Short Term Funding PowerPoint Presentation with Detailed Speaker Notes and No Plagiarism

Anonymous
timer Asked: Jun 20th, 2018
account_balance_wallet $25

Question Description

I am currently in a "Corporate Finance" graduate master's program course and was needing some help for a PowerPoint project presentation assignment that has to include "detailed speaker notes" within using appropriate APA citations and references, especially as it relates to any "financial or statistical data information" we are explaining to a group of executives. Also, per instructor no plagiarism involved since it will be checked and any type of website images or mathematical table charts or graphs we present within the slides, also has to be properly APA cited as well. Below is the following details on this PowerPoint Presentation assignment:

Purpose of Assignment

The purpose of this assignment is to allow the student an opportunity to apply their understanding of cash flow management, break-even analysis, and short-term and long-term financing in starting and growing a business.

Assignment Steps

Resources: OECD Database, Corporate Finance (OECD Database attached below).

Prepare a 12- to 15-slides or more PowerPoint® presentation with detailed speaker notes requesting initial funding of $500,000 to start and run a start-up company. The proposed start-up company could be an existing business model (coffee shop, pet store, etc.) or could be something entirely new and exciting.

No plagiarism and will be checked! Most importantly, any web site images or table charts and graphs of any financial and statistical data used must be appropriately cited per instructor request!

Create the presentation in the following format, with at least one slide or more to cover each of the following areas: Please include appropriate “title headings” based on each subject topic and “short bullet point topics” (2-3 bullet points) for each slide based on information you are presenting pertaining to topic title heading.

  • Title Page
  • Table of Contents
  • Executive Summary-detailed speaker notes with APA citations
  • Information about the Industry-detailed speaker notes with APA citations
  • Marketing Plan-detailed speaker notes with APA citations
  • Competitor Analysis-detailed speaker notes with APA citations
  • 3 Year Income Statement (Profit & Loss) Projections-detailed speaker notes with APA citations
  • Include your assumptions for why and how you will achieve your sales growth and what significant expenses and investments you expect to incur to achieve your revenue goals.-detailed speaker notes with APA citations
  • 3 Year Proposed Funding Schedule (Sources and uses of the funds received.)-detailed speaker notes with APA citations
  • Break-Even Analysis-detailed speaker notes with APA citationsConclusion-detailed speaker notes with APA citations
  • Conclusion-detailed speaker notes with APA citations-detailed speaker notes with APA citations
  • Academic and Business References- include direct web links that are used

Review the following scenarios and assumption, and explain how it impacts your decision to expand:-to also incorporate within PowerPoint Slide Presentation.

Please include appropriate “title headings” based on each subject topic and “short bullet point topics” (2-3 bullet points) for each slide based on information you are presenting pertaining to topic title heading.

After Year 3, the investors are interested in your company expanding internationally to possibly outsource labor or to reduce manufacturing costs. What countries would you expand to first, and why? What factors would you need to consider in making this decision?-detailed speaker notes with APA citations

What is the corporate tax rate in the countries you are considering expanding your business to, and how will that affect your decision to expand globally? (Use OECD Database or another resource to determine the corporate tax rate). OECD Database attached below and use detailed speaker notes with APA citations.

The investors want to see a decision tree detailing the decisions you would make if you received $300K now and $200K at the end of three years instead of $500K up front.-detailed speaker notes with APA citations

The investors would like your team to provide advantages and disadvantages of using debt financing versus selling company stock to raise capital for growth.-detailed speaker notes with APA citations

Briefly explain the venture capital process. Does it make sense for your company to raise funds through venture capital? -detailed speaker notes with APA citations

Format your presentation consistent with APA guidelines (references and citations). No plagiarism and will be checked! Most importantly, any web site images or table charts and graphs of any financial and statistical data used must be appropriately cited per instructor request!

Tags: powerpoint presentation executive summary marketing plan Conclusion Title page competitor analysis break even analysis No Plagiarism and will be checked Detailed Speaker Notes for each slide APA citations and references with direct web links of sources cited Any website or table charts and graphs used must be properly APA cited APA cite any financial or statistical information per instructor request 12 to 15 slides or more for presentation OECD Database pdf attachment Use appropriate title headings for based on each subject topic Use short bullet point topics of anywhere between 2-3 for each slide based on topic of presentation Table of Contents Information about the industry 3 Year Income Statement Profit and Loss Projections Include assumptions for why and how you will achieve sales growth and what expenses and investments you expect to incur to achieve revenue goals 3 Year Proposed Funding Schedule with Sources and uses of the funds received Academic and Business References Used with direct web links of reference info cited What countries to expand first and why What factors you need to consider in making this decision What is the corporate tax rate in the countries your considering expanding your business to How will it affect your decision to expand globally Use OECD Database or another resource to determine corporate tax rate Decision Tree detailing the decisions to make if you received $300K now and $200K at the end of three years instead of $500K up front Provide advantages and disadvantages of using debt financing versus selling company stock to raise capital for growth Explain venture capitalist process and does it make sense for your company to raise funds through venture capital

Unformatted Attachment Preview

F -X C h a n ge F -X C h a n ge N y bu OECD TAX DATABASE EXPLANATORY ANNEX PART II TAXATION OF CORPORATE AND CAPITAL INCOME (Document updated October 2016) 1 ac .c tr om k lic C om k lic C .c re . . k e r- s o ft w a w w ac ww ww tr to to bu y N O W ! PD O W ! PD k e r- s o ft w a re F -X C h a n ge F -X C h a n ge N y bu Table of contents II.1. BELGIUM II.1. CANADA II.1. CHILE II.1. FRANCE II.1. GERMANY II.1. GREECE II.1. HUNGARY II.1. ISRAEL II.1. ITALY II.1. LATVIA II.1. LUXEMBOURG II.1. MEXICO II.1. NETHERLANDS II.1. NORWAY II.1. POLAND II.1. SLOVAK REPUBLIC II.1. SLOVENIA II.1. SWITZERLAND II.1. UNITED STATES 4 5 5 5 6 6 9 9 10 16 17 18 18 18 19 19 20 20 20 II.2. BELGIUM II.2. CANADA II.2. CHILE II.2. CZECH REPUBLIC II.2. HUNGARY II.2. ISRAEL II.2. ITALY II.2. LATVIA II.2. MEXICO II.2. NETHERLANDS II.2. NORWAY II.2. PORTUGAL II.2. SLOVAK REPUBLIC II.2. SPAIN II.2. UNITED KINGDOM II.2. UNITED STATES 22 24 25 25 26 26 27 27 27 28 28 28 29 29 30 31 II.3. CANADA II.3. GERMANY II.3. LUXEMBOURG II.3. KOREA 32 33 33 33 2 ac .c tr om k lic C om k lic C .c re . . k e r- s o ft w a w w ac ww ww tr to to bu y N O W ! PD O W ! PD k e r- s o ft w a re F -X C h a n ge F -X C h a n ge N y bu II.3. PORTUGAL II.3. SWITZERLAND II.3. UNITED STATES 33 34 34 II.4. AUSTRIA II.4. BELGIUM II.4. CANADA II.4. CHILE II.4. FINLAND II.4 FRANCE II.4. GERMANY II.4. GREECE II.4. HUNGARY II.4. IRELAND II.4. ISRAEL II.4. ITALY II.4. KOREA II.4. LATVIA II.4. MEXICO II.4. NETHERLANDS II.4. NORWAY II.4. PORTUGAL II.4. SLOVAK REPUBLIC II.4. SLOVENIA II.4. SWITZERLAND II.4. UNITED STATES 36 36 37 37 37 37 38 39 40 41 41 42 43 43 43 43 43 44 44 44 44 45 3 ac .c tr om k lic C om k lic C .c re . . k e r- s o ft w a w w ac ww ww tr to to bu y N O W ! PD O W ! PD k e r- s o ft w a re F -X C h a n ge F -X C h a n ge N y bu PART II. TAXATION OF CORPORATE AND CAPITAL INCOME PART II, TABLE 1 CORPORATE INCOME TAX RATES II.1. BELGIUM The effective CIT rate can be substantially reduced by an allowance for corporate equity (ACE). The amount of this allowance is neither related to the behaviour nor to the results of the company, but depends only upon the amount of qualifying corporate equity and the yield on long term government bonds. There is however an upper limit. The original upper limit (of 6.5 % for non-SMEs) was first temporarily reduced to 3.8% in 2010 and 2011 and then permanently lowed to 3% from 2012 onwards. The effectively applied ACE-rates are listed in the table below. Stricter carry forward rules concerning unused ACE-deductible amounts were implemented from 2013 onwards. Notional interest rate (ACErate) Non-SMEs Small and medium enterprises (SMEs) 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 3.442% 3.781% 4.307% 4.473% 3.8% 3.425% 3% 2.742% 2.63% 1.63% 1.131% 3.942% 4.281% 4.807% 4.973% 4.3% 3.925% 3.5% 3.242% 3.13% 2.13% 1.631% The lower the return on equity before tax, the lower the effective tax rate due to this allowance for corporate equity. E.g. the effective tax rate is only half the nominal tax rate when the return on equity before tax is twice the notional interest rate. The following table illustrates the impact of the ACE on the effective tax rate when the gross return on equity equals respectively 2, 3 or 4 times the notional interest rate. non-SMEs 2016 Gross return on equity (gROE) gROE / ACE-rate ACE-rate 2016 Tax base Nominal CIT rate CIT Net profit without ACE 2.262 gROE = 2 ACErate 2.262 gROE = 3 ACErate 3.393 gROE = 4 ACErate 4.524 2 0 2.262 33.99% 0.769 1.493 2 1.131 1.131 33.99% 0.384 1.878 3 1.131 2.262 33.99% 0.769 2.624 4 1.131 3.393 33.99% 1.153 3.371 4 ac .c tr om k lic C om k lic C .c re . . k e r- s o ft w a w w ac ww ww tr to to bu y N O W ! PD O W ! PD k e r- s o ft w a re F -X C h a n ge F -X C h a n ge N y bu Effective CIT rate 33.990% 16.995% 22.660% 25.493% II.1. CANADA The representative sub-central government tax rate is an average of provincial corporate income tax rates, weighted by the provincial distribution of the federal corporate taxable income. A federal surtax increased the general federal corporate income tax rate by 1.12 % between 1995 and 2007. Budget 2006 eliminated this surtax for all corporations as of January 1, 2008. II.1. CHILE Business profits made by individuals or legal entities resident or domiciled in Chile are taxed via the First Category Tax (FCT) levied at a tax rate of 24% in 2016 (in the case of taxpayers adhered to the totally integrated with income attribution tax regime, an income tax rate of 25% will apply from 2017 onwards; for taxpayers adhered to the partially integrated income tax system, a tax rate of 25.5% will apply in 2017 and 27% will apply from 2018 onwards). It applies to profits from any commercial activity whether the enterprise is a legal entity, a branch, a permanent establishment of a foreign company, sole proprietorship or an individual. The tax base is defined as total income less the costs and expenses required to produce it taking into account inflation adjustments. A loss incurred may be carried back and/or forward and deducted against profits without time limit. - It may also be offset against previous retained earnings in a kind of carry-back. Individuals and legal entities that are not resident or domiciled in Chile are generally taxed on any income derived from Chilean sources at a standard tax rate of 35% (lower rates apply for some types of income and are available under double taxation agreements). II.1. FRANCE The rates in Table II.1 include surcharges, but do not include the local business tax (Contribution économique territoriale, which replaced the former local business tax, the Taxe professionnelle from January 1st 2010), the 3 % additional contribution on distributed profits, the temporary surtax applied to 250 million (rate of 5% in 2011 and 2012 and 10,7% onwards) abolished in 2016, and the turnover-based solidarity tax (Contribution de Sociale de Solidarité sur les Sociétés). The Contribution Sociale de Solidarité sur les Sociétés is levied at a rate of 0.16% (0.13% plus a surcharge of 0.03%) of the turnover of companies, excluding VAT and is deductible for income tax purposes. [1] The standard corporate income tax rate is 33.33% [2]. It is increased by a 3.3% surcharge (Contribution Sociale sur les Bénéfices) for companies with a turnover of at least EUR 7,630,000 on the part of their liable tax payments in excess of EUR 763,000 - resulting in an effective tax rate of 34.43% for companies that have profits above EUR 2,289,000. Since 2011, many reforms have broadened the corporate tax base. The carry-back of losses has been reduced from three to one year and the carry-forward of losses limited to 60 % of the income above EUR 1 million taxable profit, and eventually to 50 % as from 2012. Furthermore, the deduction of net financial expenses has been limited to 85 % of net interest charges for [1] The French government has recently announced that both the temporary surtax and the turnover-based solidarity tax will be phased out by 2017 [2] The French government has recently announced that the standard corporate income tax rate will be gradually lowered to 28% by 2020, starting in 2017 5 ac .c tr om k lic C om k lic C .c re . . k e r- s o ft w a w w ac ww ww tr to to bu y N O W ! PD O W ! PD k e r- s o ft w a re F -X C h a n ge F -X C h a n ge N y bu 2012 and 2013 fiscal years (only when they exceed EUR 3 000 000) and 75 % since 2014. Finally, exemptions on capital gains on sale of affiliates have been reduced. The Contribution économique territoriale (CET) is composed of two separate taxes, the corporate property contribution (cotisation foncière des entreprises, or CFE) and the contribution for value added (cotisation sur la valeur ajoutée des entreprises, or CVAE). Like the former local business tax (the Taxe professionnelle, abolished in 2010), this tax applies to branches and subsidiaries established in France. The value added). The CFE is based on the value of owned or leased office premises. The productive investments are no longer taxed, as it was with the previous local business tax, i.e. equipment and movable property which include machines, tools, movable property and equipment. The CFE is calculated by multiplying the cadastral value of the premises by a certain coefficient, assessed annually by the local authorities. The local authorities also set the minimum contribution payable by the companies in their jurisdiction. The contribution for value added by businesses (CVAE) is assessed on the value added companies realize during the previous calendar year or the last 12-month financial year if this does not coincide with the calendar year. It applies to firms concerned by the CFE with turnover exceeding EUR 152,500. Only companies with annual pre-tax turnover of over EUR 500,000 must pay the CVAE, but all have to declare the value added created during the fiscal year. The CVAE rate is theoretically 1.5% for companies with an annual pre-tax turnover of over EUR 50 million. Below this amount, companies are subject to a reduced CVAE rate, adjusted according to the level of the company turnover. The assessed value added is itself capped, depending on the case, at 80% or 85% of t is below or above EUR 7,600,000). II.1. GERMANY The representative sub-central government corporate income tax rate is for Berlin. In the years between 2000 and 2007 this rate was 0.05 (general rate) * 410 % (local multiplier ( %. As the local business tax was deductible from its own base, the effective rate was 20.5 / 120.5 = 17 %. This implies that the effective central government corporate income tax rate in 2007 was 26.375 % * (1-0.17) = 21.9 %. The combined corporate income tax rate in 2007 was therefore 38.9 %, as it also was in 2006, 2005, 2004, 2002 and 2001. In 2003, the effective central government corporate income tax rate was 27.96 % * (1-0.17) = 23.2 % due to a temporary increase in the tax rate in order to finance the repair of the damages caused by the major floods in 2002. The combined corporate income tax rate in 2003 was therefore 40.2 %. In 2000, the effective central government corporate income tax rate was 42.2 % * (10.17) = 35 %. The combined corporate income tax rate was therefore 52 %. With the Corporate Tax Reform in 2008 the representative sub-central government corporate income tax rate was changed to 14.35 % (0.035 general rate * 410 % multiplier ( ). Local business tax is no longer deductible from its own base. The central government corporate income tax rate was reduced to 15 %. The combined corporate income tax rate is now at a level of 30.18 %. II.1. GREECE Corporate Taxation According to the Greek Income Tax Code in force, which was enacted with the Law 4172/2013 and replaced the previous Code (Law 2238/1994), the tax rate imposed on the worldwide income acquired by 6 ac .c tr om k lic C om k lic C .c re . . k e r- s o ft w a w w ac ww ww tr to to bu y N O W ! PD O W ! PD k e r- s o ft w a re F -X C h a n ge F -X C h a n ge N y bu legal persons and legal entities is 26%. This rate applies to income derived during the tax years beginning on or after 1.1.2014. For additional information concerning previous years, see explanatory notes for table II.4. According to the Law 4334/2015 (Art. 1), the corporate income tax rate was increased to 29%. This rate applies to profits derived during the tax years beginning on or after 1.1.2015. Legal persons and entities that are subject to CIT include: a. b. Private companies that were established in Greece or abroad (partnerships) and keep doubleentry books c. Non-profit legal persons governed by public or private law and established in Greece or abroad, that keep single-entry books, including all types of associations and foundations, except any income derived in pursuit of the fulfillment of their mission, which is not subject to tax, d. Cooperatives and Associations that keep double-entry books, e. Civil law societies, civil profit or non-profit companies, joint-stock or silent companies, that keep double-entry books, provided that they are engaged in business activities, f. Joint ventures that keep double-entry books g. Legal entities (as defined in Art. 2 of the Income Tax Code) that keep double-entry books and are not included in the previous cases. Profits from business activity derived by Agricultural Cooperatives and producer groups are subject to a 13% tax rate. The Law provides certain tax exemptions. For instance, the Greek State, the Bank of Greece, as well as the Holding Companies, the Undertakings for collective investment in transferable securities (UCITS) established in Greece or in another EU or EEA member-state and the Hellenic Republic Asset Development Fund are fully exempt from taxation.. Government bodies are only liable to tax in respect of income from capital and surplus from capital transactions. A special tax regime (tonnage tax) applies for the operation of ships under Greek flag. Additionally, tax exemption applies in any income derived in Greece by foreign legal persons or individuals according to the special provisions of a Double Taxation Convention or a Multilateral International Convention or reciprocity conditions (NATO, UN, diplomatic missions etc.). Distributed profits are subject to a withholding tax of 10%. In case of a parent-subsidiary relationship, dividend payments and profit distributions paid by subsidiary permanent establishment companies to their parent companies established in another EU Member-State shall be exempt from withholding tax provided that the conditions set forth in Art. 63 ITC are fulfilled (application of the EU Parent-Subsidiary Directive). Partnerships, joint ventures - other legal entities 7 ac .c tr om k lic C om k lic C .c re . . k e r- s o ft w a w w ac ww ww tr to to bu y N O W ! PD O W ! PD k e r- s o ft w a re F -X C h a n ge F -X C h a n ge N y bu (2000-2012) TAX RATES FOR LEGAL ENTITIES (except for those subject to corporate income taxation) Type of legal person Limited partnership (EE) & Unlimited general partnership (OE), Civil law communities Joint ventures, Civil companies, , Silent partnerships and Participation companies Legal services companies of L.518/89, Notary companies of L.284/93 1/1/2000 31/12/2004 1/1/200531/12/2005 1/1/200631/12/2006 1/1/200731/12/2007 1/1/2008 31/12/2009 1/1/201031/12/12 24% 22% 20% 20% 20% 35% 32% 29% 25% 25% 25% 25% 25% 25% 25% 25% 25% 25% Partnerships under the Greek Law may be either general or limited partnerships. From 2010 to 2012 the above mentioned tax rate of 20% was imposed on the profits relating to partners who were individuals, following the deduction of their entrepreneurial fee, whereas the profits corresponding to legal entities partners were taxed at a 25% rate. The Law 4110 /2013, as replaced by the Law 4172/2013 brought significant changes to the tax regime of partnerships, civil law societies, silent partnerships, participation companies, joint-ventures, legal services and notary companies, which from 1/1/2013 onwards are taxed with the following tax schedule: Partnerships, joint ventures Income bracket 50.000 Excess Tax rate (%) 26% and other legal entities keeping single entry accounting books (2013-2016) Tax bracket 13.000 Total amount of 50.000 13.000 33% The tax treatment of the legal entities that keep double-entry books is now aligned with that of corporations (SAs, LLCs and PCCs), which means that the total amount of their net profits is taxable at the level of the entity (taxation at the level of the entrepreneur is abolished), whereas a 10% withholding tax is imposed on distributed profits. All the above rates are decreased by 40% for income earned from business activities in Greek islands with less than 3.100 inhabitants. 8 ac .c tr om k lic C om k lic C .c re . . k e r- s o ft w a w w ac ww ww tr to to bu y N O W ! PD O W ! PD k e r- s o ft w a re F -X C h a n ge F -X C h a n ge N y bu II.1. HUNGARY The rates do not include a turnover-based local business tax. Local governments are entitled to levy a local business tax on corporations in their jurisdiction, which is generally levied on the net sales revenue less the revised total sum of the acquisition costs of goods sold and the value of mediated services, subcontractor fees, material costs and costs directly related to R&D activities. The maximum rate is 2 %. Some local governments grant exemptions for small businesses. The rates do not include the innovation tax as well. This tax is levied on the same basis as the local business tax. The innovation tax rate was 0.2 % in 2004, 0.25 % in 2005, and is 0.3 % from 2006. Small and micro enterprises are exempted from this tax. As from 2007 credit institutions are obliged to pay 5 % surtax on interest income from loans associated with state subsidies. This tax is excluded from the table. As from 2009 corporations supplying energy products are obliged to pay a surtax of 8 % on the basis of (adjusted) profit before taxation. As of 1 January 2013 the rate of this surtax is 31%. This tax is excluded from the table. In 2005 and 2006 credit institutions and financial enterprises were obliged to pay a special tax on their interest income (tax rate was 6 %) or on the profit before corporate income tax (tax rate was 8 %). This tax is excluded from the table. In the period of 1 September 2006-31 December 2009, taxpayers were obliged to pay a surtax of 4 % on the basis of (adjusted) profit before taxation. As from September 2010, financial corporations are obliged to pay an extra levy. Different rules have been applicable to institutions engaged in different activities. A temporary sectoral crisis tax was levied in years 2010-12 the energy, telecommunications and consumer goods retail sectors. The crisis tax was levied on the net sales turnover realized by corporations in the specific taxable sectors. II.1. ISRAEL The following table shows the historical tax rates for tax on the combination of wages and salaries and profits that the Financial Institutions pay in lieu of VAT. Period 1 January 2000 -14 June 2002 15 June 2002- 29 February 2004 1 March 2004- 30 June 2006 1 July 2006- 30 June 2009 1 July 2009 31 Dec 2009 1 January 2010 31 Aug 2012 1 Sept 2012-31 May 2013 1 June 2013-30 September 2015 1 October 2015 Tax rate (percent) 17 18 17 15.5 16.5 16.0 17.0 18.0 17.0 9 ac .c tr om k lic C om k lic C .c re . . k e r- s o ft w a w w ac ww ww tr to to bu y N O W ! PD O W ! PD k e r- s o ft w a re F -X C h a n ge F -X C h a n ge N y bu II.1. ITALY Italian Local Income Tax ILOR Law no.825 of 1971 introduced local income tax. This tax was applied: in the case of individuals wherever resident, on income accrued within the territory of the State, excluding income from employment calculated for personal income tax purposes; In the case of legal persons, on the overall net income calculated for the purposes of corporate income tax. Although initially the revenue was allocated to local authorities, starting from 1974 the income was included in the State budget and the tax was no longer considered as local. The tax was deductible for the purposes of personal income tax, while for the purposes of corporate income tax, it was deductible from 1971 to 1990, partially deductible in 1991 and non-deductible until its abolition in 1998. This tax was abolished with the introduction of IRAP (Regional Tax on Productive Activities). The Dual Income Tax (DIT) The Dual Income Tax (DIT) is a special regime for the taxation of business income introduced with legislati ...
Purchase answer to see full attachment

Tutor Answer

SIMPLIFIED
School: Cornell University

Attached.

INTRODUCTION
BODY
REFERENCE


CORPORATE FINANCE INDUSTRY
Name
Institution

Table of Content















Executive summary
Background information of industry
Marketing plan
Competitor analysis
3-year income statement
Assumptions
3-year proposed funding schedule
Break-even analysis
Expansion countries
Corporate tax rate
Debt financing vs. selling company stock
Venture capital process
Conclusion
Reference

Executive Summary
• The industry aims at increasing its value and
management actions
• Experience stiff competition, (Fracassi, 2016).
• Future expansion benefits
• Manages its cash flow, break-even analysis,
short and long-term financing, (Bhagat, Bolton
&...

flag Report DMCA
Review

Anonymous
Thanks, good work

Similar Questions
Related Tags

Brown University





1271 Tutors

California Institute of Technology




2131 Tutors

Carnegie Mellon University




982 Tutors

Columbia University





1256 Tutors

Dartmouth University





2113 Tutors

Emory University





2279 Tutors

Harvard University





599 Tutors

Massachusetts Institute of Technology



2319 Tutors

New York University





1645 Tutors

Notre Dam University





1911 Tutors

Oklahoma University





2122 Tutors

Pennsylvania State University





932 Tutors

Princeton University





1211 Tutors

Stanford University





983 Tutors

University of California





1282 Tutors

Oxford University





123 Tutors

Yale University





2325 Tutors