Hi,I need someone to complete my accounting exam between 6:30 pm PST to 9:00 pm PST on Tuesday, March 16th. About 25%of the questions will be multiple choice/fill in the blank and the rest will be problem sets, on which showing work is necessary. I will be sending you the questions at 6:40 pm PST onMarch 16thI have attached the syllabus and some mock exams for the course. Please bid only if you can guarantee an A in the exam.

I have attached the below in a Word DOX. as the formating can be lost Critical Thinking Assignment (70 Points)Important! Read FirstChoose one of the following two assignments to complete this week. Do not do both assignments. Identify your assignment choice in the title of your submission.Option #1: Silver Fiddle Construction Case Study You are the president of Silver Fiddle Construction (SFC), which specializes in building high-quality, customized homes in the Grand Junction, Colorado, area. You have just been hired by the Czopeks to build their dream home. You operate as a general contractor and employ only a part-time bookkeeper. You subcontract work to local trade professionals. Housing construction in Grand Junction is booming, and you are tentatively scheduled to complete 11 houses this year. You have promised the Czopeks that the final costs will range from $450,000 to $500,000, and that it will take five months to complete the house once groundbreaking has begun. The Czopeks are willing to have the project delayed in order to save costs.You have just finished a preliminary scope statement for the project (see below). You are now brainstorming potential risks associated with the project.1. Identify potential risks associated with this project. Try to come up with at least five different risks.2. Use a risk assessment form similar to the example in Figure 1 below to analyze identified risks.3. Develop a risk response matrix similar to the example in Figure 2 below to outline how you would deal with each of these risks.PROJECT SCOPE STATEMENTPROJECT OBJECTIVEConstruct a high-quality, custom home within five months at a cost not to exceed $500,000.DELIVERABLESA 2,500-square-foot, 2½-bath, 3-bedroom, finished homeA finished garage, insulated and sheet-rockedKitchen appliances to include range, oven, microwave, and dishwasherHigh-efficiency gas furnace with programmable thermostatMILESTONESPermits approved July 5Foundation poured July 12“Dry in” (including framing, sheathing, plumbing, electrical, and mechanical inspections) passed September 25Final inspection November 7TECHNICAL REQUIREMENTSHome must meet local building codes.All windows and doors must pass NFRC class 40 energy ratings.Exterior wall insulation must meet an “R” factor of 21.Ceiling insulation must meet an “R” factor of 38.Floor insulation must meet an “R” factor of 25.Garage will accommodate two cars and one 28-foot-long Winnebago.Structure must pass seismic stability codes.LIMITS AND EXCLUSIONSThe home will be built to the specifications and design of the original blueprints provided by the customer.Owner is responsible for landscaping.Refrigerator is not included among kitchen appliances.Air conditioning is not included, but the house is prewired for it.SFC reserves the right to contract out services.CUSTOMER REVIEW“Bolo” and Izabella CzopekFigure 1: Risk Event Likelihood Impact Detection Difficulty When Interface problems 4 4 4 Conversion System freezing 2 5 5 Start-up User backlash 4 3 3 Post-installation Hardware malfunctioning 1 5 5 Installation (Source: Larson & Gray, 2017, Figure 7.6, p. 212)Figure 2: Risk Event Response Contingency Plan Trigger Who Is Responsible Interface problems Mitigate: Test prototype Work around until help comes Not solved within 24 hours Nils System freezing Mitigate: Test prototype Reinstall OS Still frozen after one hour Emmylou User backlash Mitigate: Prototype demonstration Increase staff support Call from top management Eddie Equipment malfunctions Mitigate: Select reliable vendor Transfer: Warranty Order replacement Equipment fails Jim (Source: Larson & Gray, 2017, Figure 7.8, p. 217)Be sure to properly organize your writing and include a cover page, an introduction, headings / subheadings for the body of your work, analysis and recommendations, a conclusion, an appendix, and a list of references. Consult this assignment template for a more complete list of requirements: http://csuglobal.libguides.com/ld.php?content_id=21534702 (Links to an external site.).Your paper should be 3-4 pages (900-1200 words) in length (not including the title and references pages) and conform to the CSU-Global Guide to Writing & APA (Links to an external site.). Include at least three scholarly references in addition to the course textbook. The CSU-Global Library is a good place to find these references.Refer to the Critical Thinking Assignment grading rubric below for more information on assignment expectations and grading.ReferenceLarson, E. W. & Gray, C. F. (2018). Case Study 7.2. In Project management the managerial process (5th ed., pp. 255-256). New York, NY: McGraw-Hill Education.Option #2: Peak LAN Case Study Trans Systems is a small information system consulting firm located in Meridian, Louisiana. Trans has just been hired to design and install a Local Area Network (LAN) for the city of Meridian’s social welfare agency. You are the manager for the project, which includes one Trans professional and two interns from a local university. You have just finished a preliminary scope statement for the project (see below). You are now brainstorming potential risks associated with the project.Identify potential risks associated with this project. Try to come up with at least five different risks.Use a risk assessment form similar to the example in Figure 1 below to analyze identified risks.Develop a risk response matrix similar to the example in Figure 2 below to outline how you would deal with each of the risks.PROJECT SCOPE STATEMENTPROJECT OBJECTIVEDesign and install a new Local Area Network (LAN) for the Meridian Social Service Agency within one month, with a budget not to exceed $90,000 and with minimum disruption to ongoing operations.DELIVERABLESTwenty workstations and twenty laptop computersServer with dual-core processorsTwo color laser printersWindows R2 server and workstation operating system (Windows 10)Migration of existing databases and programs to new systemFour hours of introductory training for client’s personnelSixteen hours of training for client network administratorFully operational LAN systemMILESTONESHardware January 22Setting users’ priority and authorization January 26In-house whole network test completed February 1Client site test completed February 2Training completed February 16TECHNICAL REQUIREMENTSWorkstations with 17-inch flat panel monitors, dual-core processors, 4 GB RAM, 8X DVD+RW, wireless card, Ethernet card, and 500 GB hard drive.Laptops with 12-inch display monitor, dual-core processors, 2GB RAM, 8X DVD+RW, wireless card, Ethernet card, 500 GB hard drive, and weighing less than 4½ lbs.Wireless network interface cards and Ethernet connections.System must support Windows 11 platforms.System must provide secure external access for field workers.LIMITS AND EXCLUSIONSOnsite work to be done after 8:00 p.m. and before 7:00 a.m. Monday through Saturday.System maintenance and repair only up to one month after final inspection.Warranties transferred to client.Only responsible for installing software designated by the client two weeks before the start of the project.Client will be billed for additional training beyond that prescribed in the contract.CUSTOMER REVIEWDirector of the City of Meridian’s Social Service AgencyFigure 1: Risk Event Likelihood Impact Detection Difficulty When Interface problems 4 4 4 Conversion System freezing 2 5 5 Start-up User backlash 4 3 3 Post-installation Hardware malfunctioning 1 5 5 Installation (Source: Larson & Gray, 2017, Figure 7.6, p. 212)Figure 2: Risk Event Response Contingency Plan Trigger Who Is Responsible Interface problems Mitigate: Test prototype Work around until help comes Not solved within 24 hours Nils System freezing Mitigate: Test prototype Reinstall OS Still frozen after one hour Emmylou User backlash Mitigate: Prototype demonstration Increase staff support Call from top management Eddie Equipment malfunctions Mitigate: Select reliable vendor Transfer: Warranty Order replacement Equipment fails Jim (Source: Larson & Gray, 2017, Figure 7.8, p. 217)Be sure to properly organize your writing and include a cover page, an introduction, headings / subheadings for the body of your work, analysis and recommendations, a conclusion, an appendix, and a list of references. Consult this assignment template for a more complete list of requirements: http://csuglobal.libguides.com/ld.php?content_id=21534702 (Links to an external site.).Your paper should be 3-4 pages (900-1200 words) in length (not including the title and references pages) and conform to the CSU-Global Guide to Writing & APA (Links to an external site.). Include at least three scholarly references in addition to the course textbook. The CSU-Global Library is a good place to find these references.Refer to the Critical Thinking Assignment grading rubric below for more information on assignment expectations and grading.ReferenceLarson, E. W. & Gray, C. F. (2018). Case Study 7.3. In Project management the managerial process (5th ed., pp. 256-257). New York, NY: McGraw-Hill Education.Rubric PJM410 Mod 3 CT PJM410 Mod 3 CT Criteria Ratings Pts This criterion is linked to a Learning Outcome Requirements 10.0 to >8.0 pts Meets Expectation Includes all of the required components, as specified in the assignment. 8.0 to >6.0 pts Approaches Expectation Includes most of the required components, as specified in the assignment. 6.0 to >4.0 pts Below Expectation Includes some of the required components, as specified in the assignment. 4.0 to >0 pts Limited Evidence Includes few of the required components, as specified in the assignment. 10.0 pts This criterion is linked to a Learning Outcome Content 15.0 to >12.0 pts Meets Expectation Demonstrates strong or adequate knowledge of risk assessment; correctly represents knowledge from the readings and sources. 12.0 to >9.0 pts Approaches Expectation Some significant, but not major, errors or omissions in demonstrating knowledge of risk assessment. 9.0 to >6.0 pts Below Expectation Major errors or omissions in demonstrating knowledge of risk assessment. 6.0 to >0 pts Limited Evidence Fails to demonstrate knowledge of the materials. 15.0 pts This criterion is linked to a Learning Outcome Critical Analysis 20.0 to >16.0 pts Meets Expectation Demonstrates strong critical analysis in creating a risk assessment form and risk response matrix. 16.0 to >12.0 pts Approaches Expectation Some significant, but not major, errors or omissions in analysis and interpretation in creating a risk assessment form and risk response matrix. 12.0 to >8.0 pts Below Expectation Major errors or omissions in analysis and interpretation in creating a risk assessment form and risk response matrix. 8.0 to >0 pts Limited Evidence Fails to provide critical analysis and interpretation of the information given. 20.0 pts This criterion is linked to a Learning Outcome Sources/Examples 5.0 to >4.0 pts Meets Expectation Sources or examples meet required criteria and are well chosen to provide substance and perspectives on the issue under examination. 4.0 to >3.0 pts Approaches Expectation Sources or examples meet required criteria, but are less than adequately chosen to provide substance and perspectives on the issue under examination. 3.0 to >2.0 pts Below Expectation Sources or examples meet required criteria, but are poorly chosen to provide substance and perspectives on the issue under examination. 2.0 to >0 pts Limited Evidence Source or example selection and integration of knowledge from the course are clearly deficient. 5.0 pts This criterion is linked to a Learning Outcome Demonstrates College-level Proficiency in Organization, Grammar, and Style 10.0 to >8.0 pts Meets Expectation Project is clearly organized, well written, and in proper format as outlined in the assignment. Strong sentence and paragraph structure; few errors in grammar and spelling. 8.0 to >6.0 pts Approaches Expectation Project is fairly well organized and written, and is in proper format as outlined in the assignment. Reasonably good sentence and paragraph structure; significant number of errors in grammar and spelling. 6.0 to >4.0 pts Below Expectation Project is poorly organized; does not follow proper format. Inconsistent to inadequate sentence and paragraph development; numerous errors in grammar and spelling. 4.0 to >0 pts Limited Evidence Project is not well organized or written and is not in proper format. Poor quality work; unacceptable in terms of grammar and spelling. 10.0 pts This criterion is linked to a Learning Outcome Demonstrates Proper Use of APA Style 10.0 to >8.0 pts Meets Expectation Project contains proper APA formatting, according to the CSU-Global Guide to Writing & APA, with no more than one significant error. 8.0 to >6.0 pts Approaches Expectation Few errors in APA formatting, according to the CSU-Global Guide to Writing & APA, with no more than two to three significant errors. 6.0 to >4.0 pts Below Expectation Significant errors in APA formatting, according to the CSU-Global Guide to Writing & APA, with four to five significant errors. 4.0 to >0 pts Limited Evidence Numerous errors in APA formatting, according to the CSU-Global Guide to Writing & APA, with more than five significant errors. 10.0 pts Total Points: 70.0