Article and ppt slide summary

User Generated

ohuuwx

Business Finance

Description

you have to make a summary for article and ppt slide, one page for each.

you should not have any reference in your work, use your own words.

Unformatted Attachment Preview

The Marketing Message of Theodore Levitt “And if you want biographies," Friedrich Nietzsche once wrote, “do not look for the legend Mr. So-and-so, and his times,' but for one whose title might be inscribed a fighter against his time." That is the role—as a “fighter against his time”—that Theodore Levitt has played during his intellectual life. This was a role he earned the right to play. Levitt mastered "normal science" before setting off in search of new "paradigms."l His doctoral dissertation, “World War II Manpower Mobilization and Utilization in a Local Labor Market,” was squarely in the main- stream of academic endeavor. Firmly grounded in economics through his doctoral training at Ohio State, Levitt proved he could satisfy the most rigorous standards of his profession by publishing in the American Economic Review, the Review of Economics and Statis- tics, the Journal of Finance, and elsewhere.3 Levitt's goal, however, was always to make a difference—a big difference not only in his own discipline but in academics as a whole and indeed in society. He wanted to think creatively. It was the combination of his background in formal economics along with a jagged streak of lightning called genius that enabled him to succeed at so doing. One of Levitt's articles is entitled “Marketing Success Through Differentiation-of Anything." His own greatest achievement in differentiation has been of himself. Theodore Levitt has written numerous articles that have changed the way important people think about important matters (which was his own standard when he served as editor of the Har- vard Business Review). Among the most noteworthy of these is “The Globalization of Markets," published in 1983. The article's argument is that new technology, which has “pro- letarianized” communication, transport, and travel, has created “a new commercial reality—the emergence of global markets for stan- dardized consumer products” of a hitherto undreamed-of magni- tude. The era of the “multinational corporation" was drawing to a close, Levitt asserted. The future belonged to the “global corpora- tion.” The global corporation did not cater to local differences in taste. Those differences were being overwhelmed by the ability of the global corporation to market standardized products of high quality at a cost lower than that of competitors due to enormous economies of scale in production, distribution, marketing, and management." The global corporation was being called forth by a new era of "homogenized demand.” Levitt's claim was breathtaking in its inclusiveness. “Nothing," he declared, “is exempt.” Not steel, not automobiles, not food, not clothes. Variety costs money, and the modern consumer demanded the best for less. Levitt is a man of the world, quite aware of the conflicts that pockmark it. He makes reference to the 1979 Iranian uprising that resulted in the downfall of the shah, to the Nigerian-Biafran civil war, to life in Bahia in Brazil and in Krasnoyarsk in Siberia. But though beliefs might differ sharply from one nation or region to the next, consumption patterns were converging. The rebels in Iran were wearing “fashionable French-cut trousers and silky body shirts.” In Biafra, “soldiers carrying bloodstained swords” were “lis- tening to transistor radios while drinking Coca-Cola.” The world was witnessing nothing less than the “vindication of the Model T," the basic transportation vehicle of which Henry Ford said, “It takes you there, and it brings you back." There is no other appeal like price. People like money, and they want to spread it over as many goods as they can. What the global company understands, which the multinational does not, is the power of scarcity: “Nobody takes scarcity lying down; everybody wants more." If “The Globalization of Markets” were the only article one had ever read about marketing, one would find its argument com- pelling. But in the context of its times, what Levitt was proposing was little short of a revolution in both how companies organized themselves and in how they thought about what they were doing. Levitt's argument flew in the face of hallowed principles of mar- keting both and what seemed to be the stark realities of the world as it was in 1983. Consider, for example, what had come to be known during the quarter-century prior to the 1983 publication of “Globalization” as "the marketing concept." We do not mean a marketing concept; in fact we must italicize the article: the marketing concept. By 1983, this idea, so simple that it scarcely seems to deserve the label “concept,” was that companies should give customers what they want. The marketing concept gained currency during the 1950s and was founded on the belief that the “problem of pro- duction" had been solved. Supply-side shortages not being in the offing, there was no need for companies to be guided by a pro- duction analogue to the marketing concept. “The sales concept," such as it was, had also fallen into disrepute in the literature. The sales concept was about pushing a product onto the consumer through sales techniques.” The “sales concept" was waning as early as 1941. IBM, for example, which was in the process of developing one of the greatest sales forces in history, was instructing its sales- people by that time to tell prospects that their job was not "to sell” but "to serve." Thus, we arrive at the marketing concept.” Behind the phrase lay the idea that business begins not with the factory but with the customer. Marketing was the most important of business functions because it drove everything else—or at least that was the ideal. In practice, businesses kept seeming to revert to the satisfaction of their own internal needs at the expense of customer desires. Look around, and you will find that this is true today. The promise of customer satisfaction is omnipresent. (No company promises cus- tomer dissatisfaction.) Delivering on the promise is a good deal less common. There are two specific references to the Marketing Concept in “Globalization," and the idea is alluded to elsewhere without being labeled. Levitt treats this central idea of his discipline without much respect. Somehow, corporations had allowed themselves to fall prey to the perverse practice of the marketing concept and the absence of any kind of marketing imagination....” (p. 98). "Most executives in multinational corporations are thoughtlessly accommodating. They falsely presume that marketing means giv- ing the customer what he says he wants rather than trying to under- stand exactly what he'd like." What Levitt appears to be saying is that it is up to the company to know more about what the customer wants than the customer himself or herself does, or at least more than the customer can articulate. He uses as an illustration the failed attempt by Hoover to market its washing machine throughout western Europe. The cause of this failure was Hoover's “proper' marketing orientation.” The company conducted consumer research at a fine-grained level that revealed that customers in various countries wanted different features. The manufacturing costs of providing these features drove the price of the appliance up, and the product did not sell. What went wrong? Two things. First, Hoover asked the wrong questions. It sought, in the type of phrase for which Levitt became famous, to learn “what features (customers] wanted in a washing machine rather than what they wanted out of life.” Second, Hoover paid too much attention to what people said and too little to what was actually going on in the marketplace. Did everyone want a washing machine specifically customized to their living space? Yes. Was everyone willing to pay substantially more money for such a washing machine, thus depriving them- selves of other possessions? No. “[People] preferred a low-priced automatic ... even though [it] failed to fulfill all their expressed preferences. The supposedly meticulous and demanding German customers violated all expectations by buying the simple, low- priced Italian machines” (p. 98). The conclusion was that a cursory examination of the Hoover story would leave one with the belief that global marketing is impossible because of the strength of national wants and needs. But what a little digging reveals is that we have seen a "distorted version” and the “perverse practice” of the marketing concept. And we have seen something else: what Levitt referred to as a "failure of nerve." Marketers must be more than mere receptacles of information (which is sometimes poorly specified and collected). They must actively mold the markets to which they sell. If Hoover had acted in that aggressive fashion, it would have succeeded. With will and vision, global marketing could become a reality. Levitt was well aware at that time of the appeal of low prices.10 In recent years, Clayton Christensen of the Harvard Business School wrote The Innovator's Dilemma," a book that became world famous and in which he asserted ideas quite similar to Levitt's. Christensen's thesis is that in their rush to give customers precisely what they want, companies customize too much, spend too much, and therefore charge too much. They thus leave themselves open to the "disruptive innovator," marketing a product that is not per- fect in terms of every function and feature but is good enough and a lot less expensive. Although Christensen's book is not concerned with world trade, the basic market dynamic he sees conforms to Levitt’s. Variety is often generated by organizational dynamics inter- nal to the firm. Customers tend to be unwilling to pay as much for that variety as marketers may like to think. In one sense, the ideas in “The Globalization of Markets” are not surprising. For years, people had been coming to think of the world as a single unit rather than as a patchwork of nations and cus- tomers. The first armed conflict deemed a “world” war took place between 1914 and 1918 (even though it was less a global conflict than, say, the Seven Years' War of 1756 to 1763, which stretched from Canada to India). The term global village was coined in 1960.12 The realization that radioactive fallout from nuclear weapons could have global consequences led to the Nuclear Test Ban Treaty of 1963,13 and general concerns for the environment led to Earth Day in April 1970.14 The space race, beginning with Sputnik in 1957 and climaxing with the moon landing in 1969, endowed human beings with a whole new perspective on “spaceship earth.” Meanwhile, a little closer to home, social critics following World War II were beginning to complain of the very homoge- nization that Levitt was inviting corporations to exploit. The term Coca-Colonization gained a certain currency during the 1940s and 1950s, suggesting the imposition of American cultural values on the world through the spread of its consumer products.15 In 1967, the French journalist Jean-Jacques Servan-Schreiber published The American Challenge, in which he portrayed Europe being overrun by American capital and American business organization prac- tices. 16 Various domestic observers as well were noting with disap- proval the “global reach” of what appeared to be the inexorably growing American business firm.17 That said, there is another sense in which the ideas in “The Globalization of Markets” are daring. In 1983, the world was still very much a bipolar place, divided between “communist” and “democratic” nations. The cold war had heated up considerably with the Soviet invasion of Afghanistan in 1979. It was in 1983 that President Ronald Reagan called the Soviet Union the “evil empire," and this cartoon-strip phrase struck a responsive chord in much of the American public. 18 Those people living under com- munist regimes knew precious little of markets in the Western sense, never mind marketing. In 1983, there were, in fact, only a handful of countries in which corporations had home offices that sold products or services
Purchase answer to see full attachment
User generated content is uploaded by users for the purposes of learning and should be used following Studypool's honor code & terms of service.

Explanation & Answer

Hello,I have submitted your solution. Kindly take a look and propose any possible changes. Feel free to make me your regular tutor by inviting me to any questions you post.😀

The marketing message of Theodore Levitt
Theodore Levitt was a legend in his intellectual life time. He could master all the
concepts of the normal scientific knowledge and could determine different paradigms relating to
the scientific information. His main objective was to make a difference in the academic sector
including the discipline that he was part of. Theodore Levitt is the author of several articles that
have transformed the way relevant people think about relevant factors. One of the articles of
Theodore, talks on the marketing principles that if an organization could follow, it could end up
being suc...


Anonymous
Great study resource, helped me a lot.

Studypool
4.7
Trustpilot
4.5
Sitejabber
4.4

Similar Content

Related Tags