please find the attached file. let me know if any adjustment is required. good bye
Argument: ‘The Fountain’ can be art
Even though’ the Fountain’ cannot be classified under the traditional work of art of a
painting or a sculpture, it is in fact art. ‘The fountain’ is striking because it was not a simple
porcelain urinal. The work is more than a piece of mischief meant to mock the art world,
because it introduces an aspect of conceptual art where it is possible to consider a work of art
which is not really a traditional piece. This is possible by being able to look at an everyday
object with different eyes, and not simply see it as the everyday item it is, due to its usual
Even though the artist, MarcelDuchamp, may not have been involved in the designing
or making of the piece of urinal, he signed it and exhibited it as a work of art which
communicates a certain message. By signing it and presenting it, the urinal gained a new
power and an ability to express more than its ordinary role, thus it makes a statement of some
sort. This change of expression should be the point at which a utility can be elevate to the
same level as an aesthetics piece which is automatically considered a piece of art.
A piece of art is supposed to raise questions and change how people interpret ...