I need help with my Unit 2 discussion board question for my BCJ 2000 class

timer Asked: Jul 4th, 2018
account_balance_wallet $5

Question description

The question is:

Considering the crime control and due process models of our criminal justice system, is it possible to achieve a balance (both a reliable and efficient criminal justice process) at the same time? Explain your reasoning.

UNIT II STUDY GUIDE Crime Control vs. Due Process Model Course Learning Outcomes for Unit II Upon completion of this unit, students should be able to: 1. Summarize the core segments of the U.S. criminal justice system and the interactions between each segment. 1.1 Identify a course project topic within the selected field of criminal justice. 7. Compare the crime control model and due process model within the law enforcement system. Reading Assignment In order to access the resource below, you must first log into the myCSU Student Portal and access the Criminal Justice database within the CSU Online Library. In order to access the following resource(s), click the link(s) below: https://libraryresources.columbiasouthern.edu/login?url=http://search.proquest.com.libraryresources.columbia southern.edu/docview/219920806?accountid=33337 Only read Parts I and II of the article: Macdonald, S. (2008). Constructing a framework for criminal justice research: Learning from Packer's mistakes. New Criminal Law Review, 11(2), 257-311. Click here to access an interactive lesson regarding Due Process. Unit Lesson As you discovered in Unit I, the primary goal of the American criminal justice system is a system of fairness where it is important to find that balance between an individual’s rights and public order. As you will see throughout the study of criminal justice, this theme will continually reemerge. For this lesson, the study of the due process model versus the crime control model is at the heart of this concept. One must understand that striving to find (or maintaining, for that matter) a balance between securing the general public and protecting them from crime and harm and securing our civil and individual rights is a tall order in today’s society. Many criminal justice, law enforcement, and legal professionals (along with researchers) have polarized views of what works. The million-dollar question is whether one can achieve a balance. Must one give up some sense of public or social order in order to fully maintain the rights of the individual, or must one give up some sense of individual rights in order to maintain order? Can one do both? You decide as you dig deeper into the tug of war between crime control and due process. Herbert L. Packer was a well-known law professor and criminologist who first developed the two models of the criminal process you know today as the crime control and due process models. The first of the two models to be discussed in this unit is the crime control model. Essentially, the premise behind this concept encompasses having the priority of controlling crime in an effort to avert a breakdown in public order. Under this model, the absolute most important objective is enforcing laws and keeping criminal activity under strict control. Packer (1964) suggests that if law enforcement cannot achieve this goal and crime flourishes, society suffers from a lack of public order and, subsequently, a loss of freedom. Furthermore, and equally critical to this concept, is the nexus between the way in which laws are enforced and the correlation on the effectiveness of the legal controls. Essentially, if laws are loosely enforced, a disregard for legal authority can ensue (Packer, 1964). This theory, simply put, is referred to as a lack of deterrence within criminal justice. When there is a lack of enforcement for certain laws or a degree of leniency for certain crimes, crime rises. BCJ 2000, Introduction to Criminal Justice 1 Macdonald (2008) supports this notion stating the “the crime control model is in factxconcerned with the way UNIT STUDY GUIDE in which the apprehension and conviction of offenders is pursued is confirmedTitle by Packer’s analogies of an assembly line and an obstacle course” (p.9). What is it within the crime control model that must be done in order for it be effective? Well, one first must look to arrest and conviction rates. If there is a perception, as stated earlier, of a failure to apprehend and convict those engaging in crime, then the criminal justice system is not operating up to par. The crime control model works due to a high degree of efficiency; whereas, in order for this concept to work, one must pay close attention to the ability, as a criminal justice system, to carry out the criminal justice process. Simply put, this correlates to a high rate of apprehension, trying, and convicting of criminal offenders. If done efficiently, as Packer outlines, the crime control model has succeeded in maintaining public order and controlling crime. At the other end of the spectrum in the American criminal justice system lies the due process model. Due process rejects the concepts of the crime control model, which relies heavily on those responsible for the investigation and prosecution of crimes to fully understand what actually occurred during the alleged crime (Packer, 1964). Instead, this concept is replaced with a process that swings in favor of the suspect and considers the possibility that a witness (or victim) could be biased or have presented an inaccurate account of the event or a confession (or admission) could have been coerced. Essentially, the interests of the accused are critical to the due process model, and an informal fact finding process is rejected (MacDonald, 2008). Rather, a “formal, adjudicative, adversary fact finding processes in which the factual case against the accused is publicly heard by an impartial tribunal and is evaluated only after the accused has had a full opportunity to discredit the case against him” is favored (Packer, 1964, p. 14). What one sees here as well is an emphasis placed on law enforcement to fully recognize the rights of those accused or suspected as it relates to the arrest, interrogation, and overall processing of a particular case. As you have learned in this lesson, the crime control and due process models have differing objectives and goals. References Macdonald, S. (2008). Constructing a framework for criminal justice research: Learning from Packer's mistakes. New Criminal Law Review, 11(2), 257-311. Packer, H. L. (1964). Two models of the criminal process. University of Pennsylvania Law Review, 113(1), 1-68. Suggested Reading Use the Internet to locate the 1964 article below explaining two models of the criminal process, the crime control model and the due process model. Packer, H. L. (1964). Two models of the criminal process. University of Pennsylvania Law Review, 113(1), 168. BCJ 2000, Introduction to Criminal Justice 2

Tutor Answer

School: UT Austin

Hello, i have completed the assignment. it has been nice working with you.

Criminal Justice System
Thesis statement: A balance cannot be achieved when the crime control and due process
models are involved at the same time.
1. Description of crime control and due process models
2. Reasons why a balance cannot be achieved between these two models


Criminal Justice System
Institution Affiliation




Description of crime control and due process models
The crime control and due process models are mainly involved in challengi...

flag Report DMCA

Totally impressed with results!! :-)

Similar Questions
Hot Questions
Related Tags

Brown University

1271 Tutors

California Institute of Technology

2131 Tutors

Carnegie Mellon University

982 Tutors

Columbia University

1256 Tutors

Dartmouth University

2113 Tutors

Emory University

2279 Tutors

Harvard University

599 Tutors

Massachusetts Institute of Technology

2319 Tutors

New York University

1645 Tutors

Notre Dam University

1911 Tutors

Oklahoma University

2122 Tutors

Pennsylvania State University

932 Tutors

Princeton University

1211 Tutors

Stanford University

983 Tutors

University of California

1282 Tutors

Oxford University

123 Tutors

Yale University

2325 Tutors