Biblical Integration Essay Instructions Overview The goal of this essay is for you to know God in a deeper way after you are done than when you started. You will write a 1,500 word essay that examines an ethical issue and applies the provided biblical integration model to arrive at a biblical worldview of that issue and more importantly, arrive at a deeper understanding of who God is in terms of our relationship with Him. The instructions below describe what is required to complete this assignment. Materials Required To complete this deliverable, you will need the following materials This documentMicrosoft Word Instructions Select one of the following ethical issues as it relates to ERP systems: PrivacyAccessAccuracyProperty rightsGreen computingCompliance issues (e.g., Sarbanes-Oxley, etc.) With the chosen ethical issue as a context, write a 1,500 word essay that answers the following four questions in clearly marked sections. Who is God (i.e., what are His characteristics/attributes that apply to the context)?What biblical principles or commands apply to the context?What should our response be, based on who God is and His principles/commands? Your answer should really be one of three options: affirm what the secular worldview says as true, reject what the secular worldview says as false, or redeem the secular worldview by more closely aligning it with the principles and commands of scripture.Who is God (i.e., now that you see how God’s principles have informed your response, how does that change your relationship with Him)? Your essay must use a minimum of 5 biblical references to support your key points, but avoid quoting long passages of scripture. The idea is to write the essay in your own words, but substantiate your thoughts with biblical support.

(N.B. Please read instructions thoroughly before beginning to answer questions.) Please select three (3) of the following essay questions, and respond to them in the form of a brief essay of approximately 500-600 words. Make sure in each that you are not just stating your positions on the questions, but giving the reasons or arguments that you think support those positions, too. You will be graded not on whether you get the questions “right,” but on the quality of your arguments. Do not do more than 3 – extra answers will not yield extra credit. Choose the 3 to which you can provide the best answers, and write on those and those only. A few things to note: • This exam is entirely open-note. You are free to use any notes or course material to aid you in developing your answers. • This is a take-home exam. To turn it in, simply attach your answers to an email message to me, just as you have for past writing assignments. • Make sure that you avoid plagiarism – there is no reason for you to use outside sources to answer any of these questions. You may make use of my lecture notes to help you understand the relevant ideas, but be sure to reformulate things in your own words, just as you would if you were sitting this exam in person in a classroom. • You should feel free to reach out to me if you have any clarification questions. I will try to help you understand what the questions are asking as much as possible, but I will (naturally) not give you direct help in answering them. (Look at the next page to see the exam questions.) Here are the possible questions: (1) Explain how you think a Kantian and a utilitarian would respond to the case of Baby Theresa, discussed in Rachels’ “What is Morality,” pp. 1-5? (See Unit 1 for a PDF of this reading.) Explain not just the position they would take, but the reasons and arguments they would present for taking it. (2) What would John Stuart Mill think about Robert Nozick’s “Experience Machine” thought experiment (from Unit 2)? Would Mill think that we should plug in to it, or not? What would his arguments be? (3) Is Todd May right to think that Aristotle’s virtue ethics is also a form of “altruism” in his sense? That is, does Aristotle’s virtue ethics demand a kind of selfless moral perfection of us, as Kantianism and utilitarianism do? (4) What would a Kantian say about Todd May’s ethics of “decency”? On what key points would the Kantian agree and disagree? (5) Imagine Peter Singer responding to Todd May’s claims about the ethics of charitable giving. On what key points would he agree and disagree? (Look at Singer’s “Famine, Affluence, and Morality” in Unit 4, and chapter 3 of May’s A Decent Life.) (6) Is this statement true or false? Support your answer with arguments: “None of the three major theories is really true or false. They’re just different ways people might prefer to live. The disagreements between them mean nothing more than the disagreements between people about which is their favorite ice cream flavor, or pop song