Making Toys Globally case study

User Generated

xrvxb26

Writing

Description

All submissions has to be done through Turnitin

Read the case and answer the discuss questions below in a FULL page single space

1. How realistic do you think it is to create a world standard for toys with respect to their safety and use by children?

2. Should we ban products from a country that does not follow standards similar to what the U.S. Consumer Product Safety Commission suggests for the United States? Is the CPSC overprotective? Should each country have its own guidelines? Why or why not?

3. If there are health risks associated with lead poisoning, what about related areas such as lead in drinking water (e.g., the issue that came to the forefront in the 2016 U.S. presidential campaign regarding water supply in Flint, Michigan)?

4. Is lead in toys a financial, or cost, issue? Why have we not seen the toy industry monitor and do something about the lead problem, even though we have known about it for more than 30 years?

Requirements:

  1. The write-up reflects a clear understanding of the case
  2. The write-up reflects critical thinking and the application of appropriate concepts/ideas from the course
  3. Each answer should be discussed in its own paragraph(s). The write-up has an appropriate length of at least several paragraphs.
  4. The write-up is well written, reflecting clarity of thought, as well as correct grammar, punctuation, and spelling
  5. The student appropriately cites any outside sources using APA format.

Unformatted Attachment Preview

closing case Making Toys Globally Toys for children are made in numerous countries and then exported to buyers throughout the world. In some countries, such as the United States, certain protection exists to make sure that toys are safe for children. The U.S. Consumer Product Safety Commission (CPSC) regularly issues recalls of toys that have the potential to expose children to danger such as lead or other heavy metals. For example, lead may be found in the paint used on toys and in the plastic used to make the toys. If ingested (e.g., children chewing on toys), lead is poisonous and can damage the nervous system and cause brain disorders. Lead is also a neurotoxin that can accumulate in both soft tissue and bones in the body. For these reasons, lead was banned in house paint, on toys marketed to children, and in dishes or cookware in the United States in 1978. In addition, in an agreement between China’s General Administration of Quality Supervision, Inspection and Quarantine (AQSIQ) and CPSC, the Chinese agreed to take immediate action in 2007 to eliminate the use of lead paint on Chinese manufactured toys that are exported to the United States. With China’s prominence as a toy manufacturing country, this agreement was a step toward making safe products for children. Still, lead continues to be a hazard in a quarter of all U.S. homes with children under age six. In fact, a wide range of toys and children’s products, including many market-leading and reputable brands, often contain either lead or other heavy metals (e.g., arsenic, cadmium, mercury, antimony, or chromium). Estimates exist that suggest that one-third of Chinese toys contain heavy metals. This is a major problem given that China manufactures 80 percent of the toys sold in the United States. Researchers from Greenpeace and IPEN conducted a study by buying 500 toys and children’s products in five Chinese cities. They tested the products with handheld X-ray scanners and found that 163 of the toys were tainted with heavy metals above the norm (32.6 percent). “These contaminated toys not only poison children when chewed or touched, but can enter the body through the air they breathe,” said Ada Kong Cheuk-san at Greenpeace. While lead in the paint on toys has not been eliminated, the focus on cleaning up lead in the paint has been given front-page coverage ever since the agreement to eliminate it in 2007. It is certainly not gone, but at least more and more people are paying attention. Several organizations— both governmental and private—are examining lead-based paint in toys on a continual basis. For example, the New York Times and Consumer Reports recently found that dangerous products for children are still widely available. The Ecology Center has created a website called HealthyStuff.org that contains a database of toys and other products that have been tested for dangerous chemicals. While lead in paint seems to be in focus, the use of lead in plastics has not been banned! Lead is used to soften the plastic and make it more flexible to allow it to go back to its original shape after children play with the toys. Plus, lead may also be used in plastic toys to stabilize molecules from heat. Unfortunately, when the plastic is exposed to sunlight, air, and detergents, for example, the chemical bond between the lead and plastics breaks down and forms dust that can enter the human body. Another unfortunate part about lead is that it is invisible to the naked eye and has no detectable smell. This means that children may be exposed to lead from toys (and other consumer products) through normal playing activity (e.g., hand-to-mouth activity). As everyone with children knows, children often put toys, fingers, and other objects in their mouth, exposing themselves to lead paint or dust. Children are also more vulnerable to lead than adults; there is no safe level of lead for children. The worldwide toy industry has published a voluntary standard of 90 parts per million for lead in toys, which, of course, is greater than a ban on lead in paint used for toys and in the materials used to make the toys (such as plastics). But since 2007, the world has at least seen stricter standards—either voluntary or regulated standards—that make it safer for children to play with newly purchased toys. The CPSC in the United States, the European Union, and China’s AQSIQ are actively monitoring and seemingly enforcing stricter standards. But, according to Scott Wolfson of the CPSC, many toy manufacturers have been violating safety regulations for almost 30 years. So, are toys safer now than they were before 2007, and are they really safe to play with throughout the world? What do we do with the old toys? Sources: M. Moore, “One Third of Chinese Toys Contain Heavy Metals,” The Telegraph, December 8, 2011; P. Kavilanz, “China to Eliminate Lead Paint in Toy Exports,” CNN Money, September 11, 2007; U.S. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. www.cdc.gov; “U.S. Prosecutes Importers of Toys Containing Lead, Phthalates,” AmeriScan, February 26, 2014. CASE DISCUSSION QUESTIONS 1. How realistic do you think it is to create a world standard for toys with respect to their safety and use by children? 2. Should we ban products from a country that does not follow standards similar to what the U.S. Consumer Product Safety Commission suggests for the United States? Is the CPSC overprotective? Should each country have its own guidelines? Why or why not? 3. If there are health risks associated with lead poisoning, what about related areas such as lead in drinking water (e.g., the issue that came to the forefront in the 2016 U.S. presidential campaign regarding water supply in Flint, Michigan)? 4. Is lead in toys a financial, or cost, issue? Why have we not seen the toy industry monitor and do something about the lead problem, even though we have known about it for more than 30 years? Chapter Five Ethics, Corporate Social Responsibility, and Sustainability 149
Purchase answer to see full attachment
User generated content is uploaded by users for the purposes of learning and should be used following Studypool's honor code & terms of service.

Explanation & Answer

Attached.

Running head: CASE STUDY ON MAKING TOYS GLOBALLY

Case Study on Making Toys Globally
Name
Instructor
Course
Date

1

CASE STUDY ON MAKING TOYS GLOBALLY

2

Case Study on Making Toys Globally
With respect to safety of children and use, I see it realistic and pertinent in creating a
world standard for toys. Heavy metals such as lead pose a serious health issue to all people
irrespective of age. In today's generation, most children cannot do without toys and this makes
them prone to long-lasting health conditions. Most toys are painted with lead and through
licking, chewing, and placing such toys in the mouth make toddlers ingest the lead. Effects of
lead on developing child lead to brain disorders and nervous systems (Gleick, 2011). Also, lead
can accumulate on both soft tissues and bones of the kids leading to malformation. Due to those
health effects...


Anonymous
Great! 10/10 would recommend using Studypool to help you study.

Studypool
4.7
Trustpilot
4.5
Sitejabber
4.4

Similar Content

Related Tags