watch this video and answer the followingvideo: 1. Assume that a court decided that the driver was on a detour from his regular duties and that the driver was negligent when he ran over Mr. Melnick's dog. Who would be liable to Mr. Melnick? SELECT ONEa. Both Oscar (or his store) and the driverb. The store only; neither Oscar nor the driverc. The driver onlyd. Neither Oscar (or his store) nor the drivere. Oscar (or his store) only2. Assume that Oscar tells Mr. Melnick that he will pay for Melnick's dog, even if not legally required to do so, because he thinks the driver did the right thing by driving the van to the hospital. Is Oscar now liable to pay damages?Select one:a. yes, because of operation of implied authorityb. yes, because of operation of ratificationc. no, because of operation of implied ratificationd. yes, because of operation of express authoritye. no, because of operation of implied authority3. The duty of agents to principals that the driver most likely violated by driving the store's customer to the hospital in Oscar's store's truck without Oscar's express permission is:Select one:a. notificationb. loyaltyc. obedienced. accountinge. all of the above4. FILL IN THE BLANKS :When a principal, through words or actions, causes a third party to believe that an agent has authority to act for the principal, courts may find a/an ______________to exist. This is somewhat different from a situation in which an agent does what is reasonably necessary to accomplish the authorized objectives of his or her agency, which we call _______________ . In either case, because agency exists, the principal has a duty to the agent to provide ______________ to him or her for legal liabilities the agent may incur in the course and scope of the agency; that is, to pay him or her back for any money damages suffered. The agent in turn, owes the principal both _________ , which means that the agent cannot pursue personal or any other party's interest in carrying out the goal of the agency, and _____________ , meaning the agent must follow all lawful and clear instructions of his or her principal in conducting the agency.OPTIONS: Loyalty, obedience, indemnification, cooperation, implied authority, performance, compensation, apparent authority, express authority

This week’s discussion will focus on cultural decision-making using the case study “Brief Integrative Case 2.1: Coca-Cola in India” (p. 248) in International Management: Culture, Strategy, and Behavior. This case focuses on the cultural differences of the U.S. company Coca- Cola and the country of India. In this situation, the people in the area around the Coca-Cola plant accused Coca-Cola of reducing the water levels, and more importantly, contaminating the water supply used for farming and personal consumption in their bottling process. After reflecting on this situation involving cultural differences, as a leader, how might MNEs demonstrate their commitment to working with different countries like Saudi Arabia and respecting the cultural and natural environments of the country? What types of decisions would you need to make? Would there be bias in the decision-making process? Can you give an example?