Description
n a 8- to 10-page report, analyze this case and address the following to the best of your abilities:
- What tests or assessments would you recommend to provide a comprehensive diagnostic assessment of Ms. Tyler?
- Provide diagnostic impressions based upon the case and the tests you have recommended. Provide an explanation or a rationale for how you arrived at this diagnosis.
- What are the psycholegal issues to be assessed? What are the standards used to evaluate these issues (i.e., discuss the relevant court decisions and holdings)?
- What tests should be administered and why? What is the empirical support for the tests you have suggested?
- What other information do you need to offer an opinion on whether Ms. Tyler is competent to stand trial?
- What other information do you need to offer an opinion as to whether Ms. Tyler met the legal criteria for insanity at the time of the offense?
- What outcomes do you expect will be reached by the court with regard to these issues and why?
- What are the potential ethical issues involved in this case? How would you resolve these issues?
Unformatted Attachment Preview
Purchase answer to see full attachment

Explanation & Answer

Attached.
OUTLINE
1. INTRODUCTION
2. BODY
3. CONCLUSION
4. REFERENCE
RunningHead: LAW
Psychological Assessment
Name
Course Title
Instructor
Date
LAW
2
PSYCHOLOGICAL ASSESSMENT
Forensic assessment entails complete incorporation of information form individuality
inventories, capability and intelligence examinations, interest surveys and attitudes, as well as
structured medical interviews. Psychiatrists thus contribute to the evaluation procedure.
Diagnostic assessments can identify appropriate medical treatment, and may as well help in
educational and vocational planning. In the end, the process offers information concerning exact
aptitude and propensities, and the current functioning level, which can influence learning and
other cognitive behaviors (American Psychological Association, 2018). During the Psycholegal
assessment process, the forensic psychologists offer expertise on the mental issues of the legal
procedures in the trial courts by translating the intellectual data into the legal framework. In this
role and responsibility, the psychiatrists may be needed to evaluate a defendant regarding fitness
to stand trial, malingering, and treatment matters among others. Additionally, they also assist in
assessing the witness credibility, selection of the jury, training and evaluating police personnel,
and lastly give the criminal profile.
The psychosomatic assessment services provided are planned to enhance comprehension
of how people operate and learn by utilizing reliable educational, psychodiagnostic and the
neuropsychological tests. A comprehensive valuation helps those who are struggling with the
social, emotional or the behavioral difficulties to ensure the achievement of such problems. The
moment one begins to show indicators of social, emotional or behavioral issues, they are referred
to the medical facilities by the forensic psychologists for evaluation. In the process, various tests
are applied to facilitate and effectuate the operation.
LAW
3
Recommended tests for diagnostic assessment of Ms. Tyler
In this case scenario, Ms. Tyler has been referred to the Southern Counties Detention
Center for evaluation after denying the past mental therapies since her responses conflict the
witness credibility as well as the relatives and individuals' perceptions regarding her medical
condition that could have led to the criminal action. Concerning the reports from the relatives
and witnesses, positive history based on the psychological disorders, as well as the medication
Ms. Tyler is currently using, she is likely to suffer from the mental illness (Goldstein, 2006, 08).
Therefore, for the effectiveness of the diagnostic evaluation of Ms. Tyler, some tests have been
recommended for the responsible psychiatrist. To begin with, there is M'Naghten Insanity
Defense commonly known as the right-wrong test. This test is cognitive and dwells on the
criminal defendant's awareness and not on the ability to manage conduct. It needs two elements
including the fact that the defendant has to suffer from a psychological defect at the moment the
criminal act is committed, which consist of the disease of mind or deficiency of reason
depending on the jurisdiction. Secondly, the trier of information has to find that due to the mental
error, the offender never knew both the quality and the nature of the crime or that the criminal
act was wrong.
The second test includes the Durham rule, which states that, in spite of the medical
diagnosis, the offender's psychological defect leads to crime. The test is used when the crime
perpetrator is not blamewo...
