Running head: 3.3 - CASE STUDY 1, PART 2 3.3 - Case Study 1, Part 2 Michael R. Walker Embry Riddle 1 3.3 - CASE STUDY 1, PART 2 2 3.3 - Case Study 1, Part 2 Using the information from Deep Water Horizon explosion and the PHL you constructed, Part 1 Preliminary Hazard List (PHL) Table Preliminary Hazard List (PHL) Project: Deepwater Horizon Date: 8/19/2018 Prepared by: Hazardous Event Hazard Causes Consequences Recommendations The small Accumulation of Widening of the diameter of the explosive gasses hole Lack of a Reduction of Use of an cementing cement quality evaluation log. evaluation log. down the casing Misinterpretation Human Lack of test Invalid and Employment of of the pressure assessment wrong more than one tests tools conclusions tool for assessing Category High pressure in Physical the hole. hole. Inadequate Mechanical cementing the tests. The rise of Lack of an Ignition of Development of a reservoir fluids efficient reservoir fluids good working and monitoring and associated monitoring hydrocarbons at system gasses system. the rig floor Chemical 3.3 - CASE STUDY 1, PART 2 3 Now take the PHL you made in part 1 of this case study and construct a detailed Preliminary Hazard Analysis (PHA) on each item on your PHL. Realize that the PHA takes what your brainstorming session came up with in the PHL and gets a little more into the weeds with such things as causal factors, consequences, and relative risk. These are the things you should focus on in a one to two-page report to your boss. Use the Risk Assessment Matrix to quantify the risks you identify.
Purchase answer to see full attachment