Given 12 research studies, complete the literature review matrix below. Include the research question,
purpose, theoretical framework, research design, methodology, method, sample, and findings. Most of
this information can be found in the abstract.
Research Study
1.
Brodie, K.
(2011)
2. Bouck, E. C.,
Satsangi, R.,
Doughty, T. T.,
& Courtney,
W. T. (2014)
3. Bolyard, J. J.,
& MoyerPackenham, P.
S. (2012)
4. Carbonneau,
K., Marley, S.,
&. Selig, J.
(2012)
5. Carr, J. J.
(2012)
6. Dunleavy, M.,
& Heinecke,
W. F. (2008)
7. Jackson, A. T.,
Brummel, B.
J., Pollet, C. L.,
& Greer, D. D.
(2013)
8. MoyerPackenham, P.
S. & Suh, J. M.
(2012)
9. Reimer, K., &
Moyer, P. S.
(2005)
10. Tatar, E.,
Zengin, Y., &
Kagizmanli, T.
B. (2015)
11. Watts, C. M.,
MoyerPackenham, P.
S., Tucker, S.
I., Bullock, E.
P., Shumway,
J. F.,
Literature Review Matrix
Research
Research
Method/
Question/Purpose Design/Methodology Sample
Findings
Theoretical
Framework
Westenskow,
A., ... &
Jordan, K.
(2016)
12. Wilkins, J.
(2008)
Given 12 research studies, complete the literature review matrix below. Include the research question,
purpose, theoretical framework, research design, methodology, method, sample, and findings. Most of
this information can be found in the abstract.
Research Study
1.
Brodie, K.
(2011)
2. Bouck, E. C.,
Satsangi, R.,
Doughty, T. T.,
& Courtney,
W. T. (2014)
3. Bolyard, J. J.,
& MoyerPackenham, P.
S. (2012)
4. Carbonneau,
K., Marley, S.,
&. Selig, J.
(2012)
5. Carr, J. J.
(2012)
6. Dunleavy, M.,
& Heinecke,
W. F. (2008)
7. Jackson, A. T.,
Brummel, B.
J., Pollet, C. L.,
& Greer, D. D.
(2013)
8. MoyerPackenham, P.
S. & Suh, J. M.
(2012)
9. Reimer, K., &
Moyer, P. S.
(2005)
10. Tatar, E.,
Zengin, Y., &
Kagizmanli, T.
B. (2015)
11. Watts, C. M.,
MoyerPackenham, P.
S., Tucker, S.
I., Bullock, E.
P., Shumway,
J. F.,
Literature Review Matrix
Research
Research
Method/
Question/Purpose Design/Methodology Sample
Findings
Theoretical
Framework
Westenskow,
A., ... &
Jordan, K.
(2016)
12. Wilkins, J.
(2008)
References
Brodie, K. (2011). Working with learners’ mathematical thinking: Towards a language of description for
changing pedagogy. Teaching & Teacher Education, 27(1), 174- 186.
doi:10.1016/j.tate.2010.07.014
Bouck, E. C., Satsangi, R., Doughty, T. T., & Courtney, W. T. (2014). Virtual and concrete
manipulatives: A comparison of approaches for solving mathematics problems for
students with autism spectrum disorder. Journal of Autism and Developmental
Disorders, 44(1), 180-193.
Bolyard, J. J., & Moyer-Packenham, P. S. (2012). Making sense of integer arithmetic: The effect of using
virtual manipulatives on students’ representational fluency. Journal of Computers in Mathematics
& Science Teaching, 31(2), 93-113.
Burns, B. A., & Hamm, E. M. (2011). A comparison of concrete and virtual manipulative use in thirdand fourth-grade mathematics. School Science & Mathematics, 111, 256-261.
doi:10.1111/j.1949-8594.2011.00086.x
Carbonneau, K., Marley, S., &. Selig, J. (2012). A meta-analysis of the efficacy of teaching mathematics
with concrete manipulatives. Journal of Educational Psychology, 105(2), 380–400.
Carr, J. J. (2012). Does math achievement h'APP'en when iPads and game-based learning are
incorporated into fifth-grade mathematics instruction?. Journal of Information Technology
Education, 1(1), 269-286.
Dunleavy, M., & Heinecke, W. F. (2008). The impact of 1:1 laptop use on middle school
math and science standardized test scores. Computers in The Schools, 24(3-4), 7-22.
Jackson, A. T., Brummel, B. J., Pollet, C. L., & Greer, D. D. (2013). An evaluation of interactive
tabletops in elementary mathematics education. Educational Technology Research and
Development, 61(2), 311-332.
Moyer-Packenham, P. S. & Suh, J. M. (2012). Learning mathematics with technology: The influence of
virtual manipulatives on different achievement groups. Journal of Computers in Mathematics and
Science Teaching, 31, 39-59.
Reimer, K., & Moyer, P. S. (2005). Third graders learn about fractions using virtual manipulatives: A
classroom study. Journal of Computers in Mathematics and Science Teaching, 24(1), 5-25.
Tatar, E., Zengin, Y., & Kagizmanli, T. B. (2015). What is the relationship between technology
mathematics teaching anxiety?. Journal of Educational Technology & Society, 18(1),
and
67.
Watts, C. M., Moyer-Packenham, P. S., Tucker, S. I., Bullock, E. P., Shumway, J. F., Westenskow, A., ...
& Jordan, K. (2016). An examination of children's learning progression shifts while using touch
screen virtual manipulative mathematics apps. Computers in Human Behavior, 64, 814-828.
Wilkins, J. (2008). The relationship among elementary teachers' content knowledge, attitudes, beliefs, and
practices. Journal of Mathematics Teacher Education, 11(2), 139- 164.
Ysseldyke, J., Tardrew, S., Betts, J., Thill, T., & Hannigan, E. (2004). Use of an instructional
management system to enhance math instruction for gifted and talented students. Journal for the
Education of Gifted, 27(4), 293-310.
Purchase answer to see full
attachment