. References are acceptable. 2 references2.0 ptsDoes Not Meet ExpectationsMaterial used in the writing of this report is referenced with minor errors, within the document or on the reference page. References are acceptable. 2 references0.0 ptsUnacceptableNo citations or references, or references are of very poor/unreliable quality. 0 references. *plagiarism on the final draft of the case study can result in a 0 on the entire report!!!5.0 ptsTotal Points: 50.0

Assessment InstructionsOverviewIn this assessment, you will complete an employment application questionnaire in which you analyze a personal management experience. The scenario presented here will be applicable to future assessments.PreparationReview the Atha Application Questionnaire [DOCX]. Use it and the scenario below to complete this assessment.ScenarioImagine that after exploring online job postings, you submitted an application and resume to Atha Corp for a management position. Atha markets its product—unique lighting products (wall, pendant, floor, table, and nightlights)—through a series of regional distributors and directly online. A short time later you received the following e-mail.Atha Corporation HR E-mailDear Applicant,Thank you for your interest in employment at Atha. We have received your application packet. The next step for candidates is to provide a narrative response to the questions in the attached document. Please return your completed document to me.Once we receive your responses, we will review them and notify you of the next steps.Good luck! Sincerely,Thomas HardyHuman Resources RecruiterAtha CorporationInstructionsRespond to the scenario by completing the Atha Application Questionnaire [DOCX].Additional RequirementsYour assessment should also meet the following requirements:Format: Use the Atha Application Questionnaire document to complete this assessment.Length: 3–4 pages, double-space lines.Written communication:Express your main points, arguments, and conclusions coherently.Use correct grammar and mechanics.Proofread your writing.Competencies MeasuredBy successfully completing this assessment, you will demonstrate your proficiency in the following course competencies and assessment scoring guide criteria:Competency 1: Analyze characteristics and behaviors of effective managers.Analyze one's own approach to management of a specified project or event.Justify why chosen management characteristics are appropriate for a specified situation.Competency 3: Communicate effectively and professionally.Convey clear meaning in active voice, with minimal issues in grammar, usage, word choice, spelling, or mechanical errors.Describe an instance where one was required to manage a group, team, or project.Assessment ResourcesThe following is required to complete the assessment.Atha Application Questionnaire [DOCX].Introduction to the Fundamentals of ManagementThe following resources focus on the fundamental principles of management and their relationship to the modern workplace environment and important issues that are frequently encountered by managers.Robbins, S. P., Coulter, M., & DeCenzo, D. A. (2020). Fundamentals of management: Management myth debunked! (11th ed.). Boston, MA: Pearson. Available in the courseroom via the VitalSource Bookshelf link.Chapter 1, "Managers and Management in Today’s Workplace." Chapter 2, "The Management Environment." CRITERIAPROFICIENTDISTINGUISHEDAnalyze one's own approach to management of a specified project or event.Analyzes one's own approach to management of a specified project or event with superior insight and detail that demonstrates a good appraisal of management principles.Justify why chosen management characteristics are appropriate for a specified situation.Provides strong justification of why chosen management characteristics are appropriate for a specified situation with support of specific examples of why the characteristics are sound choices.Convey clear meaning in active voice, with minimal issues in grammar, usage, word choice, spelling, or mechanical errors.Conveys clear purpose, in a tone and style well-suited to the intended audience. Supports assertions, arguments, and conclusions with relevant, credible, and convincing evidence. Exhibits strict and nearly flawless adherence to organizational, professional, and scholarly writing standards, including APA style and formatting.Describe an instance where one was required to manage a group, team, or project.Describes an instance where one was required to manage a group, team, or project in sufficient detail to support a subsequent analysis of actions taken.