Given 12 research studies, complete the literature review matrix from the abstract.

User Generated

grnpuvat

Writing

Description

Given 12 research studies, complete the literature review matrix below. Include the research question, purpose, theoretical framework, research design, methodology, method, sample, and findings. Most of this information can be found in the abstract.

Unformatted Attachment Preview

Given 12 research studies, complete the literature review matrix below. Include the research question, purpose, theoretical framework, research design, methodology, method, sample, and findings. Most of this information can be found in the abstract. Research Study 1. Brodie, K. (2011) 2. Bouck, E. C., Satsangi, R., Doughty, T. T., & Courtney, W. T. (2014) 3. Bolyard, J. J., & MoyerPackenham, P. S. (2012) 4. Carbonneau, K., Marley, S., &. Selig, J. (2012) 5. Carr, J. J. (2012) 6. Dunleavy, M., & Heinecke, W. F. (2008) 7. Jackson, A. T., Brummel, B. J., Pollet, C. L., & Greer, D. D. (2013) 8. MoyerPackenham, P. S. & Suh, J. M. (2012) 9. Reimer, K., & Moyer, P. S. (2005) 10. Tatar, E., Zengin, Y., & Kagizmanli, T. B. (2015) 11. Watts, C. M., MoyerPackenham, P. S., Tucker, S. I., Bullock, E. P., Shumway, J. F., Literature Review Matrix Research Research Method/ Question/Purpose Design/Methodology Sample Findings Theoretical Framework Westenskow, A., ... & Jordan, K. (2016) 12. Wilkins, J. (2008) Given 12 research studies, complete the literature review matrix below. Include the research question, purpose, theoretical framework, research design, methodology, method, sample, and findings. Most of this information can be found in the abstract. Research Study 1. Brodie, K. (2011) 2. Bouck, E. C., Satsangi, R., Doughty, T. T., & Courtney, W. T. (2014) 3. Bolyard, J. J., & MoyerPackenham, P. S. (2012) 4. Carbonneau, K., Marley, S., &. Selig, J. (2012) 5. Carr, J. J. (2012) 6. Dunleavy, M., & Heinecke, W. F. (2008) 7. Jackson, A. T., Brummel, B. J., Pollet, C. L., & Greer, D. D. (2013) 8. MoyerPackenham, P. S. & Suh, J. M. (2012) 9. Reimer, K., & Moyer, P. S. (2005) 10. Tatar, E., Zengin, Y., & Kagizmanli, T. B. (2015) 11. Watts, C. M., MoyerPackenham, P. S., Tucker, S. I., Bullock, E. P., Shumway, J. F., Literature Review Matrix Research Research Method/ Question/Purpose Design/Methodology Sample Findings Theoretical Framework Westenskow, A., ... & Jordan, K. (2016) 12. Wilkins, J. (2008) References Brodie, K. (2011). Working with learners’ mathematical thinking: Towards a language of description for changing pedagogy. Teaching & Teacher Education, 27(1), 174- 186. doi:10.1016/j.tate.2010.07.014 Bouck, E. C., Satsangi, R., Doughty, T. T., & Courtney, W. T. (2014). Virtual and concrete manipulatives: A comparison of approaches for solving mathematics problems for students with autism spectrum disorder. Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders, 44(1), 180-193. Bolyard, J. J., & Moyer-Packenham, P. S. (2012). Making sense of integer arithmetic: The effect of using virtual manipulatives on students’ representational fluency. Journal of Computers in Mathematics & Science Teaching, 31(2), 93-113. Burns, B. A., & Hamm, E. M. (2011). A comparison of concrete and virtual manipulative use in thirdand fourth-grade mathematics. School Science & Mathematics, 111, 256-261. doi:10.1111/j.1949-8594.2011.00086.x Carbonneau, K., Marley, S., &. Selig, J. (2012). A meta-analysis of the efficacy of teaching mathematics with concrete manipulatives. Journal of Educational Psychology, 105(2), 380–400. Carr, J. J. (2012). Does math achievement h'APP'en when iPads and game-based learning are incorporated into fifth-grade mathematics instruction?. Journal of Information Technology Education, 1(1), 269-286. Dunleavy, M., & Heinecke, W. F. (2008). The impact of 1:1 laptop use on middle school math and science standardized test scores. Computers in The Schools, 24(3-4), 7-22. Jackson, A. T., Brummel, B. J., Pollet, C. L., & Greer, D. D. (2013). An evaluation of interactive tabletops in elementary mathematics education. Educational Technology Research and Development, 61(2), 311-332. Moyer-Packenham, P. S. & Suh, J. M. (2012). Learning mathematics with technology: The influence of virtual manipulatives on different achievement groups. Journal of Computers in Mathematics and Science Teaching, 31, 39-59. Reimer, K., & Moyer, P. S. (2005). Third graders learn about fractions using virtual manipulatives: A classroom study. Journal of Computers in Mathematics and Science Teaching, 24(1), 5-25. Tatar, E., Zengin, Y., & Kagizmanli, T. B. (2015). What is the relationship between technology mathematics teaching anxiety?. Journal of Educational Technology & Society, 18(1), and 67. Watts, C. M., Moyer-Packenham, P. S., Tucker, S. I., Bullock, E. P., Shumway, J. F., Westenskow, A., ... & Jordan, K. (2016). An examination of children's learning progression shifts while using touch screen virtual manipulative mathematics apps. Computers in Human Behavior, 64, 814-828. Wilkins, J. (2008). The relationship among elementary teachers' content knowledge, attitudes, beliefs, and practices. Journal of Mathematics Teacher Education, 11(2), 139- 164. Ysseldyke, J., Tardrew, S., Betts, J., Thill, T., & Hannigan, E. (2004). Use of an instructional management system to enhance math instruction for gifted and talented students. Journal for the Education of Gifted, 27(4), 293-310.
Purchase answer to see full attachment
User generated content is uploaded by users for the purposes of learning and should be used following Studypool's honor code & terms of service.

Explanation & Answer

...


Anonymous
Great study resource, helped me a lot.

Studypool
4.7
Trustpilot
4.5
Sitejabber
4.4

Similar Content

Related Tags