Carrell, M. R. & Heavrin, C. (2013). Labor relations and collective bargaining: Private and public sectors (10th ed.). Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice Hall.
Read Case Study 4-1, “Salting,” on pages 155-156 of your textbook. Then, address the following:
1. Explain how the company’s treatment of both the “covert” and “overt” salts applications for jobs compares to the recommended counter-salting steps for employers.
2. Would either the “covert” or the “overt” salts in this case satisfy the NLRB ruling that applicants for employment must be genuinely interested in seeking employment before claiming protection under the NLRA?
3. Does the company’s opposition to becoming a union shop indicate that there was anti-union animus in refusing to consider the “overt” salts for employment?
Your response should be a minimum of 150 words per question. All sources used, including the textbook, must be referenced; paraphrased and quoted material must have accompanying citations in APA format.
Information about accessing the Blackboard Grading Rubric for this assignment is provided below.
Explanation & Answer
Hello, review the attached document and contact me in case you need any changes. Otherwise, good luck in your study and if you need any further help in your assignments, please let me know. Always invite me to answer your questions.Goodbye.
Case Analysis 4.1
The salting process as described in the case study, whether the covert or overt applicants are
considered or not, there should be some considerations which should apply to the employers.
First, there is the principle of openness, which implies that the employees must reveal all the
information that may be ...