EH1020 Columbia Southern Unit III Texas Farming Pros & Cons Research Proposal


Columbia Southern University

Question Description

  • Grading Rubric ( Topic should be about Texas Farming pros and cons)
  • Due: Tuesday, 06/19/2018 11:59 PM (CST)


Follow the directions below for the completion of the Research Proposal assignment for Unit III. If you have questions, please email your professor for assistance.

  • Purpose: The purpose of the research proposal is to help you to understand your project, to gain direction and feedback on your project, and to establish a blueprint for your project.
  • Description: In this assignment, you will create a research proposal consisting of three sections:
    • Section 1: What is the topic? (100-150 words)
    • Section 2: What is the controversy? Include paragraphs that detail both sides of the controversy. (300-400 words)
    • Section 3: Your tentative thesis statement (one to two sentences)
  • Click here to access the research proposal example.

All sources must be documented via APA citations and references. You may also seek out the guidance of the Success Center; the specialists are always there to assist you with your writing and comprehension.

Information about accessing the grading rubric for this assignment is provided below.


The following resource(s) may help you with this assignment.

Unformatted Attachment Preview

Running head: RECYCLING CAN BE WORTH IT Recycling Can Be Worth It, If We Focus Efforts Student’s Name Columbia Southern University 1 RECYCLING CAN BE WORTH IT 2 Recycling Can Be Worth It, If We Focus Our Efforts The Topic For decades, people have expressed concern about the environment and how human activity may impact it in a negative way. Conservation efforts have included global concerns about production waste, water pollution, and endangered species. Because the scope of human activity has an array of negative effects, many people feel somewhat powerless to affect any kind of real change. As a result, ecologists and activists have attempted to educate the public about ways that every individual might make small changes that will begin to alleviate long-term effects. One of these methods is household recycling. Recently, however, some people have begun to question the efficacy of recycling as a means for alleviating landfill waste. The Controversy An on-going concern is that recycling is not the solution that the U.S. government thought it would be in the 1980s. While many people do not disagree that recycling is a good idea, there is little to incentivize people to recycle. Further, some people even question whether recycling bottles is better for the environment because of the shear amount of energy resources used in the production of recycled bottles that still cause waste. There is increasing concern about unsustainable resources and whether or not the human race can afford not to recycle. Pro Side of the Controversy While there are imperfections in the recycling process, those in favor of recycling contend that investing in the process is worth it because of the positive impacts to the environment. According to the Aluminum Association (as cited in Moss & Scheer, 2015), aluminum cans are the most recycled material, which is good because recycling these cans saves aluminum and only uses 8% of the energy to make a new can. Recycling prevents the release of RECYCLING CAN BE WORTH IT 3 dangerous carbon dioxide. According to Moss and Scheer (2015), who interviewed the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency in 2013, recycling and compositing saved nearly 186 million metric tons of carbon dioxide from being released into the atmosphere. Szaky (2015) argues that those against recycling fail to account for the current impacts of failing to recycle. For example, a new study by the 5 Gyres Institute indicates that there are more than five trillion pieces of plastic floating on the surface of the world’s oceans, which is roughly the weight of 134,500 average U.S. cars (Elks & Hower, 2014). While the statistics can be staggering, others are concerned about the economic questions regarding recycling and sustainability. Con Side of the Controversy Those who question recycling do so on the basis of effectiveness and convenience. Hutchinson (2008) contends that while a plastic water bottle might last in a landfill for centuries, the petroleum reused is barely worth the diesel fuel burned by the large trucks sent to collect the bottles. While recycling aluminum is worth the energy, recycling glass uses 21% less energy (Hutchinson, 2008). There are further concerns about looking at recycling as part of a larger picture. For example, Chris Goodall calculates that “if you wash plastic in water that was heated by coal-derived electricity, then the net effect of your recycling could be more carbon in the atmosphere” (as cited in Tierney, 2015). While some cities are attempting to convert to a “zero trash” policy within the next 15 to 20 years, there is no guarantee that these expensive measures will have any positive impacts on the environment; in fact, many speculate that the benefits are few (Tierney, 2015). RECYCLING CAN BE WORTH IT 4 Tentative Thesis Statement Recycling efforts should continue because materials that are recycled are often unsustainable, there should be a more focused effort to recycle materials that have a reproduction-cost benefit. References Elks, J., & Hower, M. (2014, December 18). Reports find over 5 trillion pieces of plastic floating in the world’s oceans…and 10,000 times more in the deep sea. Retrieved from lion_pieces_plastic_floating_world%E2%80%99s_oceans Hutchinson, A. (2008, November 12). Is recycling worth it? PM investigates its economic and environmental impact. Retrieved from /environment/a3752/4291566/ Moss, D., & Scheer, R. (2015, November 5). Is recycling worth it? Retrieved from Szaky, T. (2015, October 13). 7 reasons why recycling is not a waste: A response to “The Reign of Recycling.” Retrieved from news_and_views/waste_not/tom_szaky/7_reasons_why_recycling_not_waste_response_r eign_recycling Tierney, J. (2015, October 3). The reign of recycling. The New York Times. Retrieved from ...
Purchase answer to see full attachment

Final Answer


Rice University

Top quality work from this tutor! I’ll be back!

It’s my second time using SP and the work has been great back to back :) The one and only resource on the Interwebs for the work that needs to be done!

Thanks, good work


Brown University

1271 Tutors

California Institute of Technology

2131 Tutors

Carnegie Mellon University

982 Tutors

Columbia University

1256 Tutors

Dartmouth University

2113 Tutors

Emory University

2279 Tutors

Harvard University

599 Tutors

Massachusetts Institute of Technology

2319 Tutors

New York University

1645 Tutors

Notre Dam University

1911 Tutors

Oklahoma University

2122 Tutors

Pennsylvania State University

932 Tutors

Princeton University

1211 Tutors

Stanford University

983 Tutors

University of California

1282 Tutors

Oxford University

123 Tutors

Yale University

2325 Tutors