Assignment 2: Course Project, Part V: Evaluation, Final This assignment has two parts. Part 1: Write a 2–3 page evaluation of the quality improvement program that you have created. This should be the annual summary of the hypothetical data. Make sure your hypothetical data are credible. Part 2: As you may recall from Week 1, your Course Project was to prepare a total quality improvement program, with a focus on one high-risk area. Continuous quality improvement covers many areas. Throughout the course, you have learned about the attributes that constitute a quality improvement team and what questions this team attempts to answer. The assignments toward this project that you completed each week can now be assembled into a single instructional document. Make necessary adjustments to your document so that each segment flows smoothly into the next. Evaluate your project using the criteria given below. Are the indicators and their measurements appropriate to the high-risk area? Do the indicators capture the risk?Are the fictional incidents realistic and plausible?Is the filled chart consistent with the fictional incident?Is the plan of correction feasible? Will it prevent the occurrence of the incident in future?How do you know the plan worked? What measures will you use to identify effectiveness? Submit it to the W5: Assignment 2 Dropbox by Tuesday, April 5, 2016. Name your document SUO_HCM4002_W5_A2_LastName_FinalInitial.doc. On a separate page, cite all sources using the APA format. Assignment 2 Grading Criteria Maximum Points Analyzed all indicators monitored and measured in the performance improvement project. 30 Included specific, realistic hypothetical data to evaluate the improvement of chosen indicators. 40 Explained indicators, measurements, and fictional incidents. 50 Provided valid values in the chart that are consistent with the fictional incident. 50 Explained in detail a feasible plan of correction, as well as its capacity for preventing other incidents. 60 Presented a structured document free of spelling and grammatical errors. 10 Cited sources using the APA format. 10 Total 250Psychiatry

Discuss the Nursing care of age-related Physiologic or Psychologic Disorder.Present the age-related Physiologic or Psychologic DisorderChoose from one: Integumentary function, Urinary function, Musculoskeletal function or Endocrine function.Describe the age-related changes and common problems and conditions.Summarize the nursing management appropriate for your Physiologic or Psychologic Disorder chosenSubmission Instructions:Presentation is original work and logically organized. Followed current APA format including citation of references.Power point presentation with 4-6 slides were clear and easy to read. Speaker notes expanded upon and clarified content on the slides.Incorporate a minimum of 4 current (published within last five years) scholarly journal articles or primary legal sources (statutes, court opinions) within your work.Journal articles and books should be referenced according to current APA style.

CompetencyThis deliverable will allow you to apply deductive and inductive reasoning to analyze and create valid arguments.InstructionsPart I: Consider the following definition:A fruit is the product of a tree or other plant that contains seeds and can be eaten as food.A fruit is the reproductive body of a seed plant, generally edible.Create deductive arguments that demonstrate that a tomato is a fruit and a seedless orange is not a fruit.Part II: Consider the following facts:John does not like sliced tomatoes.John removes cherry tomatoes from any salad he eats.John dislikes both ketchup and tomato soup.Create an inductive argument regarding whether or not John will like marinara sauce.Part III:In addition to creating the arguments, in a paragraph, explain the differences between deductive and inductive arguments.