  Explain what your topic is In a summary bullet list, enumerate what you will cover in your presentation  Add slides to cover your topic ▪ Minimum of 10 Powerpoint slides or Prezi transitions ▪ Maximum of 15 Powerpoint slides or Prezi transitions NOTE: If you are doing a Prezi presentation , just modify this slide to show the URL to your Prezi presentation    Add the references you used for your presentation in APA format Wiki is NOT a credible reference At least 5 references are required    Explain what your topic is In a summary bullet list, enumerate what you will cover in your presentation  Add slides to cover your topic ▪ Minimum of 10 Powerpoint slides or Prezi transitions ▪ Maximum of 15 Powerpoint slides or Prezi transitions NOTE: If you are doing a Prezi presentation , just modify this slide to show the URL to your Prezi presentation    Add the references you used for your presentation in APA format Wiki is NOT a credible reference At least 5 references are required Bb Rubric Detail - 30207.201830 - Google Chrome A Secure https://wilmu.blackboard.com/webapps/rubric/do/course/gradeRubric?mode=grid&is Popup=true&rubricCount=1&prefix=_2458125_1&course_id=_453811_1&maxValue=1... Rubric Detail A rubric lists grading criteria that instructors use to evaluate student work. Your instructor linked a rubric to this item and made it available to you. Select Grid View or List View to change the rubric's layout. Exit Name: Ethics topic rubric (paper, mind map, presentation Description: This rubric will be used for grading your paper, mind map, presentation on an ethics topic. It is 100 pt. rubric Grid View List View Unsatisfactory Developing Satisfactory Accomplished Exemplary Scant or incomplete coverage of topic with weak analysis. No use of data to support analysis. Topic coverage. Does paper and presentation defi your topic include topical information on your topic? Does the paper and presentation cover the importance of the topic to individuals, IT professionals, government and business? Minimal coverage of topic with little analysis. Major aspects of topics were poorly addressed and used minimal data and examples. Covers most aspects of the topic. Moderate amount of data presented as a foundation for analysis. Adequate analysis. Thorough coverage of most aspects of the topic. Ample amount of data used in presentation of analysis. Gives examples from cases, laws, class work. Clear evidence of critical thinking provided Extremely thorough coverage of topic areas. In-depth analysis. Exceptional amount of data from cases, laws, class work presented. Exceptional critical thinking skills. Evaluated the research. Research from a library subscription service (preferably from subscription service from a computer professional organization)and other sources generally accepted as legitimate and valid No attempt is made to evaluate information and its sources. No sources listed or very poor research sources used. Journals not used. Ineffective evaluation of information and its sources. Minimal and/or incorrect consideration for authority, accuracy, objectivity, currency, context, and coverage of information and its sources. Wikis or Blogs were used. No journals from computer professional organizations or library resource subscription services. Basic evaluation of information and its sources. Some consideration for authority, accuracy, objectivity, currency, context, and coverage of information and its sources. Minimal amount of research from websites, technical sources and journals from computer professional organizations or library resource subscription services. Effective evaluation of information and its sources. Considers the authority, accuracy, objectivity, currency, context, and coverage of information and its sources. Uses some good resources from websites, technical sources and journals from computer professional organizations or library resource subscription services. Highly effective evaluation of information and its sources. Fully considers the authority accuracy, objectivity, currency, context, and coverage of information and its sources. Uses multiple excellent sources from websites, technical sources and journals from computer professional organizations or library resource subscription services. Presentation. Is presentation well organized, logical, clear and connect with target audience? Does content flow and cover all requirements? Is the narration conversational, not read or memorized? Is the presentation length 6 to 8 minutes? Presentation lacks organization clarity and focus. Content does not flow and requirements not covered. The entire narration is read. Does not reach target audience Presentation is either barely 2 min or over 10 minutes Minimal organization, lacks clarity and exhibits imprecise use of language. Missing major presentation requirements. Most of the narration is read or memorized. Narration makes comprehension of topic difficult unde Does not reach or connect with target audience. Presentation is 3-4 minutes or over 9 minutes. Somewhat well organized and focused. Some presentation requirements covered but not in- depth. Speaker has a number of pauses and distracting vocal qualities. Connects somewhat with target audience. ntation is minutes or over 8 minutes. Well organized, clear and precise presentation of ideas. Presentation requirements covered. Does connect with target audience. Narration is conversational but with with a few pauses and vocal qualities distra Presentation is 6 to 8 minutes Extremely well organized and easy to read. Clear, logical and focused with no evidence of "padding" Complete and thorough coverage of requirements. Narration is conversational Relates and connects with target audience. Presentation is 6 to 8 minutes. Presentation. Is presentation well organized, logical, clear and connect with target audience? Does content flow and cover all requirements? Is the narration conversational, not read or memorized? Is the presentation length 6 to 8 minutes? Presentation lacks organization clarity and focus. Content does not flow and requirements not covered. The entire narration is read. Does not reach target audience. Presentation is either barely 2 minutes or over 10 minutes. Minimal organization, lacks clarity and exhibits imprecise use of language. Missing major presentation requirements. Most of the narration is read or memorized. Narration makes comprehension of topic difficult to understand. Does not reach or connect with target audience. Presentation is 3-4 minutes or over 9 minutes. Somewhat well organized and focused. Some presentation requirements covered but not in- depth. Speaker has a number of pauses and distracting vocal qualities. Connects somewhat with target audience. Presentation is 5 minutes or over 8 minutes. Well organized, clear and precise presentation of ideas. Presentation requirements covered. Does connect with target audience. Narration is conversational but with with a few pauses and vocal qualities that distract. Presentation 6 to 8 minutes. Extremely well organized and easy to read. Clear, logical and focused with no evidence of "padding" Complete and thorough coverage of requirements. Narration is conversational. Relates and connects with target audience. Presentation is 6 to 8 minutes. Mind Map no mind map Contains limited graphics or no graphics or is cluttered with too many words or graphics. Difficult to discern what topic and presentation is about Good mind map. Contains graphics and text that make it somewhat difficult to discern what topic and current event is about Visually appealing. Contains some good graphics and text that relate to the topic and presentation Can discern what topic is about Excellent mind map. Contains excellent graphics and text that relate to the article. Can clearly discern what topic and presentation is about Writing clarity, purpose and conventions Far below expectations for work at this level. Writing is extremely unfocused. rambling, or contains major errors, lacks detail and relevant data and information, extremely disorganized. Writing does not connect to target audience. Multiple errors -sentence structure -capitalization -grammar - presentation -general structure Below expectations for work at this level. Poor writing makes it difficult to connect with target audience. 4-5 errors -sentence structure - capitalization -grammar - presentation -general structure Just meets expectations for work at this level. Connects somewhat with target audience. 2-3 errors sentence structure -capitalization grammar-presentation -general structure Work appropriate for this level of student. Does connect with target audience. 1 error-sentence structure -capitalization -grammar - presentation -general structure Work exceeds expectations for this level of student. Relates and connects with target audience. No grammar errors found. APA format No APA errors Several errors in: -cover page-in text citations -reference page - general format Does not use APA guidelines. 4-5 errors -cover page -in text citations -reference page -general format 2-3 errors -cover page -in text citations -reference page -general format 1 error-cover page -in text citations -reference page -general format Exit Name:Ethics topic rubric (paper, mind map, presentation Description: This rubric will be used for grading your paper, mind map, presentation on an ethics topic. It is 100 pt. rubric
Purchase answer to see full attachment