Description
Introduction
A joint effort conducted by the USSS NTAC and the USDOE (Reddy et al., 2001), looked at the many instances of targeted mass violence and mass murders occurring on campuses, as well as domestic terrorism, and this led to the creation of the SSI. This same group also began to consider the intended and unintended consequences of laws and legislation as it relates to students' civil liberties.
During this same period of time, local, state, and federal law makers were being increasingly pressured by constituents to develop laws specifically targeting school violence, which led to the birth of zero tolerance.
Originally created at the federal level to address firearms on school property, local and state governments and boards of education began to develop their individual zero tolerance laws, rules, regulations, policies, and procedures.
In preparation for this discussion, research the intended consequences of the original zero tolerance laws, as well as the unintended consequences.
Instructions
In your main post:
- Describe how your local school board implements zero tolerance.
- Evaluate an example of one outcome of the implementation of zero tolerance in your local school system.
- Articulate why, based on your readings, the public might want to abandon these zero tolerance laws, rules, regulations, policies, and procedures.
Discussion Objectives
The competencies addressed in this discussion are supported by discussion objectives, as follows:
- Competency 1: Assess the phenomenon of school violence.
- Describe how your local school board implements zero tolerance.
- Evaluate an example of one outcome of the implementation of zero tolerance in your local school system.
- Articulate why, based on your readings, the public might want to abandon these zero tolerance laws, rules, regulations, policies, and procedures.
- PLEASE NOTE...….THIS IS JUST A DISCUSSION AND REQUIRE ONLY ONE REFERENCE
Explanation & Answer
Attached.
Report: Consequences of Zero Tolerance
Consequences of Zero Tolerance
by HAL
General metrics
2,529
346
26
1 min 23 sec
2 min 39 sec
characters
words
sentences
reading
time
speaking
time
Writing Issues
No issues found
Plagiarism
This text seems 100% original. Grammarly found no matching text on
the Internet or in ProQuest’s databases.
Report was generated on Monday, Jul 23, 2018, 1:40 PM
Page 1 of 2
Report: Consequences of Zero Tolerance
Unique Words
56%
Measures vocabulary diversity by calculating the
percentage of words used only once in your
document
unique words
Rare Words
43%
Measures depth of vocabulary by identifying words
that are not among the 5,0...