Simulator transfer of training (ToT) is a term used to describe to what extent a skill learned in a training device can be applied in the actual aircraft without requiring additional airborne training. Controlled experiments can actually measure ToT as a numerical value. For instance, a ToT of 0.5 means that for every hour spent in a simulation device, one-half hour of training in the aircraft can be eliminated, i.e., 50% of the simulator training transfers to the aircraft. A positive ToT equates to monetary savings on fuel and instructor hours, as well as wear and tear on the aircraft. The FAA and Part 121 carriers in the US (and most nations) operate on the assumption that the multi-million dollar Class C/D simulators used for pilot training have a ToT of very close to 1.0, meaning no additional training is required in the aircraft. This is why the FAA allows a new First Officer to fly a revenue flight as his or her first flight in that aircraft, though under the supervision of an instructor Captain. However, studies have shown that even very basic simulation devices can also lead to a high transfer of training of both technical and CRM skills. Other studies indicate that motion or high-resolution visual displays may not be necessary for high ToT. This module week, you will discuss whether or not full motion, high fidelity simulators should continue to be required to train airline pilots, as is the current situation. Could simpler/cheaper Flight Training Devices be used instead? Can manual flying procedures such as instrument approaches be effectively taught in BATDs or AATDs (see FAA Advisory Circular AC 61-136A - PDF)? Download AATDs (see FAA Advisory Circular AC 61-136A - PDF)?What about CRM? Can CRM skills be taught, practiced, and evaluated in a simulator that does not have full motion or high-res visuals? Does the specific skill being taught affect the outcome? Support your position with more than just opinion or by stating, "motion makes a sim more like the aircraft, so it must be better."