HC 306 week 5 Purchase Proposal Research
Unit 5 Assignment 1 - Purchase ProposalSubmit AssignmentDue Sunday by 11:59pm Points 50 Submitting a text entry box or a file uploadEstimated time to complete: 2 hoursInstructionsYou are the practice manager for Dermatology Associates of Linwood (DAL): a multi-physician dermatology practice. Recently, the physician partners have decided to invest in purchasing an existing dermatology practice in a neighboring city, which will be operated under the group's name. They have asked you to research the financial logistics of acquiring this new location. The practice is fully-staffed, however the (one) physician owner is retiring, leaving an opening for a new physician to be hired. In keeping with DAL's standard of care, several new expenses will be incurred with the acquisition, including: access to DAL's electronic medical record system, a Fraxel laser, and new furniture for the waiting room area.Draft a proposal, addressing the following items in a Word document:Summary of estimated primary startup costs (create a table to illustrate and organize this information)Financing optionsSummary of when the practice will reach profitability. Explain the finance principle you can use to make this determination. (You do not need to perform the calculations, but you do need to explain how to estimate and assess profitability).Include a minimum of three references, APA style, on a separate page.Please review the rubric to ensure that your assignment meets criteria.Submit:Purchase ProposalRubricHC306 - Unit 5 Assignment 1HC306 - Unit 5 Assignment 1CriteriaRatingsPtsThis criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeContent15.0 pts5Demonstrates the ability to construct a clear and insightful problem statement/thesis statement/topic statement with evidence of all relevant contextual factors.14.0 pts4Demonstrates the ability to construct a problem statement, thesis statement/topic statement with evidence of most relevant contextual factors, and problem statement is adequately detailed.12.0 pts3Begins to demonstrate the ability to construct a problem statement/thesis statement/topic statement with evidence of most relevant contextual factors, but problem statement is superficial.11.0 pts2Demonstrates a limited ability in identifying a problem statement/thesis statement/topic statement or related contextual factors.9.0 pts1Demonstrates the ability to explain contextual facts but does not provide a defined statement.0.0 pts0There is no evidence of a defined statement.15.0 ptsThis criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeAnalysis25.0 pts5Organizes and compares evidence to reveal insightful patterns, differences, or similarities related to focus.23.0 pts4Organizes and interprets evidence to reveal patterns, differences, or similarities related to focus.20.0 pts3Organizes and describes evidence according to patterns, differences, or similarities related to focus.18.0 pts2Organizes evidence, but the organization is not effective in revealing patterns, differences, or similarities.15.0 pts1Describes evidence, but it is not organized and/ or is unrelated to focus.0.0 pts0Lists evidence, but it is not organized and/ or is unrelated to focus.25.0 ptsThis criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeWriting5.0 pts5The paper exhibits a excellent command of written English language conventions. The paper has no errors in mechanics, grammar, or spelling.4.5 pts4The paper exhibits a good command of written English language conventions. The paper has no errors in mechanics, or spelling with minor grammatical errors that impair the flow of communication.4.0 pts3The paper exhibits a basic command of written English language conventions. The paper has minor errors in mechanics, grammar, or spelling that impact the flow of communication.3.5 pts2The paper exhibits a limited command of written English language conventions. The paper has frequent errors in mechanics, grammar, or spelling that impede the flow of communication.3.0 pts1The paper exhibits little command of written English language conventions. The paper has errors in mechanics, grammar, or spelling that cause the reader to stop and reread parts of the writing to discern meaning.0.0 pts0The paper does not demonstrate command of written English language conventions. The paper has multiple errors in mechanics, grammar, or spelling that cause the reader difficulty discerning the meaning.5.0 ptsThis criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeAPA5.0 pts5The required APA elements are all included with correct formatting, including in-text citations and references.4.5 pts4The required APA elements are all included with minor formatting errors, including in-text citations and references.4.0 pts3The required APA elements are all included with multiple formatting errors, including in-text citations and references.3.5 pts2The required APA elements are not all included. AND/OR there are major formatting errors, including in-text citations and references.3.0 pts1Several APA elements are missing. The errors in formatting demonstrate limited understanding of APA guidelines, in-text-citations, and references.0.0 pts0There is little to no evidence of APA formatting. AND/OR there are no in-text citations AND/OR references.5.0 ptsTotal Points: 50.0PreviousNextUnit 5 Assignment 1 - Purchase ProposalSubmit AssignmentDue Sunday by 11:59pm Points 50 Submitting a text entry box or a file uploadEstimated time to complete: 2 hoursInstructionsYou are the practice manager for Dermatology Associates of Linwood (DAL): a multi-physician dermatology practice. Recently, the physician partners have decided to invest in purchasing an existing dermatology practice in a neighboring city, which will be operated under the group's name. They have asked you to research the financial logistics of acquiring this new location. The practice is fully-staffed, however the (one) physician owner is retiring, leaving an opening for a new physician to be hired. In keeping with DAL's standard of care, several new expenses will be incurred with the acquisition, including: access to DAL's electronic medical record system, a Fraxel laser, and new furniture for the waiting room area.Draft a proposal, addressing the following items in a Word document:Summary of estimated primary startup costs (create a table to illustrate and organize this information)Financing optionsSummary of when the practice will reach profitability. Explain the finance principle you can use to make this determination. (You do not need to perform the calculations, but you do need to explain how to estimate and assess profitability).Include a minimum of three references, APA style, on a separate page.Please review the rubric to ensure that your assignment meets criteria.Submit:Purchase ProposalRubricHC306 - Unit 5 Assignment 1HC306 - Unit 5 Assignment 1CriteriaRatingsPtsThis criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeContent15.0 pts5Demonstrates the ability to construct a clear and insightful problem statement/thesis statement/topic statement with evidence of all relevant contextual factors.14.0 pts4Demonstrates the ability to construct a problem statement, thesis statement/topic statement with evidence of most relevant contextual factors, and problem statement is adequately detailed.12.0 pts3Begins to demonstrate the ability to construct a problem statement/thesis statement/topic statement with evidence of most relevant contextual factors, but problem statement is superficial.11.0 pts2Demonstrates a limited ability in identifying a problem statement/thesis statement/topic statement or related contextual factors.9.0 pts1Demonstrates the ability to explain contextual facts but does not provide a defined statement.0.0 pts0There is no evidence of a defined statement.15.0 ptsThis criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeAnalysis25.0 pts5Organizes and compares evidence to reveal insightful patterns, differences, or similarities related to focus.23.0 pts4Organizes and interprets evidence to reveal patterns, differences, or similarities related to focus.20.0 pts3Organizes and describes evidence according to patterns, differences, or similarities related to focus.18.0 pts2Organizes evidence, but the organization is not effective in revealing patterns, differences, or similarities.15.0 pts1Describes evidence, but it is not organized and/ or is unrelated to focus.0.0 pts0Lists evidence, but it is not organized and/ or is unrelated to focus.25.0 ptsThis criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeWriting5.0 pts5The paper exhibits a excellent command of written English language conventions. The paper has no errors in mechanics, grammar, or spelling.4.5 pts4The paper exhibits a good command of written English language conventions. The paper has no errors in mechanics, or spelling with minor grammatical errors that impair the flow of communication.4.0 pts3The paper exhibits a basic command of written English language conventions. The paper has minor errors in mechanics, grammar, or spelling that impact the flow of communication.3.5 pts2The paper exhibits a limited command of written English language conventions. The paper has frequent errors in mechanics, grammar, or spelling that impede the flow of communication.3.0 pts1The paper exhibits little command of written English language conventions. The paper has errors in mechanics, grammar, or spelling that cause the reader to stop and reread parts of the writing to discern meaning.0.0 pts0The paper does not demonstrate command of written English language conventions. The paper has multiple errors in mechanics, grammar, or spelling that cause the reader difficulty discerning the meaning.5.0 ptsThis criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeAPA5.0 pts5The required APA elements are all included with correct formatting, including in-text citations and references.4.5 pts4The required APA elements are all included with minor formatting errors, including in-text citations and references.4.0 pts3The required APA elements are all included with multiple formatting errors, including in-text citations and references.3.5 pts2The required APA elements are not all included. AND/OR there are major formatting errors, including in-text citations and references.3.0 pts1Several APA elements are missing. The errors in formatting demonstrate limited understanding of APA guidelines, in-text-citations, and references.0.0 pts0There is little to no evidence of APA formatting. AND/OR there are no in-text citations AND/OR references.5.0 ptsTotal Points: 50.0PreviousNext