Accounting System(s) in a germany Country.

User Generated

yd520gmu

Business Finance

Description

my group topic is germany

Topics to include about the country should/may include, but is not limited to, the following:

  • History of accounting in the country
  • Cultural differences (from Canadian culture) affecting accounting and accounting systems.
  • Political environment and legal system and differences (from Canadian culture) affecting accounting and accounting systems
  • Standard setting bodies
  • Types of business entities and the information needs of various users of the financial information
  • Different accounting systems used by different types of business organizations (eg. Multinational corporation, privately held corporation, non-consolidated entity, partnership)
  • Presentation options of financial information (eg. Balance sheets, income statement formats)
  • Differences from IFRS if applicable
  • Political effect on accounting standards
  • Accounting profession
  • Examples of financial statements from selected company highlighting unique accounting differences from Canadian GAAP.

and leture in the files

Unformatted Attachment Preview

Accounting 3357 International Accounting Group Lecture/Report Assignment Summer I, 2018 Instuctions Each group will be required to lecture, and prepare a report, on the following topic: Accounting System(s) in a Foreign Country. Each group will select a country of choice. The following countries are recommended because the textbook contains excellent information about these countries: Australia, China, France, Germany, Japan, United Kingdom, U.S.A. (Canada cannot be chosen.) Countries will be assigned to groups on a ‘first-come, first-serve’ basis The lecture will be approximately 35-40 minutes. The format of the lecture is totally at the discretion of the group. Groups can use ‘powerpoints’, the whiteboard, or simply students’ lecture skills. Topics to include about the country should/may include, but is not limited to, the following: • • • • • • • • • • • History of accounting in the country Cultural differences (from Canadian culture) affecting accounting and accounting systems. Political environment and legal system and differences (from Canadian culture) affecting accounting and accounting systems Standard setting bodies Types of business entities and the information needs of various users of the financial information Different accounting systems used by different types of business organizations (eg. Multinational corporation, privately held corporation, non-consolidated entity, partnership) Presentation options of financial information (eg. Balance sheets, income statement formats) Differences from IFRS if applicable Political effect on accounting standards Accounting profession Examples of financial statements from selected company highlighting unique accounting differences from Canadian GAAP. A file has been included in Brightspace containing a list of pages in the text referring to specific selected countries. This list may help the group locate material about their selected country. The instructor will announce to the groups the dates that they will be expected to give the lecture. Also, again note that a report will be submitted on the day of the lecture. The report will be graded on, among other considerations, content, professionalism, personal interpretations of the information provided, grammar, and organization. The report should be typed, and no more than 10 typed pages. Grades will not be given for the length of the report. If a group can submit a well-presented report of only three pages, for example, then they can expect a good grade. WHEN DETERMINING THE GRADE FOR THE REPORT, POINTS WILL BE DEDUCTED IF STUDENTS SIMPLY READ FROM A SCRIPT DURING THE LECTURE. Now in its tenth edition, Comparative International Accounting by Nobes and Parker is renowned for its depth of discussion and comprehensive coverage of the international dimensions of financial accounting and reporting. Comparative International Accounting has been extensively revised for the many changes in international accounting since the last edition. New to this edition are: An additional chapter on how the practice of IFRS • can vary within a country and between countries Updated case studies and an increased number of • real-world examples New information on pension accounting, auditing • standards and IFRS 8 Increased coverage of China and of small and • medium enterprises (SMEs) • Contributions from a diverse group of international practitioners and academics, which are updated every two years to incorporate the latest developments in the field Christopher Nobes is Professor of Accounting at Royal Holloway, University of London. From 1993 to 2001 he was a representative on the board of the International Accounting Standards Committee. Robert Parker is Emeritus Professor of Accounting at the University of Exeter, UK. He was formerly editor of the journal, Accounting and Business Research. Both authors have received the American Accounting Association’s award of ‘outstanding international accounting educator’. Revised resources for lecturers are available to download at www.pearsoned.co.uk/nobes. an imprint of CVR_NOBE4767_10_SE_CVR.indd 1 Front cover image: © Getty Images/Iconica Comparative International Accounting It uncovers the conceptual and contextual foundations of the increasingly used International Financial Reporting Standards (IFRS) and contrasts them with US generally accepted accounting principles (GAAP). Nobes and Parker examine the key issues inherent in the subject, such as transition, harmonization and political lobbying, and the international differences that remain. They also look at the special accounting problems of multinational companies. Tenth Edition Christopher Nobes and Robert Parker Comparative International Accounting Tenth Edition Nobes Parker www.pearson-books.com 25/3/08 14:50:00 CIA_A01.qxd 12/14/08 11:15 AM Page i COMPARATIVE INTERNATIONAL ACCOUNTING .. CIA_A01.qxd 12/14/08 11:15 AM Page ii We work with leading authors to develop the strongest educational materials in business and finance, bringing cutting-edge thinking and best learning practice to a global market Under a range of well-known imprints, including Financial Times Prentice Hall, we craft high quality print and electronic publications which help readers to understand and apply their content, whether studying or at work To find out more about the complete range of our publishing, please visit us on the World Wide Web at: www.pearsoned.co.uk .. CIA_A01.qxd 12/14/08 11:15 AM Page iii Tenth Edition COMPARATIVE INTERNATIONAL ACCOUNTING Christopher Nobes and Robert Parker .. CIA_A01.qxd 12/14/08 11:15 AM Page iv Pearson Education Limited Edinburgh Gate Harlow Essex CM20 2JE England and Associated Companies throughout the world Visit us on the World Wide Web at: www.pearsoned.co.uk First edition published in Great Britain under the Philip Allan imprint 1981 Second edition published 1985 Third edition published under the Prentice Hall imprint 1991 Fourth edition published 1995 Fifth edition published under the Prentice Hall imprint 1998 Sixth edition published 2000 Seventh edition published 2002 Eighth edition published 2004 Ninth edition published 2006 Tenth edition published 2008 © Prentice Hall Europe 1991, 1995, 1998 © Pearson Education Limited 2000, 2002, 2004, 2006, 2008 Chapter 18 © John Flower 2002, 2004, 2006, 2008 The rights of Christopher Nobes and Robert Parker to be identified as authors of this work have been asserted by them in accordance with the Copyright, Designs and Patents Act 1988. All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be reproduced, stored in a retrieval system, or transmitted in any form or by any means, electronic, mechanical, photocopying, recording or otherwise, without either the prior written permission of the publisher or a licence permitting restricted copying in the United Kingdom issued by the Copyright Licensing Agency Ltd, 6–10 Kirby Street, London EC1N 8TS. ISBN: 978-0-273-71476-7 British Library Cataloguing-in-Publication Data A catalogue record for this book is available from the British Library Library of Congress Cataloging-in-Publication Data Comparative international accounting / [edited by] Christopher Nobes and Robert Parker. – 10th ed. p. cm. Includes bibliographical references and index. ISBN-13: 978-0-273-71476-7 (alk. paper) 1. Comparative accounting. I. Nobes, Christopher. II. Parker, R. H. (Robert Henry) HF5625.C74 2008 657— dc22 2008007524 10 9 8 7 6 5 12 11 10 09 4 3 2 Typeset in 9.5/12.5pt Stone Serif by 35 Printed by Ashford Colour Press Ltd., Gosport The publisher’s policy is to use paper manufactured from sustainable forests. .. CIA_A01.qxd 12/14/08 11:15 AM Page v Brief contents Contributors Preface xvi xviii Part I SETTING THE SCENE 1 2 3 4 Introduction Causes and examples of international differences International classification of financial reporting International harmonization 3 24 51 74 Part II FINANCIAL REPORTING BY LISTED GROUPS 5 6 7 8 9 10 The context of financial reporting by listed groups The requirements of International Financial Reporting Standards Different versions of IFRS practice Financial reporting in the United States Enforcement of Financial Reporting Standards Political lobbying on Accounting Standards – US, UK and international experience 101 117 145 157 189 206 Part III HARMONIZATION AND TRANSITION IN EUROPE AND EAST ASIA 11 12 Harmonization and transition in Europe Harmonization and transition in East Asia 237 257 Part IV FINANCIAL REPORTING BY INDIVIDUAL COMPANIES 13 14 15 The context of financial reporting by individual companies Making accounting rules for non-listed business enterprises in Europe Accounting rules and practices of individual companies in Europe 285 293 314 Part V MAJOR ISSUES IN FINANCIAL REPORTING BY MNEs 16 Key financial reporting topics 343 v .. CIA_A01.qxd 12/14/08 11:15 AM Page vi Brief contents 17 18 19 Consolidation Foreign currency translation Segment reporting 368 384 427 Part VI ANALYSIS AND MANAGEMENT ISSUES 20 21 22 23 International financial analysis International auditing International aspects of corporate income taxes Managerial accounting Glossary of abbreviations Suggested answers to some of the end-of-chapter questions Author index Subject index 457 481 510 531 558 563 583 587 Supporting resources Visit www.pearsoned.co.uk/nobes to find valuable online resources For instructors I Complete, downloadable Instructor’s Manual, Convenience. Simplicity. Success. including answers to the end of chapter questions in the text, additional questions for further study and multiple choice questions (with answers). I PowerPoint slides of the figures and tables in the book that can be downloaded and used as OHTs For more information please contact your local Pearson Education sales representative or visit www.pearsoned.co.uk/nobes. vi .. CIA_A01.qxd 12/14/08 11:15 AM Page vii Contents Contributors xvi xviii Preface Part I SETTING THE SCENE 1 Introduction Contents Objectives 1.1 1.2 1.3 1.4 1.5 Differences in financial reporting The global environment of accounting The nature and growth of MNEs Comparative and international aspects of accounting Structure of this book Summary References Useful websites Questions 2 Causes and examples of international differences 3 3 3 4 5 12 15 18 21 21 22 22 24 Contents Objectives 24 24 2.1 2.2 2.3 2.4 2.5 2.6 2.7 2.8 2.9 25 25 28 29 33 35 36 37 38 Introduction Culture Legal systems Providers of finance Taxation Other external influences The profession Conclusion on the causes of international differences Some examples of differences Summary References Questions 46 47 50 vii .. CIA_A01.qxd 12/14/08 11:15 AM Page viii Contents 3 International classification of financial reporting 51 Contents Objectives 51 52 3.1 3.2 3.3 3.4 3.5 3.6 3.7 3.8 3.9 3.10 52 53 53 55 56 60 66 67 69 69 Introduction The nature of classification Classifications by social scientists Classifications in accounting Extrinsic classifications Intrinsic classifications: 1970s and 1980s Developments related to the Nobes classification Further intrinsic classification Is there an Anglo-Saxon group? A taxonomy of accounting classifications Summary References Questions 4 International harmonization 70 71 73 74 Contents Objectives 74 74 4.1 4.2 4.3 4.4 4.5 75 76 78 87 91 Introduction Reasons for, obstacles to and measurement of harmonization The International Accounting Standards Committee Other international bodies The International Accounting Standards Board Summary References Useful websites Questions 94 95 97 98 Part II FINANCIAL REPORTING BY LISTED GROUPS 5 The context of financial reporting by listed groups 101 Contents Objectives 101 101 5.1 5.2 5.3 5.4 5.5 5.6 101 102 105 106 108 110 Introduction IFRS in the EU Adoption of, and convergence with, IFRS Foreign listing and foreign investing Reconciliations from national rules to US GAAP and IFRS High-level IFRS/US differences viii .. CIA_A01.qxd 12/14/08 11:15 AM Page ix Contents 5.7 5.8 Reconciliations from IFRS to US GAAP Convergence of IFRS and US GAAP Summary References Useful websites Questions 6 The requirements of International Financial Reporting Standards 111 113 114 115 116 116 117 Contents Objectives 117 118 6.1 6.2 6.3 6.4 6.5 6.6 118 118 125 128 130 131 Introduction The conceptual framework and some basic standards Assets Liabilities Group accounting Disclosures Summary References Further reading Useful websites Questions Appendix 6.1 An outline of the content of International Financial Reporting Standards 7 Different versions of IFRS practice 132 132 133 133 133 134 145 Contents Objectives 145 145 7.1 7.2 7.3 7.4 145 146 148 154 Introduction Motivations for different IFRS practice Scope for different IFRS practice Conclusion Summary References Questions 8 Financial reporting in the United States 155 155 156 157 Contents Objectives 157 158 8.1 8.2 158 159 Introduction Regulatory framework ix .. CIA_A01.qxd 12/14/08 11:15 AM Page x Contents 8.3 8.4 8.5 8.6 8.7 8.8 8.9 Accounting standard-setters The conceptual framework Contents of annual reports Accounting principles Consolidation Audit Differences from IFRS Summary References Further reading Useful websites Questions 9 Enforcement of Financial Reporting Standards 163 166 169 174 181 183 184 186 186 187 188 188 189 Contents Objectives 189 189 9.1 9.2 9.3 9.4 9.5 189 190 194 195 201 Introduction Modes and models of enforcement United States European Union Australia Summary References Useful websites Questions 10 Political lobbying on Accounting Standards – US, UK and international experience 202 202 204 205 206 Contents Objectives 206 206 10.1 10.2 10.3 10.4 10.5 10.6 10.7 10.8 207 208 210 220 224 228 229 231 Introduction Motivations for political lobbying Political lobbying up to 1990 US political lobbying from 1990 Political lobbying of the IASC/IASB Preparer attempts to control the accounting standard-setter Political lobbying of the FASB’s convergence with the IASB Some concluding remarks Summary References Useful websites Questions 231 232 234 234 x .. CIA_A01.qxd 12/14/08 11:15 AM Page xi Contents Part III HARMONIZATION AND TRANSITION IN EUROPE AND EAST ASIA 11 Harmonization and transition in Europe 237 Contents Objectives 237 237 11.1 Introduction 11.2 Harmonization within the European Union 11.3 Transition in Central and Eastern Europe 238 238 244 Summary References Useful websites Questions 253 253 256 256 12 Harmonization and transition in East Asia 257 Contents Objectives 257 257 12.1 Introduction 12.2 Japan 12.3 China 258 258 272 Summary References Further reading Useful websites Questions Appendix 12.1 ASBE Standards 277 278 280 280 280 282 Part IV FINANCIAL REPORTING BY INDIVIDUAL COMPANIES 13 The context of financial reporting by individual companies 285 Contents Objectives 285 285 13.1 Introduction 13.2 Outline of differences between national rules and IFRS or US GAAP 13.3 The survival of national rules 13.4 Financial reporting, tax and distribution 13.5 Special rules for small or unlisted companies 285 Summary References 292 292 286 286 289 290 xi .. CIA_A01.qxd 12/14/08 11:15 AM Page xii Contents Useful websites Questions 14 Making accounting rules for non-listed business enterprises in Europe 292 292 293 Contents Objectives 293 293 14.1 Introduction 14.2 Who makes accounting rules? 14.3 Which business enterprises are subject to accounting rules? 293 294 303 Summary References Further reading Useful websites Questions Appendix 14.1 Contents of the Plan comptable général Appendix 14.2 Financial accounting chart of accounts 307 308 309 310 311 312 313 15 Accounting rules and practices of individual companies in Europe 314 Contents Objectives 314 314 15.1 15.2 15.3 15.4 314 315 319 324 Introduction France Germany United Kingdom Summary References Further reading Useful websites Questions Appendix 15.1 Formats for French financial statements Appendix 15.2 Formats for German financial statements Appendix 15.3 Formats for British financial statements 326 326 327 327 327 328 333 336 Part V MAJOR ISSUES IN FINANCIAL REPORTING BY MNEs 16 Key financial reporting topics 343 Contents Objectives 343 343 16.1 Introduction 344 xii .. CIA_A01.qxd 12/14/08 11:15 AM Page xiii Contents 16.2 16.3 16.4 16.5 16.6 16.7 16.8 16.9 Recognition of intangible assets Asset measurement Financial instruments Provisions Employee benefits Deferred tax Revenue recognition Comprehensive income Summary References Questions 17 Consolidation 344 345 347 350 354 358 362 364 365 366 366 368 Contents Objectives 368 368 17.1 17.2 17.3 17.4 17.5 17.6 17.7 369 369 370 371 375 376 377 Introduction Rate of adoption The concept of a ‘group’ Harmonization from the 1970s onwards Definitions of group companies Publication requirements and practices Techniques of consolidation Summary References Further reading Questions 18 Foreign currency translation 381 382 382 382 384 Contents Objectives 384 385 18.1 18.2 18.3 18.4 18.5 18.6 18.7 18.8 18.9 18.10 18.11 385 389 395 398 401 406 409 411 413 419 423 Introduction Translation of transactions Introduction to the translation of financial statements The US initiative The temporal method versus the closing rate method FAS 52 IAS 21 Translation of comprehensive income Accounting for translation gains and losses Research findings An alternative to exchange rates? Summary References 423 424 xiii .. CIA_A01.qxd 12/14/08 11:15 AM Page xiv Contents Further reading Questions 19 Segment reporting 425 425 427 Contents Objectives 427 427 19.1 19.2 19.3 19.4 427 432 433 443 What is segment reporting? The need for segment information Disclosure regulations Evidence on the benefits of segment reporting Summary References Questions 450 451 453 Part VI ANALYSIS AND MANAGEMENT ISSUES 20 International financial analysis 457 Contents Objectives 457 457 20.1 20.2 20.3 20.4 20.5 458 458 463 470 474 Introduction Understanding differences in accounting Disclosure practices in international financial reporting Interpreting financial statements Financial analysis and the capital market Summary References Useful websites Questions 21 International auditing 477 478 480 480 481 Contents Objectives 481 481 21.1 21.2 21.3 21.4 482 484 489 495 Introduction Reasons for the internationalization of auditing Promulgating international standards The international audit process Summary References Further reading Useful websites Questions 507 508 508 508 509 xiv .. CIA_A01.qxd 12/14/08 11:15 AM Page xv Contents 22 International aspects of corporate income taxes 510 Contents Objectives 510 510 22.1 22.2 22.3 22.4 22.5 22.6 511 513 517 518 519 525 Introduction Tax bases International tax planning Transfer pricing Tax systems Harmonization Summary References Further reading Useful websites Questions 23 Managerial accounting 527 527 529 529 529 531 Contents Objectives 531 531 23.1 23.2 23.3 23.4 23.5 23.6 23.7 532 533 535 539 540 549 551 Introduction The balanced scorecard as an overview tool Currency and control Variances and foreign exchange Culture and management accounting Control and performance Looking forward Summary References Questions 553 554 557 Glossary of abbreviations 558 Suggested answers to some of the end-of-chapter questions 563 Author index 583 Subject index 587 xv .. CIA_A01.qxd 12/14/08 11:15 AM Page xvi Contributors Co-editor, author of Chapters 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 12, 13, 16 and 22, and co-author of Chapter 17 Christopher Nobes Professor of Accounting at Royal Holloway College, University of London. He has also taught in Australia, Italy, the Netherlands, New Zealand, Scotland, Spain and the United States. He is currently a visiting professor at the Norwegian School of Management. He was the 2002 ‘Outstanding International Accounting Educator’ of the American Accounting Association. He was a member of the Accounting Standards Committee of the United Kingdom and Ireland from 1986 to 1990, and a UK representative on the Board of the International Accounting Standards Committee from 1993 to 2001. He is vice-chairman of the accounting committee of the Fédération des Experts Comptables Européens. Co-editor, author of Chapters 1, 9, 11, 14 and 15, and co-author of Chapter 17 Robert Parker Emeritus Professor of Accounting at the University of Exeter and former professorial fellow of the Institute of Chartered Accountants of Scotland. He has also practised or taught in Nigeria, Australia, France and Scotland and was editor or joint editor of Accounting and Business Research from 1975 to 1993. He was the British Accounting Association’s ‘Distinguished Academic of the Year’ in 1997, and the 2003 ‘Outstanding International Accounting Educator’ of the American Accounting Association. Authors of other chapters Jan Buisman IFRS Senior Technical Partner for PricewaterhouseCoopers in Sweden and partner in the firm’s Global Corporate Reporting Group. He was formerly the Netherlands representative on the International Auditing Practices Committee, and chairman of Royal NIVRA’s Auditing Standards Board. He is now chairman of the Accounting Practices Committee of FAR in Sweden. (Co-author of Chapter 21) John Flower Formerly, Director of the Centre for Research in European Accounting (Brussels), and earlier with the Commission of the European Communities and Professor of Accounting at the University of Bristol. He now lives in Germany. (Chapter 18) Graham Gilmour Senior Manager in the Global Corporate Reporting Group of PricewaterhouseCoopers. (Co-author of Chapter 21) Stuart McLeay Professor of Treasury at the University of Wales, Bangor. Formerly, he worked as a chartered accountant in Germany, France and Italy, and was a financial analyst at the European Investment Bank. Co-editor of the ICAEW European Financial Reporting series. (Chapter 20) xvi .. CIA_A01.qxd 12/14/08 11:15 AM Page xvii Contributors Clare B. Roberts Professor of Accounting at the University of Aberdeen Business School. (Chapter 19) Stephen Salter Associate Professor and Director of the Center for Global Competitiveness at the University of Cincinnati. Formerly, he was a partner at Ernst & Young Management Consultants. (Chapter 23) Stephen A. Zeff Herbert S. Autrey Professor of Accounting at Rice University. (Chapter 10) xvii .. CIA_A01.qxd 12/14/08 11:15 AM Page xviii Preface Purpose Comparative International Accounting is intended to be a comprehensive and coherent text on international financial reporting. It is primarily designed for undergraduate and postgraduate courses in comparative and international aspects of accounting. We believe that a proper understanding requires broad overviews (as in Part I), but that these must be supported by detailed information on real countries and companies (as in Parts II to IV) and across-the-board comparisons of major topics (as in Parts V and VI). This book was first published in 1981. This present edition (the tenth) is a complete updating of the ninth edition which constituted the most extensive revision that we had ever made. One chapter (7) has been added: an examination of the possible motivations and opportunities for different national versions of IFRS practice. A revised manual for teachers and lecturers is available from http://www. pearsoned.co.uk/nobes. It contains several numerical questions and a selection of multiple-choice questions. Suggested answers are provided for all of these and for the questions in the text. In addition, there is now an extensive set of PowerPoint slides. Authors In writing and editing this book, we have tried to gain from the experience of those with local knowledge. This is reflected in the nature of those we thank below for advice and in our list of contributors. For example, the original chapter on North America was co-authored by a Briton who had been assistant research director of the US Financial Accounting Standards Board; his knowledge of US accounting was thus interpreted through and for non-US readers. The amended version is by one of the editors, who has taught in several US universities. This seems the most likely way to highlight differences and to avoid missing important points through overfamiliarity. The chapter on political lobbying has been written by Stephen Zeff, an American who is widely acknowledged as having the best overview of historical and international accounting developments. Other contributors presently live or work in Germany, in Sweden and in the United States. Structure Part I sets the scene for a study of comparative international financial reporting. Many countries are considered simultaneously in the introductory chapter and when examining the causes of the major areas of difference (Chapter 2). It is then xviii .. CIA_A01.qxd 12/14/08 11:15 AM Page xix Preface possible to try to put accounting systems into groups (Chapter 3) and to take the obvious next step by discussing the purposes and progress of international harmonization of accounting (Chapter 4). All this material in Part I can act as preparation for the other parts of the book. Part I can, however, be fully understood only by those who become well-informed about the contents of the rest of the book, and readers should go back later to Part I as a summary of the whole. Part II examines financial reporting by listed groups. In much of the world this means, at least for consolidated statements, using the rules of either the International Accounting Standards Board or the United States. In addition to an overview and chapters on these two ‘systems’ of accounting, Part II also contains a chapter on whether national versions of IFRS exist, one on enforcement of accounting regulations, and one on political lobbying. Part III contains two chapters that examine the processes of harmonization and transition as applied in the EU and East Asia. Part IV concerns the financial reporting of individual companies, where large international differences remain. There are three chapters: context, regulatory styles, and accounting differences. Part V examines, broadly and comparatively, particular major financial reporting topics: key non-consolidation issues, consolidation, foreign currency translation and segment reporting. Part VI considers four issues of international analysis and management: international financial analysis, international auditing, international aspects of corporate income taxes, and managerial accounting. At the end of the book, there is a glossary of abbreviations relevant to international accounting, suggested answers to some chapter questions, and two indexes (by author and by subject). Publisher’s acknowledgements We are grateful to the following for permission to reproduce copyright material: Table 1.4: United Nations Conference on Trade and Development (UNCTAD) (2007) World Investment Report 2007: Transnational Companies, Exractive Industries and Development. Geneva, UNCTAD. Copyright © United Nations 2007; Table 1.8: United Nations Conference on Trade and Development (UNCTAD) (2007) World Investment Report 2007: Transnational Companies, Exractive Industries and Development. Geneva, UNCTAD. Copyright © United Nations 2007; Table 2.3: Source of data: Datastream. Reproduced by kind permission of Jon Tucker and David Bence of Bristol Business School; Figure 3.1: American Accounting Association (1977) Accounting Review, Supplement to Vol. 52, 1977, p. 99. Copyright © 1977 American Accounting Association. Reproduced with permission; Figure 3.2: Puxty, A.G., Willmott, H.C., Cooper, D.J. and Lowe, A.E. (1987) ‘Modes of regulation in advanced capitalism: locating accountancy in four countries’, Accounting, Organizations and Society, Vol. 12, No. 3, p. 283. Reproduced with permission of Elsevier; Table 3.1: Nair, R.D. and Frank, W.G. (1980) ‘The impact of disclosure and measurement practices on international accounting classifications’, Accounting Review, Vol. 55, No. 3, p. 429. Reproduced with permission of the American xix .. CIA_A01.qxd 12/14/08 11:15 AM Page xx Preface Accounting Association; Table 5.3: Adapted from BASF (2005) BASF Annual Report 2004, pp. 92, 93, BASF SA, Ludwigshafen, Germany. Reproduced with permission; Table 5.6: Extracted from the Bayer AG (2007) Bayer AG Annual Report 2006, Bayer AG, Leverkusen, Germany. Reproduced with permission; Table 5.8: Adapted from the Degussa AG (2005) Degussa AG Annual Report 2004, Degussa AG, Düsseldorf, Germany. Reproduced with permission; Tables 7.1, 7.2 and 7.3: Nobes, C.W. (2006) ‘The survival of international differences under IFRS: towards a research agenda’, Accounting and Business Research, Vol. 36, No. 3. Reproduced with permission; Table 8.2: American Institute of Certified Public Accountants (AICPA) (2006) Accounting Trends and Techniques (issued annually). AICPA, Jersey City, New Jersey, p. 133. Copyright © 2006 by the American Institute of Certified Public Accountants, Inc. All rights reserved. Reprinted with permission; Table 8.3: American Institute of Certified Public Accountants (2006) Accounting Trends and Techniques (issued annually). AICPA, Jersey City, New Jersey, p. 295. Copyright © 2006 by the American Institute of Certified Public Accountants, Inc. All rights reserved. Reprinted with permission; Table 8.4: American Institute of Certified Public Accountants (2006) Accounting Trends and Techniques (issued annually). AICPA, Jersey City, New Jersey, p. 273. Copyright © 2006 by the American Institute of Certified Public Accountants, Inc. All rights reserved. Reprinted with permission; Table 8.5: American Institute of Certified Public Accountants (2006) Accounting Trends and Techniques (issued annually). AICPA, Jersey City, New Jersey, p. 278. Copyright © 2006 by the American Institute of Certified Public Accountants, Inc. All rights reserved. Reprinted with permission; Table 8.8: American Institute of Certified Public Accountants (2006) Accounting Trends and Techniques (issued annually). AICPA, Jersey City, New Jersey, p. 153. Copyright © 2006 by the American Institute of Certified Public Accountants, Inc. All rights reserved. Reprinted with permission; Table 13.1: Adapted from BASF (2005) BASF Annual Report 2004, pp. 92, 93, BASF SA, Ludwigshafen, Germany. Reproduced with permission; Table 13.2: Bayer AG (2005) Bayer AG Annual Report 2004, Bayer AG, Leverkusen, Germany, pp. 74–84. Reproduced with permission; Figure 16.2: Adapted from FEE (1995) ‘A classification of non-state pension schemes’ in Survey of Pensions and Other Retirement Benefits in EU and non-EU Countries, Routledge, London. Reproduced with permission of the Taylor & Francis Group, Ltd; Table 19.2: Honda (2007) Honda Annual Report 2006, Honda, Tokyo, Japan, p. 63. Reproduced with permission; Table 20.4: The Volvo Group (2005) The Volvo Group Financial Report, 2004, AB Volvo, Goteborg, Sweden. Reproduced with permission; Table 23.1: Landry, S., Chan, W. and Jalbert, T. (2002) Balanced scorecard for multinationals, Journal of Corporate Accounting and Finance, p. 38. Copyright © 2002 John Wiley & Sons. Reprinted by permission; Table 23.4: Derived from Harrison, G. and McKinnon, J. (1999) ‘Cross-cultural research in management control systems design: A review of the current state’, Accounting, Organizations and Society, Vol. 24, p. 486 where full references to cited papers are given. Reproduced with permission from Elsevier. In some instances we have been unable to trace the owners of copyright material, and we would appreciate any information that would enable us to do so. xx .. CIA_A01.qxd 12/14/08 11:15 AM Page xxi Preface Other acknowledgements In the various editions of this book, we have received great help and much useful advice from many distinguished colleagues in addition to our contributors. We especially thank Sally Aisbitt (deceased); Dr Ataur Rahman Belal, Aston Business School, Aston University; Andrew Brown of Ernst & Young; John Carchrae of the Ontario Securities Commission; Terry Cooke of the University of Exeter; John Denman and Peter Martin of the Canadian Institute of Chartered Accountants; Brigitte Eierle of Regensburg University; Maria Frosig, Niels Brock Copenhagen Business School, Denmark; Michel Glautier of ESSEC; Dr Jing Hui Liu, University of Adelaide, Australia; Horst Kaminski, formerly of the Institut der Wirtschaftsprüfer; Jan Klaassen of the Free University, Amsterdam; Yannick Lemarchand of the University of Nantes; Ken Lemke of the University of Alberta; Klaus Macharzina of the University of Hohenheim; Malcolm Miller and Richard Morris of the University of New South Wales; Geoff Mitchell, formerly of Barclays Bank; Jules Muis of the European Commission; Ng Eng Juan of Nanyang Technological University of Singapore; Graham Peirson of Monash University; Jacques Richard of the University of Paris Dauphine; Alan Richardson of York University, Toronto; Alan Roberts of the University of Rennes; Paul Rutteman, formerly of EFRAG; Etsuo Sawa, formerly of the Japanese Institute of Certified Public Accountants; Hein Schreuder, formerly of the State University of Limburg; Marek Schroeder of the University of Birmingham; Patricia Sucher, formerly of Royal Holloway, University of London; Lorena Tan, formerly of Price Waterhouse, Singapore; Ann Tarca of the University of Western Australia; Peter van der Zanden, formerly of Moret Ernst & Young and the University of Tilburg; Gerald Vergeer of Moret Ernst & Young; and Ruud Vergoossen of Royal NIVRA and the Free University of Amsterdam; Dr Yap Kim Len, HELP University College, Malaysia. We are also grateful for the help of many secretaries over the years. Despite the efforts of all these worthies, errors and obscurities will remain, for which we are culpable jointly and severally. Christopher Nobes Robert Parker Universities of London and Exeter xxi .. CIA_A01.qxd 12/14/08 11:15 AM Page xxii .. CIA_C01.qxd 10/03/2008 16:30 Page 1 Part I SETTING THE SCENE .. CIA_C01.qxd 10/03/2008 16:30 Page 2 .. CIA_C01.qxd 10/03/2008 1 CONTENTS 16:30 Introduction Robert Parker 1.1 1.2 1.3 1.4 1.5 OBJECTIVES Page 3 Differences in financial reporting The global environment of accounting 1.2.1 Accounting and world politics 1.2.2 Economic globalization, international trade and foreign direct investment 1.2.3 Globalization of stock markets 1.2.4 Patterns of share ownership 1.2.5 International monetary system The nature and growth of MNEs Comparative and international aspects of accounting Structure of this book 1.5.1 An outline 1.5.2 Setting the scene (Part I) 1.5.3 Financial reporting by listed groups (Part II) 1.5.4 Harmonization and transition in Europe and East Asia (Part III) 1.5.5 Financial reporting by individual companies (Part IV) 1.5.6 Major issues in financial reporting by MNEs (Part V) 1.5.7 Analysis and management issues (Part VI) Summary References Useful websites Questions After reading this chapter, you should be able to: l explain why international differences in financial reporting persist, in spite of the adoption of international financial reporting standards (IFRS) by the member states of the European Union and some other important countries; l illustrate the ways in which accounting has been influenced by world politics, the growth of international trade and foreign direct investment, the globalization of stock markets, varying patterns of share ownership, and the international monetary system; l outline the nature and growth of multinational enterprises (MNEs); l explain the historical, comparative and harmonization reasons for studying comparative international accounting. 3 .. CIA_C01.qxd Part I 10/03/2008 16:30 Page 4 Setting the scene 1.1 Differences in financial reporting Differences in financial reporting are the norm. If a number of accountants from different countries, or even one country, are given a set of transactions from which to prepare financial statements, they will not produce identical statements. There are several reasons for this. Although all accountants will follow a set of rules, whether implicit or explicit, no set of rules covers every eventuality or is prescriptive to the minutest detail. Thus there is always room for professional judgement, a judgement that will depend in part on the accountants’ environments (e.g. whether or not they see the tax authorities as the main users of the statements). Moreover, the accounting rules themselves may differ not just between countries but also within countries. In particular the rules for company groups may differ from the rules for individual companies. Multinational enterprises (MNEs) which operate as company groups in more than one country may find inter-country differences particularly irksome. Awareness of these differences has led in recent decades to impressive attempts to reduce them, in particular, by the International Accounting Standards Board (IASB), which issues International Financial Reporting Standards (IFRS), and by the European Union (EU), which has issued Directives and Regulations on accounting and financial reporting. The importance of American stock markets has meant that US generally accepted accounting principles (GAAP), the most detailed and best known of all national sets of rules, have greatly influenced rule-making worldwide. The work of all these regulatory agencies has certainly led to a lessening of international differences but, as this book will show, many still remain and some will always remain. An example of the differences that can, and continue, to arise is provided by the record of GlaxoSmithKline (GSK) and its predecessor GlaxoWellcome (GW) since 1995. GW merged with SmithKlineBeecham. It is listed in New York as well as on the London Stock Exchange, and in accordance with requirements of the US Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) provides a reconciliation to US GAAP of its earnings and shareholders’ equity as measured under UK rules (from 2005 onwards under IFRS). The differences as disclosed in Tables 1.1 and 1.2 are startling. Data from other such reconciliations are given later in this book. Not all are as extreme as those of GSK, but it is clear that the differences can be very large and that no easy rule-of-thumb adjustment procedure can be used. One reason for this is that the differences depend not only on the differences between two or more sets of rules, but also on the choices allowed to companies within those rules. The adoption by listed companies within the EU of IFRS from 2005 onwards, and greater convergence between those standards and US GAAP, has reduced, but not removed, these differences. Understanding why there have been differences in financial reporting in the past, why they continue in the present, and will not disappear in the future, is one of the main themes of comparative international accounting. In the next two sections of this chapter we look at the global environment of accounting and financial reporting, and in particular at the nature and growth of multinational enterprises. We then explore in more depth the reasons for studying comparative international accounting. In the last section we explain the structure of the book. 4 .. CIA_C01.qxd 10/03/2008 16:30 Page 5 Chapter 1 Introduction Table 1.1 GlaxoSmithKline reconciliations of earnings to US GAAP 1995 1996 1997 1998 1999 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 UK IFRS US Difference (% change) £m £m £m % 4,816 5,498 296 979 952 1,010 913 (5,228) (143) 503 2,420 2,732 3,336 4,465 −59 −51 −49 − 45 −50 –227 –105 –87 –46 –36 −31 –19 717 1,997 1,850 1,836 1,811 4,106 3,053 3,915 4,484 4,302 Table 1.2 GlaxoSmithKline reconciliations of shareholders’ equity to US GAAP 1995 1996 1997 1998 1999 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 UK IFRS US Difference (% change) £m £m £m % 7,570 9,648 8,168 8,153 7,882 8,007 7,230 44,995 40,107 34,992 34,116 34,042 34,282 34,653 +8,876 +566 +328 +196 +130 +499 +443 + 432 +574 + 475 +353 +259 91 1,225 1,843 2,702 3,142 7,517 7,390 6,581 5,059 5,925 1.2 The global environment of accounting Accounting is a technology which is practised within varying political, economic and social contexts. These have always been international as well as national, but since at least the last quarter of the twentieth century, the globalization of 5 .. CIA_C01.qxd Part I 10/03/2008 16:30 Page 6 Setting the scene accounting rules and practices has become so important that narrowly national views of accounting and financial reporting can no longer be sustained. Of particular contextual importance are: l major political issues, such as the dominance of the United States and the expansion of the European Union; l economic globalization, including the liberalization of, and dramatic increases in, international trade and foreign direct investment; l the emergence of global financial markets; l patterns of share ownership, including the influence of privatization; l changes in the international monetary system; l the growth of multinational enterprises (MNEs). These developments are interrelated and all have affected financial reporting and the transfer of accounting technology from one country to another. They are now examined in turn. 1.2.1 Accounting and world politics Important political events since the end of the Second World War in 1945 have included: the emergence of the United States and the Soviet Union as the world’s two superpowers, followed by the collapse of Soviet power at the end of the 1980s; the break-up of the British and continental European overseas empires; and the creation of the European Union, which has expanded from its original core of six countries to include, among others, the UK and eventually many former communist countries. More detail on the consequences that these events have had for accounting is given in later chapters. The following illustrations may suffice for the moment: l US ideas on accounting and financial reporting have been for many decades, and remain, the most influential in the world. The collapse of the US energy trading company, Enron, in 2001 and the demise of its auditor, Andersen, had repercussions in all major economies. l The development of international accounting standards (at first of little interest in the US) owes more to accountants from former member countries of the British Empire than to any other source. The IASC and its successor are based in London; the driving force behind the foundation of the IASC, Lord Benson, was a British accountant born in South Africa. l Accounting in developing countries is still strongly influenced by the former colonial powers. Former British colonies tend to have Institutes of Chartered Accountants (set up after the independence of these countries, not before), Companies Acts and private sector accounting standard-setting bodies. Former French colonies tend to have detailed governmental instructions, on everything from double entry to published financial statements, that are set out in national accounting plans and commercial codes. l Accounting throughout Europe has been greatly influenced by the harmonization programme of the EU, especially its Directives on accounting and, more 6 .. CIA_C01.qxd 10/03/2008 16:30 Page 7 Chapter 1 Introduction recently, its adoption of IFRS for the consolidated financial statements of listed companies. l 1.2.2 The collapse of communism in Central and Eastern Europe led to a transformation of accounting and auditing in many former communist countries. The reunification of Germany put strains on the German economy such that large German companies needed to raise capital outside Germany and to change their financial reporting in order to be able to do so. Economic globalization, international trade and foreign direct investment A notable feature of the world economy since the Second World War has been the globalization of economic activity. This has meant the spreading round the world not just of goods and services but also of people, technologies and concepts. The number of professionally qualified accountants has greatly increased. Member bodies of the International Federation of Accountants (IFAC) currently have well over two million members. Accountants in all major countries have been exposed to rules, practices and ideas previously alien to them. Much has been written about globalization and from many different and contrasting points of view. One attractive approach is the ‘globalization index’ published annually in the journal Foreign Policy. This attempts to quantify the concept by ranking countries in terms of their degree of globalization. The components of the index are: political engagement (measured, inter alia, by memberships of international organizations); technological connectivity (measured by internet use); personal contact (measured, inter alia, by travel and tourism and telephone traffic); and economic integration (measured, inter alia, by international trade and foreign direct investment). The compilers of the index acknowledge that not everything can be quantified; for example, they do not include cultural exchanges. The ranking of countries varies from year to year but the most globalized countries according to the index are small open economies such as Singapore, Switzerland and Ireland. Small size is not the only factor, however, and the Top 20 typically also include the US, the UK and Germany. A possible inference from the rankings is that measures of globalization are affected by national boundaries. How different would the list be if the EU were one country and/or the states of the US were treated as separate countries? From the point of view of financial reporting, the two most important aspects of globalization are international trade and foreign direct investment (FDI) (i.e. equity interest in a foreign enterprise held with the intention of acquiring control or significant influence). Table 1.3 illustrates one measure of the liberalization and growth of international trade: merchandise exports as a percentage of gross domestic product (GDP). Worldwide, the percentage has more than trebled since the end of the Second World War. The importance of international trade to member states of the EU is particularly apparent; much of this is intra-EU trade. At the regional level, economic integration and freer trade have been encouraged through the EU and through institutions such as the North American Free Trade Area (NAFTA) (the US, Canada and Mexico). The liberalization has also been due to the dismantling of trade barriers through ‘rounds’ of talks under the aegis of the General Agreement on 7 .. CIA_C01.qxd Part I 10/03/2008 16:30 Page 8 Setting the scene Table 1.3 Merchandise exports as a percentage of gross domestic product at 1990 prices (selected countries, 1950–98) France Germany Netherlands United Kingdom Spain United States Mexico Brazil China India Japan World 1950 1973 1998 7.7 6.2 12.2 11.3 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.9 2.6 2.9 2.2 5.5 15.2 23.8 40.7 14.0 5.0 4.9 1.9 2.5 1.5 2.0 7.7 10.5 28.7 38.9 61.2 25.0 23.5 10.1 10.7 5.4 4.9 2.4 13.4 17.2 Source: Maddison, A. (2001) The World Economy: A Millennial Perspective. Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD), Paris. Tariffs and Trade (GATT) and its successor the World Trade Organization (WTO). One area in which trade is insufficiently liberalized is agricultural products, leading to the criticism that liberalization has benefited developed rather than developing countries. For a discussion of both the positive and negative aspects of international trade, see Finn (1996). The importance of foreign direct investment is illustrated in Table 1.4, which ranks the 10 leading MNEs by the size of their foreign assets. It also shows the Table 1.4 World’s top ten non-financial multinationals ranked by foreign assets, 2004 Company Country Industry Foreign Assets (US $bn) General Electric Vodaphone Ford Motor General Motors BP Exxon Mobil Royal Dutch/Shell Toyota Motor Total France Telecom US UK US US UK US NL/UK Japan France France 449 248 180 174 155 135 130 123 97 86 Electrical Telecoms Motors Motors Oil Oil Oil Motors Oil Telecoms % that is foreign of Assets Sales Employees TNI 60 96 59 36 80 69 67 53 86 65 37 85 42 31 81 70 64 60 81 41 46 80 46 35 83 50 84 36 56 40 48 87 49 34 81 63 72 49 74 49 Note: TNI = transnationality index, calculated as an average of the assets, sales and employees percentages. Source: United Nations Conference on Trade and Development (UNCTAD) (2007) World Investment Report 2007: Transnational Companies, Extractive Industries and Development. Geneva, UNCTAD. Copyright © United Nations 2007. Reproduced with permission. 8 .. CIA_C01.qxd 10/03/2008 16:30 Page 9 Chapter 1 Introduction percentages of their assets, sales and employees that are foreign, and a simple transnationality index (TNI), calculated as the average of the percentages. The home countries of these MNEs are the US (4 MNEs), France (2), the UK (2), Japan (1) and the Netherlands/UK (1). The industries represented are electrical equipment, telecommunications, motor vehicles and oil. Two UK companies, Vodafone and BP, have the highest transnationality indices. 1.2.3 Globalization of stock markets At the same time as international trade and FDI have increased, capital markets have become increasingly globalized. This has been made possible by the deregulation of the leading national financial markets (e.g. the ‘Big Bang’ on the London Stock Exchange in 1986); the speed of financial innovation (involving new trading techniques and new financial instruments of sometimes bewildering complexity); dramatic advances in the electronic technology of communications; and growing links between domestic and world financial markets. Table 1.5 lists the countries where there are stock exchanges with more than 250 domestic listed companies and also a market capitalization (excluding investment funds) of more than $800 billion. Table 1.5 Major stock exchanges, April 2007 Market capitalization of domestic equities ($bn) Market capitalization as % of United Kingdom Country Exchange Domestic listed companies Europe and Africa – Germany South Africa Switzerland United Kingdom Euronext Deutsche Börse Johannesburg Swiss exchanges London 956 658 345 256 2,603 2,229 1,022 807 1,342 3,961 56 26 20 34 100 São Paulo Toronto NASDAQ New York 362 3,832 2,788 1,795 845 1,823 4,061 16,112 21 46 102 406 Hong Kong Bombay (Mumbai) Tokyo Korean Australian 1,177 4,826 2,396 1,695 1,777 1,821 932 4,653 905 1,282 46 23 117 23 32 The Americas Brazil Canada United States Asia-Pacific China India Japan Korea Australia Sources: World Federation of Exchanges; Euronext. 9 .. CIA_C01.qxd Part I 10/03/2008 16:30 Page 10 Setting the scene Precise measures of the internationalization of the world’s stock markets are hard to construct. Two crude measures are cross-border listings and the extent to which companies translate their annual reports into other languages for the benefit of foreign investors. For example, French companies are listed on stock exchanges in Australia, Belgium, Canada, Germany, Luxembourg, the Netherlands, Spain, Sweden, Switzerland, the UK and the US (Gélard, 2001, pages 1038–9). Table 1.6 shows the extent of listing by foreign companies on eight of the world’s major stock exchanges. In absolute terms, the largest number of foreign listings is on the New York stock exchange; in percentage terms, Switzerland has the most foreign listings. The lack of foreign listings in Tokyo (the world’s second largest stock exchange) and Toronto is very apparent. Davis et al. (2003) examine the international nature of stock markets from the nineteenth century onwards, and chart the rise in listing requirements on the London, Berlin, Paris and New York exchanges. Some companies publish their annual reports in more than one language. The most important reason for this is the need for large MNEs to raise money and have their shares traded in the US and the UK. This explains why English is the most common secondary reporting language. Other reasons for using more than one language are that the MNE is based in a country with more than one official language, that the MNE has headquarters in more than one country or that it has substantial commercial operations in several countries. For example, the Finnish telecommunications company, Nokia, publishes its annual report and financial statements not only in Finnish and Swedish (the two official languages of Finland) but also in English. The Business Review section of the report is also available in French, German, Italian, Portuguese, Spanish, Chinese and Japanese (Parker, 2001b). The translation of annual reports is further discussed in Chapter 20. Evans (2004) discusses the problems of translating accounting terms from one language to another. A more sophisticated measure of internationalization is the extent to which stock markets have become ‘integrated’, in the sense that securities are priced according to international rather than domestic factors (Wheatley, 1988). Froot and Dabora (1999) show that domestic factors are still important even for such Anglo-Dutch ‘twin’ stocks as Unilever NV/PLC. Table 1.6 Foreign company listings on eight major stock exchanges, April 2007 Euronext (France, Netherlands, Belgium, Portugal) Germany London NASDAQ New York Switzerland Toronto Tokyo No. As % of total listings 246 101 648 326 447 89 54 26 20 13 20 10 20 26 1 1 Source: World Federation of Exchanges. 10 .. CIA_C01.qxd 10/03/2008 16:30 Page 11 Chapter 1 Introduction National stock exchange regulators not only operate in their domestic markets but are also, through the international bodies to which they belong, such as the International Organization of Securities Commissions (IOSCO) and the Committee of European Securities Regulators (CESR), playing increasingly important roles in the internationalization of accounting rules (see Chapters 4 and 11). 1.2.4 Patterns of share ownership The globalization of stock markets does not mean uniformity of investor behaviour around the world. Patterns and trends in share ownership differ markedly from country to country. The nature of the investors in listed companies has implications for styles of financial reporting. The greater the split between the owners and managers of these companies, the greater the need for publicly available and independently audited financial statements. La Porta et al. (1999) distinguish companies whose shares are widely held from those that are family controlled, state controlled, controlled by a widely held financial corporation, or controlled by a widely held non-financial corporation. According to their data, which cover 27 countries (not including China, India and Eastern Europe) in the mid-1990s, 36 per cent of the companies in the world were widely held, 30 per cent were family controlled and 18 per cent were state controlled. The countries whose largest 20 companies were most (60 per cent or more) widely held were, in descending order, the UK, Japan, the US, Australia, Ireland, Canada, France and Switzerland. The countries whose largest 20 companies were most (60 per cent or more) family controlled were Mexico, Hong Kong and Argentina. The countries with companies with most (35 per cent or more) state control were Austria, Singapore, Israel, Italy, Finland and Norway. The countries with companies held 15 per cent or more by a widely-held financial corporation were Belgium, Germany, Portugal and Sweden. More up-to-date data is available from surveys of share ownership. These show different trends in different countries. In the US the percentage of persons investing in shares directly or through mutual funds (known as unit trusts in the UK) rose from 19 per cent in 1983 to 37 per cent in 1992 to 50 per cent in 2002 (Investment Company Institute, 2002). By contrast, in the UK the equivalent percentages were 26 per cent in 1990, 20 per cent in 1998 and 16 per cent in 2002 and 2004. Continuing trends in the UK have been the growth of shareholdings by foreign investors (12 per cent in 1990, 28 per cent in 1998, 33 per cent in 2004) and by financial institutions such as pension funds and insurance companies (33 per cent in 2004, down from a peak of 52 per cent in 1991 as holdings by foreign investors increased) (National Statistics, 2005). Privatization , i.e. the selling-off of state-owned businesses, has greatly expanded the private sector in many countries. In the UK, for example, the privatization of public utilities and other publicly owned enterprises from the 1980s onwards brought several very large organizations within the ambit of company law and accounting standards. In the short run this increased the number of shares held by persons, but many of them later sold out and some companies have deliberately tried to reduce the number of their small shareholders. Privatization has opened companies up to foreign ownership, thus stimulating the growth of FDI, and facilitating their expansion into foreign markets. Privatization has been most dramatic 11 .. CIA_C01.qxd Part I 10/03/2008 16:30 Page 12 Setting the scene in the former communist countries of Central and Eastern Europe. In some cases, notably in Russia, privatization has transferred the ownership of large companies from the state to a small group of so-called ‘oligarchs’. 1.2.5 International monetary system From 1945 to 1972, the international monetary system under the Bretton Woods Agreement was based on fixed exchange rates with periodic devaluations. From 1973, major currencies have floated against each other and exchange rates have been very volatile (as illustrated in Table 18.1). Within the EU, however, most national currencies, with the notable exception of the pound sterling, were replaced by a single currency, the euro, in 1999. Accounting standard-setters have been much concerned with hedging activities and other transactions in foreign currency. There is discussion of these issues in Chapters 16 and 18. 1.3 The nature and growth of MNEs MNEs may be broadly defined as those companies that produce a good or a service in two or more countries. ‘MNE’ is an economic category not a legal one. The size of most MNEs is such that they need to raise external finance and hence to be incorporated companies listed on stock exchanges. As listed companies (i.e. whose shares are publicly traded), their financial reporting is subject to special regulations that are discussed at length in Part II of this book. The existence of MNEs brought a new dimension to areas such as auditing, which already existed at the domestic level (see Chapter 21). Issues such as the translation of the financial statements of foreign subsidiaries for the preparation of consolidated statements (see Chapter 18) are peculiar to multinational companies. Most of the world’s MNEs produce consolidated financial statements in accordance with either US GAAP, IFRS or approximations thereto. The above definition of MNEs is broad enough to include early fourteenthcentury enterprises such as the Gallerani company, a Sienese firm of merchants that had branches in London and elsewhere and whose surviving accounts provide one of the earliest extant examples of double entry (Nobes, 1982). From the late sixteenth century onwards, chartered land and trading companies – notably the English, Dutch and French East India Companies – were early examples of ‘resourceseeking’ MNEs, i.e. those whose object is to gain access to natural resources that are not available in the home country. The origins of the modern MNE are to be found in the period 1870 to 1914, when European people and European investment were exported on a large scale to the rest of the world and when the United States emerged as an industrial power. On the eve of the First World War, the stock of accumulated FDI was greatest in, by order of magnitude, the United Kingdom, the United States, Germany, France and the Netherlands. Two world wars decreased the relative economic importance of European countries and increased that of the United States. Table 1.7 shows how the rankings changed from 1914 to 2005. After the Second World War, the United States became, as it remains, the world’s largest exporter of FDI. More recently, however, European-based multinationals have 12 .. CIA_C01.qxd 10/03/2008 16:30 Page 13 Chapter 1 Introduction Table 1.7 Percentage shares of estimated stock of accumulated foreign direct investment by country of origin, 1914–2005 (%) United Kingdom United States Germany France Netherlands Other Western Europe Japan Rest of world 1914 1938 1980 1990 2000 2005 45 14 14 11 5 5 – 6 100 40 28 1 9 10 3 – 9 100 15 42 8 5 8 9 4 9 100 13 24 8 6 6 16 11 16 100 14 20 8 7 5 22 4 20 100 12 19 9 8 6 17 4 25 100 Sources: Based on Dunning (1992) and UNCTC (2006). regained some of their relative importance and both US and European MNEs were challenged, at least for a time, by those of Japan. All these countries are major recipients of FDI as well as providers of it. MNEs can be classified according to their major activity. Most nineteenth-century and earlier multinationals were ‘resource-seeking’. In the twentieth century other types have developed. Some MNEs are ‘market-seeking’, i.e. they establish subsidiaries whose main function is to produce goods to supply the markets of the countries in which they are located. Other MNEs are ‘efficiency-seeking’, i.e. each subsidiary specializes in a small part of a much wider product range, or in discrete stages in the production of a particular product. Manufacturing MNEs have also developed subsidiaries that specialize in trade and distribution, or in providing services such as insurance, banking or finance. Some MNEs, such as the larger banks and accountancy firms, provide services on a global basis. Improvements in technology have led to the creation of overseas subsidiaries specializing in information transfer. The extent to which the production of goods and services has been internationalized varies between countries and industries. The United States has the world’s highest absolute value of FDI, but the size of its economy is such that investment overseas is relatively less important for the United States than for many European countries, although it is higher in percentage terms than that of Japan (see Table 1.8). Table 1.9 demonstrates the extent to which the headquarters of the largest MNEs are located in the US, Japan and the European Union. Economists and others have sought to explain why MNEs exist. The most favoured explanation is Dunning’s eclectic paradigm, which states that the propensity for firms of a particular country to engage in, or to increase, overseas production is determined by three interrelated conditions. These are the extent to which the enterprises possess, or can gain privileged access to, assets that provide them with a competitive advantage over local firms; the extent to which relative transactions costs make it appropriate for the enterprises to use such advantages themselves rather than to license or franchise them to other firms; and the extent to which relevant costs and government policies push enterprises towards locating 13 .. CIA_C01.qxd Part I 10/03/2008 16:30 Page 14 Setting the scene Table 1.8 Accumulated stock of outward foreign direct investment as percentage of GDP in 2005 (selected countries) Country % Norway Switzerland Belgium Netherlands Sweden United Kingdom France Canada Germany Italy United States Japan World 123 107 104 103 57 56 41 35 35 17 16 9 24 Source: United Nations Conference on Trade and Development (UNCTAD) (2007) World Investment Report 2007: Transnational Companies, Extractive Industries and Development. Geneva, UNCTAD. Copyright © United Nations 2007. Reproduced with permission. Table 1.9 Share of the world’s top 500 MNEs by revenues, 2005 United States France United Kingdom Germany Netherlands Italy Spain Sweden Belgium Finland Denmark UK/Netherlands Belgium/Netherlands Ireland Luxembourg Total EU Japan China Canada Switzerland South Korea Australia India Brazil Mexico Russia Taiwan Norway Other countries (one each) 170 38 38 35 14 10 9 6 4 2 2 1 1 1 1 162 70 20 14 12 12 8 6 4 5 5 3 2 7 500 Source: Fortune Global 500, 2006. 14 .. CIA_C01.qxd 10/03/2008 16:30 Page 15 Chapter 1 Introduction production overseas rather than towards meeting demand by exports from the home country. An important consequence of the growth of multinational enterprise is that much of the world’s trade takes place within firms as well as between countries. The prices at which the transactions take place are internal transfer prices, which are often not the same as open market prices. This has important implications, for taxation, management control, and the relationships between MNEs and their host countries. These matters are considered further in Chapters 22 and 23. The rise of the MNE is one of the main factors responsible for the internationalization of the accountancy profession. Accountancy firms have followed their clients around the world, setting up new offices overseas and/or merging with overseas firms. The audit of MNEs is considered further in Chapter 21. 1.4 Comparative and international aspects of accounting Given the global context set out above, there are clearly strong arguments for studying international accounting. Moreover, there are at least three reasons why a comparative approach is appropriate. First, it serves as a reminder that the US and other Anglo-Saxon1 countries are not the only contributors to accounting as it is practised today. Secondly, it demonstrates that the preparers, users and regulators of financial reports in different countries can learn from each others’ ideas and experiences. Thirdly, it explains why the international harmonization of accounting has been deemed desirable but has proved difficult to achieve (Parker, 1983). These three reasons are now looked at in more detail. Historically, a number of countries have made important contributions to the development of accounting. The Romans had forms of bookkeeping and the calculation of profit, although not double entry. In the Muslim world, while Christian Europe was in the Dark Ages, developments in arithmetic and bookkeeping paved the way for later progress. In the fourteenth and fifteenth centuries, the Italian city states were the leaders in commerce, and therefore in accounting. The ‘Italian method’ of bookkeeping by double entry spread first to the rest of Europe and eventually round the whole world. One lasting result of this dominance is the number of accounting and financial words in English and other languages that are of Italian origin. Some examples in English are bank, capital, cash, debit, credit, folio, imprest and journal. In the nineteenth century, Britain took the lead in accounting matters, to be followed in the twentieth century by the United States. As a result, English has become established as the world’s language of accounting (Parker, 2000 and 2001a). Table 1.10, which gives details of some members of IFAC, shows, inter alia, that the modern accountancy profession developed first in Scotland and England. The table also shows that some countries (e.g. Australia, Canada and the UK) have more 1 This expression is used in this book with its common European meaning, i.e. the UK, the US and other mainly English-speaking countries such as Canada, Australia and New Zealand. 15 .. CIA_C01.qxd 10/03/2008 Part I 16:30 Page 16 Setting the scene Table 1.10 Age and size of some members of IFAC Country Body Founding date∗ Approx. members 2006 (000s) Australia CPA Australia 1952 (1886) 112 Institute of Chartered Accountants in Australia 1928 (1885) 43 Brazil Conselho Federal de Contabilidade 1946 Canada Canadian Institute of Chartered Accountants 1902 (1880) 71 Certified General Accountants Association of Canada (CGAA-Canada) 1913 42 Society of Management Accountants of Canada (CMA-Canada) 1919 37 Chinese Institute of Certified Public Accountants 1988 142+ France Ordre des Experts Comptables 1942 18 Germany Institut der Wirtschaftsprüfer 1932 13 India Institute of Chartered Accountants of India 1949 131 Japan Japanese Institute of Certified Public Accountants 1948 (1927) 17∗∗ Koninklijk Nederlands Instituut van Registeraccountants 1967 (1895) 13 Institute of Chartered Accountants of New Zealand 1909 (1894) 29 Institute of Chartered Accountants in England and Wales 1880 (1870) 128 Institute of Chartered Accountants of Scotland 1951 (1854) 17 Association of Chartered Certified Accountants 1939 (1891) 115 Chartered Institute of Management Accountants 1919 70 Institute of Chartered Accountants in Ireland 1888 13 American Institute of Certified Public Accountants 1887 330 China Netherlands New Zealand United Kingdom and Ireland United States 194 Notes: ∗Dates of earliest predecessor bodies in brackets. The names of some of the bodies have changed from time to time. ∗∗Excluding junior CPAs. 16 .. CIA_C01.qxd 10/03/2008 16:30 Page 17 Chapter 1 Introduction than one important accountancy body. A multiplicity of bodies has been the norm in Anglo-Saxon countries. The largest body is the American Institute of Certified Public Accountants. Table 1.10 does not show rates of growth; the Chinese Institute of Certified Public Accountants has grown in recent years to become the third largest in the world. The table also does not show the extent to which bodies have worldwide and not just national membership. Two UK-based bodies, the ACCA and the CIMA, have been notably active and successful in this regard. A look at the table also suggests that some countries have far more accountants per head of population than others: compare, for example, France (population 60 million; accountants 18,000) and New Zealand (population 4 million; accountants 29,000). Of course, comparisons such as these depend in part on how the term ‘accountant’ is defined in each country. There is further discussion of the accountancy profession in Chapter 2. Table 1.11 demonstrates the overwhelmingly British and American origins of the largest international accountancy firms. Accounting techniques, institutions and concepts have been imported and exported around the world. Britain, for example, has not only imported double entry from Italy and exported professional accountancy to the rest of the world, but has also exported the concept of a true and fair view, first to the other countries of the British Commonwealth and, more recently, to the other member states of the European Union (Parker, 1989; Nobes, 1993). The concepts and practices of management accounting throughout the industrialized world owe much to American initiatives. In the second half of the twentieth century, Japan contributed to management accounting and control. Carnegie and Napier (2002) make a persuasive case for the study of comparative international accounting history. The second reason for taking a comparative approach is that it allows one to learn from both the achievements and failures of others and to avoid the perils of accounting ethnocentrism. It is possible for a country to improve its own accounting by observing how other countries react to problems that, especially in industrialized nations, may not differ markedly from those of the observer’s home country. It is also possible to examine whether, where accounting methods differ, the differences are justified by differences in the economic, legal and social environment and are not merely the accidents of history. Such accidents may not impede harmonization (see Section 2.6), whereas more fundamental differences are likely to be much more difficult to deal with. Table 1.11 Leading international accountancy firms, 2008 Main countries of origin Deloitte UK, USA, Canada, Japan Ernst & Young USA, UK KPMG Netherlands, UK, USA, Germany PricewaterhouseCoopers UK, USA Note: The names given above are those of the international firms. National firms may have different names. 17 .. CIA_C01.qxd Part I 10/03/2008 16:30 Page 18 Setting the scene A feature of recent decades has been the extent to which countries have been willing to adopt and adapt accounting methods and institutions from other countries. Examples will be found in many of the chapters of this book. The UK accepted continental European ideas about greater uniformity in the layout of financial statements. France and Germany accepted US and UK approaches to consolidated statements. The Netherlands accepted a much greater degree of regulation of company accounting and auditing than previously. France and Australia set up their own versions of the US Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC). Germany, where enforcement of accounting standards had been weak, is trying a compromise between the SEC and the UK Financial Reporting Review Panel. Even the US, shaken by accounting scandals from 2001 onwards, is showing itself willing to consider the virtues of the principles approach to accounting standard-setting espoused in the UK and by the IASB. The third reason for taking a comparative approach is better to understand harmonization, a process that has grown steadily in importance since the 1970s. The arguments for and against are considered in Chapter 4. At this point it may be noted that, as is demonstrated in Part V of this book, major problems such as lease accounting, consolidation accounting and foreign currency translation have been tackled in different countries in significantly different ways, although a pattern may sometimes be discerned. Solutions devised by the Financial Accounting Standards Board (FASB) in the US – the world’s most powerful national accounting standardsetting body – have been very influential but have not always been accepted. Indeed, one reason for the acceptance by many countries and companies of international standards is that they are not US GAAP. On the other hand they are sufficiently close to US GAAP to be acceptable to most stock-exchange regulators. The growing strength of the IASB and the adoption of its standards by the EU (in part in order to prevent EU-based MNEs adopting US GAAP) can be seen as a process of regulatory competition (Esty and Geradin, 2001), with the IASB and the FASB competing in a ‘race to the top’. The process of harmonization within the EU meant that all the major countries had their own regulatory solutions challenged and had to accept compromises of both a technical and a political nature. It is clear that any attempt to harmonize financial reporting touches on wider issues than accounting. In Chapter 2 we look at some of the underlying reasons for the differences that exist. Before that, we explain the structure of this book. 1.5 Structure of this book 1.5.1 An outline The book is divided into six parts. Part I sets the context, covering the causes and nature of differences in financial reporting, classification of accounting systems, and an introduction to international harmonization. Part II deals with financial reporting by listed groups, which is dominated worldwide by IFRS and US GAAP and the competition between them. Part III looks at the problems of harmonization 18 .. CIA_C01.qxd 10/03/2008 16:30 Page 19 Chapter 1 Introduction and transition in Europe (both West and East) and in East Asia, with particular reference to Japan and China. Part IV covers the financial reporting (particularly that by individual legal enterprises) that continues to be governed by sets of national rules, some of which differ considerably from IFRS and US GAAP. Part V examines some major technical accounting issues faced by MNEs. Part VI examines some analysis and management issues. The chapters in the six parts of the book are described in more detail below. 1.5.2 Setting the scene (Part I) The adoption of IFRS by the 27 member states of the European Union and the convergence of IFRS and US GAAP, both formally agreed in 2002, have not removed the differences in financial reporting among countries. This is partly because IFRS is used in many countries only for consolidated statements, and partly because different national versions of IFRS practice exist. The causes and nature of these differences are discussed in Chapter 2. Several writers on international accounting have attempted classifications of financial reporting. These are discussed and evaluated in Chapter 3. Most classifications have been of countries, which are explicitly or implicitly assumed to have homogeneous financial reporting. More recently the emphasis has shifted to ‘accounting systems’, in recognition of the fact that countries (and even companies) can use more than one type of accounting. In this book we discuss differences between countries, between systems and between companies. This examination of international differences and patterns in them leads to Chapter 4, which discusses international harmonization, explaining why and how the need for this has grown in recent decades. We particularly look at the extent to which it has been met by the establishment of an International Accounting Standards Committee (IASC) and its successor the International Accounting Standards Board (IASB). 1.5.3 Financial reporting by listed groups (Part II) Chapter 5 follows on from the material of Chapter 4 by exploring the relationship between international and national standards, including ‘competition’ and ‘convergence’ between IFRS and the most influential set of national standards, US GAAP. The requirements of IFRS are summarized in Chapter 6, first in terms of topics (conceptual framework, assets, liabilities, group accounting, disclosures) and secondly in the numerical order of extant standards. Chapter 7 examines the possible motives and opportunities for different national versions of IFRS practice. Chapter 8 describes and analyzes corporate financial reporting and its environment in the US, including a comparison of US rules with international rules. Chapter 9 discusses how the application of IFRS and US GAAP to the financial statements of listed groups is governed and enforced in the US, in leading member states of the EU (UK, France and Germany), and in other important countries such as Australia. The setting and enforcement of accounting rules is in part a political issue, and Chapter 10 therefore examines the politicization of accounting and particularly political lobbying by preparers of financial statements. 19 .. CIA_C01.qxd Part I 10/03/2008 16:30 Page 20 Setting the scene 1.5.4 Harmonization and transition in Europe and East Asia (Part III) Chapter 11 looks at the attempts that have been made to harmonize the great variety of financial reporting that exists within the EU, as part of a more general aim of eliminating economic barriers. The chapter explains the initial difficulties of reconciling Continental European and Anglo-Saxon approaches, and the more recent problems of the accession to the EU of many economies which have had to make a transition from communist to market-based accounting. Chapter 12 compares and contrasts financial reporting in the two major economies of East Asia: Japan and China. Both have been and still are subjected to a variety of outside influences, but both retain their own special national characteristics. 1.5.5 Financial reporting by individual companies (Part IV) Financial reporting by individual business enterprises is much more diverse than that of listed company groups. Chapter 13 explains why this is the case, with special emphasis on the information needs of tax authorities and the determination of distributable profit. Chapter 14 analyzes the different ways of rule-making that have evolved (accounting plans, legal codes, statutes, standards) and assesses their usefulness. Chapter 15 explains how the accounting rules applicable to individual business enterprises may differ from IFRS or US GAAP, with particular reference to France, Germany and the UK. 1.5.6 Major issues in financial reporting by MNEs (Part V) Accounting standards are always in a state of change and those contained within IFRS and US GAAP are no exception. It is never sufficient merely to learn the detailed content of standards at a particular date. All standards are compromises and this is especially so when they have to be agreed at an international level. Chapter 16 examines eight key financial reporting topics: recognition of intangible assets, asset measurement, financial instruments, provisions, employee benefits, deferred tax revenue recognition and comprehensive income. The chapter shows how the valuation rules in the standards do not fit into a consistent conceptual framework and discusses the differences between IFRS and US GAAP from a conceptual perspective. Chapters 17 to 19 examine three problems which relate especially to MNEs: consolidated financial statements, foreign currency translation and segment reporting, with comparisons of the solutions arrived at in IFRS and US GAAP. 1.5.7 Analysis and management issues (Part VI) Chapter 20 examines the problems faced by non-domestic readers and analysts of financial reports, problems that for listed groups have been lessened but not removed by the increasing use of IFRS and US GAAP. Chapter 21 explains how auditing has been internationalized, with particular reference to the role of MNEs, international capital markets, international accounting firms and IFRS. It looks at international standards on auditing (ISAs), the international audit process in practice, and the audit expectations gap in an international context. Chapter 22 discusses international 20 .. CIA_C01.qxd 10/03/2008 16:30 Page 21 Chapter 1 Introduction aspects of corporate income taxes, including the relationship between taxable income and accounting income, international tax planning, tax systems, and the harmonization of taxation. Chapter 23 concludes the book by examining managerial accounting within MNEs, with particular reference to the problems of operating with different currencies and coping with differences in national cultures. SUMMARY References l The scale of international differences in corporate financial reporting remains large, despite the adoption of IFRS for listed companies within the EU and elsewhere. l Financial reporting since the Second World War has taken place within a global context which has been characterized by: vast changes in world politics; dramatic growth in international trade and foreign direct investment (FDI); the globalization of stock markets; varying patterns of share ownership; an unstable international monetary system; and the rise of MNEs, which are the main exporters and importers of FDI and a major factor in the internationalization of the accountancy profession. l Historically several countries have made important contributions to the development of accounting and financial reporting. l The comparison of accounting rules and practices between countries is a strong antidote to accounting ethnocentrism. Successful innovations in one country are being copied in others. l Harmonization is taking place at both regional and international levels. l This book is arranged into six parts: setting the scene; financial reporting by listed groups; harmonization and transition; financial reporting by individual companies; major issues for MNEs; and analysis and management. Carnegie, G.D. and Napier, C.J. (2002) ‘Exploring comparative international accounting history’, Accounting, Auditing & Accountability Journal, Vol. 15, No. 5. Davis, L., Neal, L. and White, E.N. (2003) ‘How it all began: the rise of listing requirements on the London, Berlin, Paris, and New York Stock Exchanges’, International Journal of Accounting, Vol. 38, No. 2. Dunning, J.H. (1992) Multinational Enterprises and the Global Economy, Addison-Wesley, Wokingham. Esty, D.C. and Geradin, D. (eds) (2001) Regulatory Competition and Economic Integration, Oxford University Press, Oxford. Evans, L. (2004) ‘Language, translation and the problem of international accounting communication’, Accounting, Auditing & Accountability Journal, Vol. 17, No. 2. Finn, D. (1996) Just Trading. On the Ethics and Economics of International Trade, Abingdon Press, Nashville. Froot, K.A. and Dabora, E.M. (1999) ‘How are stock prices affected by the location of trade?’ Journal of Financial Economics, August. Gélard, G. (2001) ‘France – Individual Accounts’, in D. Ordelheide, and KPMG, Transnational Accounting, Vol. 2, Palgrave Publishers, Basingstoke. 21 .. CIA_C01.qxd Part I 10/03/2008 16:30 Page 22 Setting the scene Investment Company Institute and the Securities Industry Association (2002) Equity Ownership in America. 2002. Available at www.ici.org/stats. La Porta, R., Lopez-de-Silanes, F. and Shleifer, A. (1999) ‘Corporate ownership around the world’, Journal of Finance, April. Maddison, A. (2001) The World Economy. A Millenial Perspective, OECD. National Statistics (2005) Share Ownership. A Report on Ownership of Shares as at 31st December 2004. Available at www.statistics.gov.uk/StatBase. Nobes, C.W. (1982) ‘The Gallerani account book of 1305–8’, Accounting Review, April. Nobes, C.W. (1993) ‘The true and fair view requirement: impact on and of the Fourth Directive’, Accounting and Business Research, Winter. Parker, R.H. (1983) ‘Some international aspects of accounting’, in S.J. Gray (ed.), International Accounting and Transnational Decision, Butterworths, London. Parker, R.H. (1989) ‘Importing and exporting accounting: the British experience’, in A.G. Hopwood (ed.), International Pressures for Accounting Change, Prentice Hall, London. Parker, R.H. (2000) ‘Why English?’ Accountancy, August. Parker, R.H. (2001a) ‘European languages of account’, European Accounting Review, Vol. 10, No. 1. Parker, R.H. (2001b) ‘Read with care’, Accountancy, June. United Nations Center on Transnational Corporations (UNCTC) (2006) World Investment Report. Wheatley, S. (1988) ‘Some tests of international equity integration’, Journal of Financial Economics, Vol. 21, No. 2. Useful websites Accounting Education www.accountingeducation.com British Accounting Association www.baa.group.shef.ac.uk European Accounting Association www.eaa-online.org International Accounting Standards Board www.iasb.org International Federation of Accountants www.ifac.org United Nations Conference on Trade and Development www.unctad.org World Bank www.worldbank.org World Federation of Exchanges www.world-exchanges.org World Trade Organization www.wto.org QUESTIONS Suggested answers to the asterisked questions are given at the end of the book. 1.1∗ What effects have the major political events in the world since the end of the Second World War had on accounting and financial reporting? 1.2∗ Why have the major accounting firms become ‘international’? From what countries have they mainly originated? Why? 1.3 What major contributions to accounting and its terminology have been made historically by the following countries: Italy, the United Kingdom, the United States, Japan? 22 .. CIA_C01.qxd 10/03/2008 16:30 Page 23 Chapter 1 Introduction 1.4 Which are the top three developed countries in respect of each of: (a) share of the world’s top 500 companies; (b) number of qualified accountants; (c) market capitalization of stock exchange? Why is the answer not the same for all three questions? 1.5 What factors have made possible the ‘internationalization’ of the world’s stock markets? 1.6 What factors have led to the establishment of multinational enterprises? 1.7 Which countries historically have been the home countries of MNEs? Are they the same countries from which international accounting firms have originated? 1.8 Why are there more accountants per head of population in New Zealand than in France? 1.9 Why are some EU companies listed on non-European (especially North American) stock exchanges? 1.10 Why is English the leading language of international corporate financial reporting? 1.11 Access the website of GlaxoSmithKline (www.gsk.com) to explain the differences disclosed in its annual reports between US GAAP and IFRS and UK GAAP from 2004 onwards. Could these differences (summarized in Tables 1.1 and 1.2) have been smaller if the company had made other choices of options available within IFRS and UK GAAP? Are the size of the differences influenced by the fact that GSK is a pharmaceutical company? 23 .. CIA_C02.qxd 10/03/2008 2 16:30 Page 24 Causes and examples of international differences Christopher Nobes CONTENTS OBJECTIVES 2.1 2.2 2.3 2.4 2.5 2.6 2.7 2.8 2.9 Introduction Culture Legal systems Providers of finance Taxation Other external influences The profession Conclusion on the causes of international differences Some examples of differences 2.9.1 Conservatism and accruals 2.9.2 Provisions and reserves 2.9.3 Measurement of assets 2.9.4 Financial statement formats Summary References Further reading Questions After reading this chapter, you should be able to: l discuss the degree to which international cultural differences might explain accounting differences; l outline the two main types of legal system to be found in the Western world and how these are related to accounting differences; l explain how the predominant methods of financing of companies can differ internationally and how this may affect the purpose and nature of accounting; l illustrate the linkages between taxation and financial reporting, and show how these are stronger in some countries than in others; l outline the relationships between international accounting variations and differences in the accountancy profession; l synthesize all the above relationships to begin to explain international differences in financial reporting; l outline various ways in which accounting under German national rules is more conservative than that under UK rules; l explain the difference between a provision and a reserve, and show how the definition of provision is wider in some countries than in others; l outline the main valuation bases used for assets in major countries; l summarize the international differences in formats of financial statements. 24 .. CIA_C02.qxd 10/03/2008 16:30 Page 25 Chapter 2 Causes and examples of international differences 2.1 Introduction That there are major international differences in accounting practices is not obvious to all accountants, let alone to non-accountants. The latter may see accounting as synonymous with double entry, which is indeed similar universally. Much of this book investigates the major differences in accounting. Some examples are given in Section 2.9. As a prelude to this, we try to identify the likely causes of the differences. It is not possible to be sure that the factors discussed below cause them, but a relationship can be established and reasonable deductions made. A large list of possible causes of international differences can be found in the writings of previous researchers (e.g. Choi and Meek, 2005, Chapter 2; Radebaugh, Gray and Black, 2006, Chapter 3). Some researchers have used their estimates of such causes as a means of classifying countries by their accounting systems (see Chapter 3). Other researchers have studied whether perceived differences in accounting practices correlate with perceived causal factors (e.g. Frank, 1979; Doupnik and Salter, 1995). Before going further, it is also important to define ‘accounting’. In this context, we mean published annual financial reporting by companies. To the extent that it is useful to use a term such as ‘accounting system’, we mean the set of financial reporting practices used by a particular company for an annual report. Different companies in a country may use different accounting systems. The same applies to different purposes. For example, in many EU countries, consolidated statements are prepared using IFRS whereas unconsolidated statements use national rules. This chapter investigates why and how national systems differ. However, the ideas here can be used to explain why different countries might exhibit different styles of IFRS practice, as explained further in Chapter 7. Several factors that seem linked to the differences in accounting systems are now examined. These are not necessarily causes of the differences; they might be results, as will be discussed later. 2.2 Culture Clearly, accounting is affected by its environment, including the culture of the country in which it operates. Hofstede (1980) develops a model of culture as the collective programming of the mind that distinguishes the members of one human group from another. Hofstede argues that, much as a computer operating system contains a set of rules that acts as a reference point and a set of constraints to higher-level programs, so culture includes a set of societal values that drives institutional form and practice. As Gray (1988, page 5) notes: societal values are determined by ecological influences and modified by external factors . . . In turn, societal values have institutional consequences in the form of the legal system, political system, nature of capital markets, patterns of corporate ownership and so on. Culture in any country contains the most basic values that an individual may hold. It affects the way that individuals would like their society to be structured and 25 .. CIA_C02.qxd Part I 10/03/2008 16:30 Page 26 Setting the scene how they interact with its substructure. Accounting may be seen as one of those substructures. As Gray (1988, page 5) explains: the value systems or attitudes of accountants may be expected to be related to and derived from societal values with special reference to work related values. Accounting ‘values’ will in turn impact on accounting systems. To get some idea of the basic cultural patterns of various countries, we turn again to Hofstede. Based on a study of over 100,000 IBM employees in 39 countries, Hofstede (1984, pages 83, 84) defined and scored the following four basic dimensions of culture, which can be summarized as follows: 1 Individualism versus collectivism. Individualism stands for a preference for a loosely knit social framework in society wherein individuals are supposed to take care of themselves and their immediate families only. The fundamental issue addressed by this dimension is the degree of interdependence that a society maintains among individuals. 2 Large versus small power distance. Power distance is the extent to which the members of a society accept that power in institutions and organizations is distributed unequally. People in societies that have large power distance accept a hierarchical order in which everybody has a place which needs no further justification. The fundamental issue addressed by this dimension is how society handles inequalities among people when they occur. 3 Strong versus weak uncertainty avoidance. Uncertainty avoidance is the degree to which the members of a society feel uncomfortable with uncertainty and ambiguity. This feeling leads them to beliefs promising certainty and to maintain institutions protecting conformity. Strong uncertainty avoidance societies maintain rigid codes of belief and behaviour and are intolerant towards deviant persons and ideas. Weak uncertainty avoidance societies maintain a more relaxed atmosphere in which practice counts more than principles and deviance is more easily tolerated. A fundamental issue addressed by this dimension is how a society reacts to the fact that time runs only one way and that the future is unknown: whether it tries to control the future or lets it happen. 4 Masculinity versus femininity. Masculinity stands for a preference in society for achievement, heroism, assertiveness and material success. Its opposite, femininity, stands for a preference for relationships, modesty, caring for the weak, and the quality of life. Gray (1988) applies these cultural differences to explain international differences in the behaviour of accountants and therefore in the nature of accounting practices. For example, Gray suggests that a country with high uncertainty avoidance and low individualism will be more likely to exhibit conservative measurement of income and a preference to limit disclosure to those closely involved in the business. Conservatism is examined as an example of international differences later in this chapter. Gray developed the following pairs of contrasting ‘accounting values’: l professionalism versus statutory control; l uniformity versus flexibility; 26 .. CIA_C02.qxd 10/03/2008 16:30 Page 27 Chapter 2 l conservatism versus optimism; l secrecy versus transparency. Causes and examples of international differences The first two relate to authority and enforcement. Here Gray sees a clear contrast between the ‘Anglo’ culture area on the one hand and Asian areas on the other. The second two relate to measurement and disclosure. Gray contrasts the ‘Anglo’ and the Latin and Germanic cultures. This approach may well be particularly useful for examining such issues as international differences in the behaviour of auditors (e.g. Soeters and Schreuder, 1988). However, for financial reporting, the measures of cultural attributes seem vague and indirect, compared with the measurement of directly relevant elements of the external environment of accounting, such as legal systems or equity markets (see below). Also, the cultural data may not be reliable in an accounting context. For example, Hofstede classifies West African countries together, but they have very different legal and accounting systems. Another problem arises from the fact that, for good reasons, Hofstede looked at employees in a large multinational company. When measuring cultural attributes, how does one cope with the fact that many employees of multinationals in Abu Dhabi, Singapore, etc. come from other countries or from particular minority populations? Baskerville (2003) suggests that it is dangerous to equate nation with culture and that there are difficulties in trying to understand a culture by means of numerical indices. However, Hofstede (2003) replies to the criticisms. Salter and Niswander (1995) tried to test Gray’s hypothesis for 29 countries but met considerable difficulty in measuring several of Gray’s ‘accounting values’, so that indirect measures were generally used. For example, the degree of uniformity was partly measured by whether a country has common law or code law, but this is not really a test of differences in accounting practices but a test of a possible cause of them. For a more direct measure of uniformity, Gray’s hypothesis did not hold. For conservatism, some hypothesized relationships held and others did not. The most convincing support for an element of Gray’s hypothesis was that transpare...
Purchase answer to see full attachment
User generated content is uploaded by users for the purposes of learning and should be used following Studypool's honor code & terms of service.

Explanation & Answer

...

Similar Content

Related Tags