Description
Lesson Summary
Attached are my two prior assignments so you know what I chose, etc.
In this lesson, you reviewed the selection process and examination of resources. Now, you will put these skills to use in order to support your informative/explanatory paper.
You will evaluate the landmark case you chose in connection with your topic. As you evaluate, you will make notes using the Landmark Case Evaluation notes. If it wont open I copied it below.
Your Response Log and Response Questions will be graded according to the rubric. Use this rubric as a self-check before you submit your work.
Landmark Case Evaluation
Fill in the notes for the landmark case you selected to connect with your topic in the previous lessons. You may use the official court documents for the case and articles written about the case to fill in the required information below.
Important note: Be sure to paraphrase your research by writing your responses in your own words.
| Basic Information |
|---|
Title of landmark case(including case number):
Plaintiff:
Defendant:
Date case argued and decided:
Judgment Affirmed or Reversed:
| Case Evaluation |
|---|
Write three to five complete sentences to respond to each of the following items.
Issue/charges being discussed:
Evidence presented during the arguments:
Conclusions of the judge/judges:
Connection with amendment/personal freedom topic for your informative/explanatory article:
Unformatted Attachment Preview
Purchase answer to see full attachment
Explanation & Answer
Kindly let me know if you need any clarification.
Running head: LANDMARK CASE
Landmark Case
Name
Institution
LANDMARK CASE
2
Basic Information
Title of landmark case (including case number): Mapp v. Ohio, 367 U.S. 643; 6 L. Ed. 2d 1081;
81 S. Ct. 1684 (1961)
Plaintiff: Ohio, United States Supreme Court
Defendant: Mapp
Date case argued and decided: 1961
Judgment Affirmed or Reversed: The judgment was reversed
Case Evaluation
Issue/Charges being Discussed
A close observation of the case provides that police officers entered the house of Dollree
Mapp so as to search for someone was needed for questioning concerning recent bomb. The
police entered the house without the permission or search warrant (4th Amendment Supreme
Court Cases, n.d). While searching the house, the police officers came across obscene pictures,
books, as well as photographs after which the accused or defendant was eventually co...
Review
Review
